Right Of Barrack Obama–ROBO Voters for John McCain

Posted on May 13, 2008. Filed under: Blogroll, Climate, Economics, Immigration, Links, Politics, Rants, Raves, Resources, Taxes, Technology, Video, War |

The conventional wisdom in American politics is for the candidates to run towards their political base in the primaries and in the general election run toward the center.

John McCain, aka the “maverick”, instead ran towards the center and left in the primaries and away from his conservative Republican base on the right.

He will get the Republican nomination for President largely due to the split of conservative voters among several candidates.

Many movement conservatives simply do not consider Senator McCain to be a conversative any longer.

As a result they have closed their wallets to both Senator McCain and the Republican Party.

Conservatives might even stay home in November, unless Senator McCain picks as his running mate an acceptable conservative, such as former Governor Mitt Romney.

Fortunately for Senator McCain, the Democrats will nominate Senator Obama as their Presidential candidate, a far left candidate that in the general election will be lucky if he gets 40% of the vote.

The general election could be a repeat of 1972, 1980 or 1984 with a landslide victory for the Republican candidate, John McCain.


The American electorate like their Presidents to be in the center, either center right or center left, and not on the edges, either far left or far right.

Both Senators Clinton and Obama are clearly left of center with Barack Obama considered to be the most liberal Senator by far.

Senator Obama actually thinks that more taxes, more government spending, and more regulations are a change for the better.

Actually they are more of the same plans, policies and programs that both Democrats and Liberal Republicans have been peddling for nearly eighty years.

Some people never learn from their mistakes.

It is certainly not the audacity of hope.

It is really the arrogance of the ignorant.

Senator Obama will get 90% of the black, university faculties, and main-stream media votes, these voters invariably vote Democratic, no matter who the Democratic Party has on the ticket.

Once Senator’s Obama’s political positions become known in the general election, both independent voters and former Reagan Democrats will vote for Senator McCain. These voters are clearly to the Right Of Barack Obama–the ROBO voters.

Senator Obama has the advantage in Money or campaign contributions. Money buys a lot of media that can be decisive in a close election.

Unless Senator McCain starts to quickly build bridges to the conservative movement base, many conservatives and libertarians, including me, will stay home and let the independent and Reagan Democratic ROBO voters decide the election. 

May be  Senator McCain can win with just the independent and Reagan Democrats ROBO voters.

I seriously doubt it and I think Senator McCain knows it as well.

The Republican Party could have had a landslide victory in 2008 had it nominated a principled conservative, instead of a “maverick”.

The United States of America might be in for a repeat of the Carter administration, the worse Presidency in at least seventy years.

The election results will depend upon the conversative movement base, the independents and Reagan Democrats–the ROBO voters!


Background Articles and Videos


There’s No Doubt: Liberal Media Trying to Protect Obama


Obama: Most Liberal Senator In 2007

“…In their yearlong race for the Democratic presidential nomination, Obama and Clinton have had strikingly similar voting records. Of the 267 measures on which both senators cast votes in 2007, the two differed on only 10. “The policy differences between Clinton and Obama are so slight they are almost nonexistent to the average voter,” said Richard Lau, a Rutgers University political scientist.

How They Scored

But differences define campaigns. The yeas and nays matter. And in a Senate in which party-line votes are the rule, the rare exceptions help to show how two senators who seemed like ideological twins in 2007 were not actually identical. Obama and Clinton were more like fraternal policy twins, NJ‘s vote ratings show. …”


NARAL Pro-Choice America PAC Endorses Sen. Barack Obama


NARAL Pro-Choice America PAC endorses Sen. Barack Obama for President!

Sen. Obama is fully pro-choice. In his own words:

“A woman’s ability to decide how many children to have and when, without interference from the government, is one of the most fundamental rights we possess.  It is not just an issue of choice, but equality and opportunity for all women.

“I have consistently advocated for reproductive choice and will make preserving women’s rights under Roe v. Wade a priority as President.  I oppose any constitutional amendment to overturn the Supreme Court’s ruling in this case.

“I believe we must work together to reduce the number of unintended pregnancies.  I support legislation to expand access to contraception, health information, and preventative services to help reduce unintended pregnancies.  That is why I co-sponsored the Prevention First Act of 2007, which will increase funding for family planning and comprehensive sex education that teaches both abstinence and safe sex methods.  It will also end insurance discrimination against contraception, improve awareness about emergency contraception, and provide compassionate assistance to rape victims.


