Down and Dirty Democrat Clinton vs. Up and Clean Democrat Obama: Hard Ball Time!

Posted on January 24, 2008. Filed under: Blogroll, Economics, Links, Politics, Rants, Raves, Video, War |

The Clinton campaign strategy is to attack their opponents with the truth or lies, whichever gets the job down.

The only way to successfully counter such tactics is attack them with your own offensive strategy and put them on defense.

The Clintons mention a campaign contributor of yours, you mention three of theirs and their Chinese Communists laundered money to boot.

Politics is hard ball.

Time for some baseball and some individual achievement

Al Capone – The Untouchables

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73EPp81C97M

Barry if you want to beat the Clintons you must do it The Chicago Way:

The Chicago Way

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7g0RLyxP13o

Barry better get some practice sessions with Hillary and Bill Clinton, the Republicans play to win!

HILLARY CLINTON EXPOSES BARACK OBAMA FOR LYING

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o9qawUfkHO4

[PRES] Clinton: Anti-Obama Radio Ad

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fjdh8zigMg8

Obama Smackdown Series: Bill Clinton attacks Obama

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUm7tkgFGYs

Obama: Hillary will say anything to get elected

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ya9U1xZ-HIQ

Hillary Clinton Will Do Anything To Win

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VnAJDyIYptM

Barry needs to increase the ridicule in his ads–Nurse Hillary changed nothing with Hillarycare–a total disaster and complete failure–an experience not worth repeating.

1993 Clinton health care plan

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1993_Clinton_health_care_plan

A real funny example of riducule from a friend of Hillary Clinton:

Rush Limbaugh’s Barack the Magic Negro

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xm6hlj-BV0s

Barack the Magic Negro

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvXz2xaLNMQ&feature=related

Barry needs to go back and review the works Saul Alinsky–the prince of darkness–especially Rule 5:

“Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins — or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer.”

Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals

RULE 1: “Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.” Power is derived from 2 main sources – money and people. “Have-Nots” must build power from flesh and blood. (These are two things of which there is a plentiful supply. Government and corporations always have a difficult time appealing to people, and usually do so almost exclusively with economic arguments.)

RULE 2: “Never go outside the expertise of your people.” It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone. (Organizations under attack wonder why radicals don’t address the “real” issues. This is why. They avoid things with which they have no knowledge.)

RULE 3: “Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy.” Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty. (This happens all the time. Watch how many organizations under attack are blind-sided by seemingly irrelevant arguments that they are then forced to address.)

RULE 4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.” If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules. (This is a serious rule. The besieged entity’s very credibility and reputation is at stake, because if activists catch it lying or not living up to its commitments, they can continue to chip away at the damage.)

RULE 5: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions. (Pretty crude, rude and mean, huh? They want to create anger and fear.)

RULE 6: “A good tactic is one your people enjoy.” They’ll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They’re doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones. (Radical activists, in this sense, are no different that any other human being. We all avoid “un-fun” activities, and but we revel at and enjoy the ones that work and bring results.)

RULE 7: “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.” Don’t become old news. (Even radical activists get bored. So to keep them excited and involved, organizers are constantly coming up with new tactics.)

RULE 8: “Keep the pressure on. Never let up.” Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new. (Attack, attack, attack from all sides, never giving the reeling organization a chance to rest, regroup, recover and re-strategize.)

RULE 9: “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.” Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist. (Perception is reality. Large organizations always prepare a worst-case scenario, something that may be furthest from the activists’ minds. The upshot is that the organization will expend enormous time and energy, creating in its own collective mind the direst of conclusions. The possibilities can easily poison the mind and result in demoralization.)

RULE 10: “If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.” Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog. (Unions used this tactic. Peaceful [albeit loud] demonstrations during the heyday of unions in the early to mid-20th Century incurred management’s wrath, often in the form of violence that eventually brought public sympathy to their side.)

RULE 11: “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.” Never let the enemy score points because you’re caught without a solution to the problem. (Old saw: If you’re not part of the solution, you’re part of the problem. Activist organizations have an agenda, and their strategy is to hold a place at the table, to be given a forum to wield their power. So, they have to have a compromise solution.)

RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)

http://www.geocities.com/WallStreet/8925/alinsky.htm

Saul Alinsky and the Lessons He Taught Bill and Hillary

“…Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon. It is almost impossible to counterattack ridicule. Also, it infuriates the opposition, who then react to your advantage. …”

http://www.americanpatrol.com/REFERENCE/Alinsky-SaulRef.html

Obama, Hillary and Alinsky’s Tactics

“…Now we have a real fight between two Alinsky-ites — Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton — each of whom has positioned himself/herself as a champion of the Have-Nots, a fighter for socialist remedies to every human problem. And the verbal stabs each is aiming at the other have become more of the focus of the contest than has any substantive issue. …”

http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/01/obama_hillary_and_alinskys_rul.html

Hillary, Soros, Alinsky, and Rush

“…If you want a complete rundown on how all of Hillary’s and Soros’ “non-profit groups” work together in her plan to take over America, get yourself a copy of the book by her mentor, Saul Alinsky, Rules for Radicals. In it, you’ll find the complete outline for throwing Judeo/Christian principles and honesty to the winds of revolutionary fervor. Hillary Clinton has been the perfectly patient disciple of Alinsky’s since she wrote her thesis about him her senior year at Wellesley in 1969. If her admiration of Alinsky had died with her thesis, no one would care. But it didn’t. He remained a close confidant until his death (The Shadow Party, p. 56) and his tactical fingerprints are all over her projection of the false “Centrist” image she is manipulating to garner political power. It’s all in the book. …”

http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/10/hillary_soros_alinsky_and_rush.html

Hillary’s Choice: Political Power and Alinsky

“…The point of contention between Clinton and Obama is a farcical version of the difference between Johnson and King. Clinton and Obama merely studied and dabbled in what Johnson and King and even Alinsky did — yet those studies and dabblings are what the electorate is invited to choose between. One writer commented to The Atlantic’s Andrew Sullivan, “The principal difference between Hillary and Obama is not race or gender at all, but Saul Alinsky.” Not exactly.

The real difference is that Hillary was earlier to discern that the power of elected officials is the key to radicals’ victory. By running for public office, Obama now implicitly agrees. Whether as street corner agitator, Senator or candidate, they both embody ideology as a substitute for life. …”

http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/01/hillarys_choice_political_powe.html

The Untouchables Trailer

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIF_WdPUBFo

Buck O’Neil – Take Me Out To The Ballgame

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yxf000X5G_8

Buck O’Neil

“…On December 7, 2006, Buck was posthumously honored with the Presidential Medal of Freedom^[6]; the award was given to his brother, Warren, on his behalf on December 15. He was chosen due to his “excellence and determination both on and off the baseball field,” according to the White House news release. He joins such sports notables as Jesse Owens, Muhammad Ali, Joe DiMaggio, and Jack Nicklaus in receiving the United States’ highest civilian honor. …”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buck_O’Neil

Sing a long:

Kellie Pickler – Take Me Out To The Ball Game

“Take me out to the ball game,
Take me out with the crowd.
Buy me some peanuts and Cracker Jack,
I don’t care if I never get back,
Let me root, root, root for the home team,
If they don’t win it’s a shame.
For it’s one, two, three strikes, you’re out,
At the old ball game.”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0r9hAfGSnU

Time for some warmth or hot air–Gore/Obama in 2008!

Sweet Home Gore-Obama

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T8eR48X_zXU&feature=related

Run Al Run!

…And the Democratic Presidential nominee is:

Obama, Hillary, or Gore?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ucKiVYsHp-I

Background Articles and Videos

Clinton gets proxy to play race card
BET founder now doing her bidding against Obama

“…While introducing Clinton at Columbia College on Sunday, Johnson said, “To me, as an African-American, I am frankly insulted the Obama campaign would imply that we are so stupid that we would think Hillary and Bill Clinton, who have been deeply and emotionally involved in black issues — when Barack Obama was doing something in the neighborhood; I won’t say what he was doing, but he stated in his book — when they [the Clintons] have been involved.”Johnson’s righteous indignation might not seem so outlandish if it were not for several ironies worth noting here: A glance at the first half of his convoluted remarks reveals that the most glaring contradiction relates to Johnson himself.Johnson made his fortune as the founder of BET, a cable television network that has long been criticized by many blacks for peddling the television equivalent of crack cocaine. As the owner of BET, Johnson led the way in promoting round-the-clock TV programs and videos that denigrate women and celebrate gangsterism and all manner of black pathology. …”

http://www.ajc.com/opinion/content/opinion/stories/2008/01/16/mccalled_0117.html

Dick Morris on Hillary Clinton and Obama – Part 1 of 2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y1tlNsUzhwo&feature=related

Dick Morris on Hillary Clinton and Obama – Part 2 of 2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ia080VfrkFU

Will They Play the Race Card?

“…I’m scared for Barack Obama, but not for the same reasons that many other black voters are. While the possibility of a crazed gunman coming after him does worry me, my real fear is grounded in something more probable — that Hillary Clinton, after her less-than-stellar showing in Iowa and her close call in New Hampshire, will now go straight for Obama‘s jugular. Race, whether used subtly or as a blunt weapon, will undoubtedly be a factor.

We saw inklings of it last February in South Carolina, a state rich with black voters that holds its primary this month. News reports disclosed that an influential state lawmaker and prominent megachurch minister who had endorsed Clinton also happened to have a political consulting contract with the campaign worth some $200,000. Two other black state senators who later endorsed Clinton have financial ties to the lawmaker on the Clinton payroll. While the Clinton campaign defended the deal as legitimate and said the state senator was a longtime supporter, it looked to many like a slicker, ostensibly more respectable version of the old political strategy of spreading “street money” to black preachers to either depress or get out the black vote. …”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/11/AR2008011103281.html

Dick Morris on H&C, 5/29/07, p1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TuVJPPW_7nc&feature=related

Dick Morris on H&C, 5/29/07, p2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IYBd_ptAVHI

Barack Obama on Iraq, Opposition from the Start

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EhpKmQCCwB8

Barack on This Week with George Stephanopoulos

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vGpjFh5Izkc

Heated Clinton-Obama clash marks S.C. debate

“The simmering hostility between Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama exploded in a series of extraordinary personal clashes in South Carolina Monday night.

The bitterness that characterized their fight in the Nevada caucuses last week spilled into the Palace Theatre here, with Clinton charging Obama with shifting answers to suit his political needs — and Obama questioning her commitment to workers, citing her service on the board of anti-union Wal-Mart.

“When I was working on the streets, [as a community organizer in Chicago] you were a corporate lawyer working on the board of Wal-Mart,” he said. …”

http://www.newsday.com/news/politics/ny-usdeba0122,0,4962307.story

Dick Morris “Just Knows” Clintons Behind Obama Smear

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KjEXigo_wFM

Dick Morris: Use of Obama’s Middle Name Is “Racist Garbage”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aa-fhfuB_vI

The Shadow Party: Part I

By David Horowitz and Richard Poe

“…The devolution of the Democrats from the Cold War party of Harry Truman and John F. Kennedy to the progressive party of Edward Kennedy and John F. Kerry has long been in progress, and is not quite complete. But the Democrats’ final transformation into a party of the left in the European mode may not be far off. Barely noticed by political observers, an activist juggernaut has seized control of the party’s national electoral apparatus, organized, financed and directed by the left. This party within the party has no official name, but some journalists and commentators have begun referring to it as the Shadow Party, a term that we will use as well. It denotes a network of non-profit groups presently raising hundreds of millions of dollars for deployment on the campaign battlefield. This money pays for advertising, get-out-the-vote-drives, opposition research, dirty tricks and virtually every aspect of a modern electoral campaign. But it does so through independent groups with no formal connection to the Democratic Party.

