Obama’s Racist Department of Justice–Videos
Former DOJ Attorney Makes Explosive Accusations
“Security” patrols stationed at polling places in Philly
Obama ENDORSES Black Panthers intimidate voters in Pennsylvania
Eric Holder Drops Charges on Black Panthers for Voter Intimidation – Bill O’Reilly Reports
Look at the first video below at about the thiry second point– the man holding the sign of Obama 2008 just so happens to be the same man in the next video that was holding the night stick or club at the voter polling place that Attorney General Holder elected not to prosecute, King Samir Shabazz and Jerry Jackson for voter intimidation.
Economic Justice, Income Redistribution, Reparations!
“Security” patrols stationed at polling places in Philly
Obama Team Dismisses Black Panther Voter Intimidation Suit
Hannity And Malkin Play The Race Card Against DOJ
Eric Holder Drops Charges on Black Panthers for Voter Intimidation – Bill O’Reilly Reports
The United States Department of Justice refuses to go after Obama supporters–The New Black Panther Party!
Barack Obama and The New Black Panther Party
New Black Panthers
Background Articles and Videos
The New Black Panther Party PT.1
The New Black Panther Party PT.2
The New Black Panther Party PT.3
The New Black Panther Party PT.4
The New Black Panther Party PT.5
Former DOJ Attorney Makes Explosive Accusations
“…In May, Adams resigned from the DOJ and since has gone public with the story of the “hows and whys” the Black Panther case was dropped. It shows a DOJ making decisions based on race and a top-level official not being truthful during testimony before Congress.
Based on my firsthand experiences, I believe the dismissal of the Black Panther case was motivated by a lawless hostility toward equal enforcement of the law. Others still within the department share my assessment. The department abetted wrongdoers and abandoned law-abiding citizens victimized by the New Black Panthers. The dismissal raises serious questions about the department’s enforcement neutrality in upcoming midterm elections and the subsequent 2012 presidential election,
The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights has opened an investigation into the dismissal and the DOJ’s skewed enforcement priorities. Attorneys who brought the case are under subpoena to testify, but the department ordered us to ignore the subpoena, lawlessly placing us in an unacceptable legal limbo.
Adams says that this is the most open an shut case of voter intimidation that he had seen during his years of service at the DOJ Voting Rights Division. They had sworn testimony that the members of the Black Panther party blocked white voters from entering the polling place. But that wasn’t the testimony the DOJ gave before Congress:
The assistant attorney general for civil rights, Tom Perez, has testified repeatedly that the “facts and law” did not support this case. That claim is false. If the actions in Philadelphia do not constitute voter intimidation, it is hard to imagine what would, short of an actual outbreak of violence at the polls….
Most corrupt of all, the lawyers who ordered the dismissal – Loretta King, the Obama-appointed acting head of the Civil Rights Division, and Steve Rosenbaum – did not even read the internal Justice Department memorandums supporting the case and investigation. Just as Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. admitted that he did not read the Arizona immigration law before he condemned it, Mr. Rosenbaum admitted that he had not bothered to read the most important department documents detailing the investigative facts and applicable law in the New Black Panther case…”
Ex-Official Accuses Justice Department of Racial Bias in Black Panther Case
“…In emotional and personal testimony, an ex-Justice official who quit over the handling of a voter intimidation case against the New Black Panther Party accused his former employer of instructing attorneys in the civil rights division to ignore cases that involve black defendants and white victims.
J. Christian Adams, testifying Tuesday before the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, said that “over and over and over again,” the department showed “hostility” toward those cases. He described the Black Panther case as one example of that — he defended the legitimacy of the suit and said his “blood boiled” when he heard a Justice official claim the case wasn’t solid.
“It is false,” Adams said of the claim.
“We abetted wrongdoing and abandoned law-abiding citizens,” he later testified.
The department abandoned the New Black Panther case last year. It stemmed from an incident on Election Day in 2008 in Philadelphia, where members of the party were videotaped in front of a polling place, dressed in military-style uniforms and allegedly hurling racial slurs while one brandished a night stick. …”
Leave a comment