Alan Keyes on Obama’s support for infanticide


Obama More Pro-Choice Than NARAL

“Sen. Barack Obama (D.-Ill.) portrays himself as a thoughtful Democrat who carefully considers both sides of controversial issues, but his radical stance on abortion puts him further left on that issue than even NARAL Pro-Choice America.

In 2002, as an Illinois legislator, Obama voted against the Induced Infant Liability Act, which would have protected babies that survived late-term abortions. That same year a similar federal law, the Born Alive Infant Protection Act, was signed by President Bush. Only 15 members of the U.S. House opposed it, and it passed the Senate unanimously on a voice vote.

Both the Illinois and the federal bill sought equal treatment for babies who survived premature inducement for the purpose of abortion and wanted babies who were born prematurely and given live-saving medical attention. …”


Barack Obama’s Snake Oil
By Joan Swirsky

“…According to a sacred United States Code (Title 36, Chapter 10, Sec. 171): During rendition of the national anthem when the flag is displayed, all present except those in uniform are expected to stand at attention facing the flag with the right hand over the heart.

But asked about a famous photograph that showed him refusing to place his hand over his heart when our National Anthem was played, Obama offered no explanation. That non-explanation may play well in his elitist circles, but it would play like a stink bomb at Ground Zero in New York City, at the bombed-out Pentagon, in the fields of Shanksville, PA, and in the heartland of America – in fact, in all the places that “bitter” people “cling to God and guns” and other things that Obama clearly holds in contempt.

In spite of overwhelming evidence about the truly dreadful choices that Democrats offer our country next November – Hillary the pathological liar and Barack the Manchurian Candidate incarnate – Obama has smitten a hungry and thirsty electorate for the “hope” and “change” he promises.

To the prospect of his presidency, every sane American should say God forbid!”


Newt on Carter and Obama


O’Reilly on ABC Debate, Exposes Obama and Far-Left Cowards


Michelle Malkin on Michelle Obama’s lack of pride


His Bitter Half
Michelle Obama, Queen of the Grievance-Mongers.By Michelle Malkin“…Barack Obama, the missus explains, is Everyman who has ever been put down by The Man. And “understand this” (a condescending verbal tic shared by both Obamas): Mrs. Obama is here to make sure you feel their pain. Which is really your pain. Because the hardships of a privileged Ivy League couple are “exactly” the same as the travails of miners or service workers or small-business owners: “So the bar has been shifting and moving in this race,” she grumbles, “but the irony is, the sad irony is, that’s exactly what is happening to most Americans in this country.”Don’t tell Michelle about the Great Depression or the Carter Malaise. “Folks are struggling like never before,” she seethes.Well, yes, gas prices are up. Some food prices are rising. And borrowers who bought more housing than they could afford are underwater. But “struggling like never before”? Didn’t they teach her about Hoovervilles and stagflation?…”


Obama’s hidden agenda: “Global Poverty Act” NWO


Obama & Ayers | Ayers-Terroristic & World Communism Agenda?


Socialist-Marxist-Communist, Say Hello to Michelle Obama


Response to Obama, 4: What’s wrong with Obama’s Leftist View


Response to Obama, 5: Tax Rates and Job Creation


Response to Obama, 6: The Difficulty of Change


Rev Wright Gives Obama A Weekend From Hell Says Matthews


Barack Obama Repudiates Rev. Jeremiah Wright


Obama mentor: ‘Smash on, victory-eating Red Army’
Poetry also lambastes ‘Sweet Jesus,’ mocks ‘Onward Christian Soldiers’

“… The man who heavily influenced U.S. Sen. Barack Obama during his growing years wrote poetry praising the aggression of communism, criticizing “Sweet Jesus” and mocking the traditional hymn “Onward Christian Soldiers,” according to an advocate for media accuracy.

WND reported earlier when Cliff Kincaid wrote at Accuracy in Media about the link between Frank Marshall Davis, a member of the old Moscow-controlled Communist Party USA, and Obama, who cited a mysterious “Frank” in his book.

Now Kincaid has uncovered poetry written by Davis that hails the Soviet Union’s Red Army, with a call to “Smash on, victory-eating Red Army,” and a wide range of attacks on or mockery of Christianity.

“One Davis poem, ‘Christ is a Dixie Ni—er,’ dismisses Christ as ‘another New White Hope’ and declares: ‘Remember this, you wise guys Your tales about Jesus of Nazareth are no-go with Me I’ve got a dozen Christs in Dixie all bloody and black…,” Kincaid said. …”


Is Barack Obama A Marxist Mole?