Follow the Money

The Shadow Party emerged from the dense thicket of campaign finance reforms engineered by Senators John McCain and Russ Feingold. Thanks to the soft-money ban enacted by the McCain-Feingold Act of March 27, 2002, the Democratic Party entered the current election cycle hard pressed to raise enough money legally to undertake a winning campaign. This created an imperative that found its inevitable loophole (as critics of McCain-Feingold always warned it would). Consequently, the driving force in the political war against George Bush is now a group of billionaires and millionaires operating through the veiled structures of the Shadow Party. …”

….

“…By early 2004, the Shadow Party’s infrastructure had assumed a coherent shape, under Soros’ guidance. At its heart lay seven ostensibly “independent” non-profit groups which constitute the network’s administrative core. Let us call them the Seven Sisters. In chronological order, based upon their launch dates, they are:

1. MoveOn.org Launched September 22, 1998

2. Center for American Progress (CAP) Launched July 7, 2003

3. America Votes Launched July 15, 2003

4. America Coming Together (ACT) Launched July 17, 2003

5. The Media Fund Launched November 5, 2003

6. Joint Victory Campaign 2004 Launched November 5, 2003

7. The Thunder Road Group LLC Launched early 2004 …”

http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID={1C995DDB-9F7D-4EB7-83A2-5304F950EB41}

http://www.frontpagemag.com/

The Return of Hillarycare?

by Michael D. Tanner

“…Perhaps it has been so long that Americans have forgotten exactly what Hillarycare was. If so, it’s worth reminding them. Under the Clinton plan, the government would have taken control of nearly one-seventh of the U.S. economy. It would have established the world’s largest government program — dwarfing even Social Security — created a huge new bureaucracy and required massive tax increases.

Government knows best?

The entire idea behind the Clinton health care plan was that government knew best — better than businesses, better than doctors, and better than patients.The Clinton plan would have required every business in America to provide health care coverage to its employees, regardless of cost. The mandate would have devastated small businesses and cost thousands of jobs.

Clinton’s plan would also have forced Americans to give up their current health insurance, even if they were happy with it, in return for a government-designed standard benefit package that could be far more expensive. …”

http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=6789

Hillary Clinton’s First Health Care Non-Reform

“Accommodating the insurance behemoths, and effectively offering them massive public subsidies–using the considerable power of government to force everyone to become paying customers of the private insurers–is not the kind of leadership on health care we need.”

http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/09/hillary-clintons-first-health-care-non-reform/

Hillary Clinton’s Opposing Statements on Iraq War

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MyC7loMop58

Flip Flop of Democrats on Iraq War

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_CepS8u9wQ

Saul Alinsky

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saul_Alinsky

The Democratic Promise: Saul Alinsky

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExnWQZDhHNw

Obama on the Attack

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xD_R6T2Yug0

Mitt Romney ATTACKS Hillary Clinton During Debate 1/24/08

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=weHZkdTOwtQ

Hillary Clinton’s Wellesley Thesis

http://gopublius.com/hillary-clintons-wellesley-thesis/

LOL

Hillary vs Obama

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YqOHquOkpaU&feature=related

Hott 4 Hill feat. Taryn Southern

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Sudw4ghVe8

I Got a Crush…On Obama” By Obama Girl

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wKsoXHYICqU

Red State Update: Jackie ’08 Hsu Scandal

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0_bmWQhYcQU

Hillary wants to SPEND more of YOUR $…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXWJh5u_EjI

Democrat or Republican???

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFVDmaU8RTo

Make a Comment

34 Responses to “Down and Dirty Democrat Clinton vs. Up and Clean Democrat Obama: Hard Ball Time!”

RSS Feed for Pronk Palisades Comments RSS Feed

[…] Top 5 News & results on never back down Down and Dirty Democrat Clinton vs. Up and Clean Democrat Obama …: I don?t care if I never get… Double Feature Saturday: Never Back Down and Chocolate Trailers: The first one is Never Back Down, […]

never back down | Hot Trends Right Now
January 24, 2008

Hi,

Today I have visited your blog and found some quality information. I think you have maintained a great blog. That’s why we would like to exchange links with your blog.

My blog is : http://www.mesoattorney.us

Please send me your link info.

Waiting for your reply.

With Best Regards,
Daniel

Daniel
January 24, 2008