“…In his books, Obama admits attending “socialist conferences” and coming into contact with Marxist literature. But he ridicules the charge of being a “hard-core academic Marxist,” which was made by his colorful and outspoken 2004 U.S. Senate opponent, Republican Alan Keyes.

However, through Frank Marshall Davis, Obama had an admitted relationship with someone who was publicly identified as a member of the Communist Party USA (CPUSA). The record shows that Obama was in Hawaii from 1971-1979, where, at some point in time, he developed a close relationship, almost like a son, with Davis, listening to his “poetry” and getting advice on his career path. But Obama, in his book, Dreams From My Father, refers to him repeatedly as just “Frank.”

The reason is apparent: Davis was a known communist who belonged to a party subservient to the Soviet Union. In fact, the 1951 report of the Commission on Subversive Activities to the Legislature of the Territory of Hawaii identified him as a CPUSA member. What’s more, anti-communist congressional committees, including the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC), accused Davis of involvement in several communist-front organizations. …” 


Frank Marshall Davis

Frank Marshall Davis (December 31, 1905, Arkansas City, Kansas; July 26, 1987, Honolulu, Hawaii) was an African-American journalist, poet and political and labor movement activist. He was investigated for his links with the Communist party in the United States.[1] 

“…Links between Davis and Barack Obama

In his autobiographical Dreams from My Father, US senator and Democratic party presidential candidate Barack Obama writes of “Frank”, a friend of his grandfather’s. “Frank” has been identified as probably being Davis.[17] Trevor Loudon, of New Zealand first posted evidence that “Frank” was Frank Marshall Davis in March of 2007. Frank told Obama that both grew up only 50 miles apart, near Wichita, although they didn’t know each other then, and told him about the days of Jim Crow in Kansas. Frank told Obama that college was about “leaving your race at the door, leaving your people behind” and being trained, not educated. As Obama remembered, “It made me smile, thinking back on Frank and his old Black Power, dashiki self. In some ways he was as incurable as my mother, as certain in his faith, living in the same sixties time warp that Hawaii had created.”[18] This “Frank” was Davis…”


Frank Marshall Davis: Black Labor Activist and Outsider Journalist:

Social Movements in Hawai`i 

by: Kathryn Waddell Takara, Ph.D.

“…Frank Marshall Davis (1905-1987), was a journalist, labor activist, poet, ex-patriate, and resident of Hawaii for almost forty years.  As an outsider looking in, he functioned as a significant voice in documenting the progress of the social movement in Hawaii from a plantation to a tourist based economy.[1]  In his weekly column,  “Frankly Speaking,” in the union newspaper The Honolulu Record, he acted as a commentator on the impact of the union movement on the plantation economy in the post war Honolulu scene.  As a major national journalist and former editor of the Associated Negro Press, Davis was able to analyze the changing configurations of ethnic groups, class structures and strategies of control.  His keen observation of the imperialist forces and his subsequent fall in status due to his outspoken editorials seem a paradox in a “so-called” paradise.  His was a voice that inspired and threatened.  His uniqueness as a black journalist and his middle class status showed that Hawaii was indeed one of the few places in the 1940s and 50s where blacks held roles other than agricultural or service workers in a multi-ethnic setting.[2]   …”


A Living Lie
Obama’s controversial statements in San Francisco are perfectly in line with his Senate record.

By Thomas Sowell

“…Like so much that Obama has said and done over the years, this is standard stuff on the far Left, where guns and religion are regarded as signs of psychological dysfunction — and where opinions different from those of the Left are ascribed to emotions (“bitter” in this case), rather than to arguments that need to be answered.

Like so many others on the Left, Obama rejects “stereotypes” when they are stereotypes he doesn’t like but blithely throws around his own stereotypes about “a typical white person” or “bitter” gun-toting, religious, and racist working-class people.

In politics, the clearer a statement is, the more certain it is to be followed by a “clarification,” when people react adversely to what was plainly said. …”

“…Obama is also part of a long tradition on the Left of being for the working class in the abstract, or as people potentially useful for the purposes of the Left, but having disdain or contempt for them as human beings.

Karl Marx said, “The working class is revolutionary or it is nothing.” In other words, they mattered only in so far as they were willing to carry out the Marxist agenda. …”


Barack Obama’s Bitter Liberalism
By George Will

“…The iconic public intellectual of liberal condescension was Columbia University historian Richard Hofstadter, who died in 1970 but whose spirit still permeated that school when Obama matriculated there in 1981. Hofstadter pioneered the rhetorical tactic that Obama has revived with his diagnosis of working-class Democrats as victims — the indispensable category in liberal theory. The tactic is to dismiss rather than refute those with whom you disagree.

Obama’s dismissal is: Americans, especially working-class conservatives, are unable, because of their false consciousness, to deconstruct their social context and embrace the liberal program. Today that program is to elect Obama, thereby making his wife at long last proud of America.

Hofstadter dismissed conservatives as victims of character flaws and psychological disorders — a “paranoid style” of politics rooted in “status anxiety,” etc. Conservatism rose on a tide of votes cast by people irritated by the liberalism of condescension.

Obama voiced such liberalism with his “bitterness” remarks to an audience of affluent San Franciscans. Perfect. …”


Thomas: Time to leave socialist Obama at the altar

“…One reason this socialistic mind-set resonates favorably with many is because the shift in the past half-century from promoting hard work, self- sufficiency, marriage, personal responsibility and accountability and living within one’s means, to a mentality that I am entitled to the fruits of other people’s labor.

Another reason the Obama (and Clinton) class envy works is that too many people are economic illiterates. They can’t tell the difference between compound interest and a compound fracture. …” 



Oprah is smarter than Barack Obama…


Democrat or Republican???



Related Post of Pronk Palisades

Clinton & Obama: First They Lie To You and Then They Steal Your Property!

Barack Obama: A Watermellon Man–Green on The Outside–Red on The Inside

Fathers, Mothers and Babies for Senator John McCain!

Barack Obama Throws His White Grandma Under The Bus–Backs Up and Does It Again–Amazing!

Barack Obama–Damaged Goods–Birds of A Feather Flock Together

Barack Obama Cult?

Barack Obama–A Reader Not A Leader!

Hillary Clinton: It is My Party And I Will Cry If I Want To and I Fall To Pieces–Woman Weeper!

John McCain and Hillary Clinton Anger Management Issues

Conservatives Are Waiting for A John McCain Moment On YouTube–The Eyes of Texas!

Bill Clinton Elected To Tell Hillary Rodham–It is Over!

Hillary Clinton–Requiem for A Goldwater Girl

John McCain’s Position on Illegal Immigration and Criminal Alien Removal?

The Cost of Comprehensive Immigration Reform–McCain and Obama Are Hopeless–It is the Economy Stupid!

John McCain–A Candidate too Far Left

Conservative Turnout Will Determine the Outcome of The Presidential 2008 Race Between McCain vs. Obama

Turnout of Voters Key to Victory in Presidential Election 2008

Alan Keyes on Immigration

Clinton Obama Fusion Ticket–Who is On Top?

The Kennedy Clinton Democratic Party Civil War Over Obama–Happy Days Are Here Again!

Voters Beware: The Radical Rules of Saul Alinsky and Leftist Democrats

Yes We Can–Throw You Under The Bus–Presidential Campaign 2008 Mantra

Down and Dirty Democrat Clinton vs. Up and Clean Democrat Obama: Hard Ball Time!




Make a Comment

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

17 Responses to “Right Of Barrack Obama–ROBO Voters for John McCain”

RSS Feed for Pronk Palisades Comments RSS Feed

Seeing that one may have no room to actually get to the left of Mr. Obama, I guess I’m a ROBO.

Then there’s this: True revolutionaries do not flaunt their radicalism, they cut their hair, put on suits [no flag pins] and infiltrate the system from within. – Saul Alinsky.

Yup, I’m a ROBO!

[…] Right Of Barrack Obama–ROBO Voters for John McCain […]

[…] Right Of Barrack Obama–ROBO Voters for John McCain […]

[…] Right Of Barrack Obama–ROBO Voters for John McCain […]

[…] Right Of Barrack Obama–ROBO Voters for John McCain […]

[…] Right Of Barrack Obama–ROBO Voters for John McCain […]

[…] Right Of Barrack Obama–ROBO Voters for John McCain […]

[…] Right Of Barrack Obama–ROBO Voters for John McCain […]

[…] Right Of Barrack Obama–ROBO Voters for John McCain […]

[…] Right Of Barrack Obama–ROBO Voters for John McCain […]

[…] Right Of Barrack Obama–ROBO Voters for John McCain […]

[…] Right Of Barrack Obama–ROBO Voters for John McCain […]

Where's The Comment Form?

Liked it here?
Why not try sites on the blogroll...

%d bloggers like this: