Bailout Bill vs. Rescue Economy American People (REAP) Law

Posted on October 1, 2008. Filed under: Blogroll, Economics, Investments, Life, Links, Politics, Raves, Regulations, Resources, Taxes, Video | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , |

Charlie Rose – Al Hunt & Floyd Norris

Bush Implores Congress to Act to Rescue Markets


Financial meltdown timeline


“Remember this: Whoever sows sparingly will also reap sparingly, and whoever sows generously will also reap generously.”

~ 2 Corinthians 9:6

Forget about Treasury Secretary Paulson’s bailout bill that Congress voted down on Monday.
The Treasury does not need to purchase from financial institutions assets whose current value is temporarily depressed due to the decline in real estate prices. There are alternative courses of action to get liquidity or capital to financial institutions whose capital structure is impaired. Either loan money or invest funds in the financial institutions for up to five years. Let the financial institutions keep and sell the assets themselves when real estate prices recover. Then have the financial institutions repay the loan or buy back the preferred stock. There is no need for the Federal Government to purchase these assets. I know it, the American people know, and so does the Treasury Secretary and the President.

What will the American people support to rescue the economy?

1. Increase the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) from $100,000 to $250,000.

2. Increase the Securities Investor Protection Corporation insured ceiling from $500,000 to $1,000,000 per customer and increase the maximum of $100,000 for cash claims to $250,000.

3. Decrease the capital gains tax from 15% to 0%.

4. Repeal the mark to market accounting rules.

5. Allow financial institutions facing severe liquidity problems to borrow funds from the Federal Reserve for up to five years at an interest rate equal to prime plus three percent to encourage early repayment of the loan.

The greed, arrogance and stupidity (GAS) of the American elites in Washington and Wall Street needs to stop.

The American people no longer trust the American elites of both political parties and have lost confidence in their ability to either tell the truth or understand what urgently needs to be done.


Background Articles and Videos 

FDIC Insurance Explained

FDIC Insurance Fund Under Strain






Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) is a United States government corporation created by the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933. It provides deposit insurance which guarantees the safety of checking and savings deposits in member banks, currently up to $100,000 per depositor per bank. The vast number of bank failures in the Great Depression spurred the United States Congress to create an institution to guarantee deposits held by commercial banks, inspired by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and its Depositors Insurance Fund (DIF).

The FDIC insures accounts at different banks separately. For example, a person with accounts at two separate banks (not merely branches of the same bank) can keep $100,000 in each account and be insured for the total of $200,000. Also, accounts in different ownerships (such as beneficial ownership, trusts, and joint accounts) are considered separately for the $100,000 insurance limit. The Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2005 raised the amount of insurance for an Individual Retirement Account to $250,000. …”

“…Insurance requirements

To receive this benefit, member banks must follow certain liquidity and reserve requirements. Banks are classified in five groups according to their risk-based capital ratio:

  • Well capitalized: 10% or higher
  • Adequately capitalized: 8% or higher
  • Undercapitalized: less than 8%
  • Significantly undercapitalized: less than 6%
  • Critically undercapitalized: less than 2%

When a bank becomes undercapitalized the FDIC issues a warning to the bank. When the number drops below 6% the FDIC can change management and force the bank to take other corrective action. When the bank becomes critically undercapitalized the FDIC declares the bank insolvent and can take over management of the bank. …” 


Securities Investor Protection Corporation

“The Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC) is a federally mandated non-profit corporation in the United States that protects securities investors from harm if a broker/dealer defaults. Investors are not insured for any potential loss while invested in the market.

SIPC was created by the 1970 Securities Investor Protection Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78aaa et seq, but it is not a government agency; rather, it is a membership corporation funded by its members.

SIPC serves two primary roles in the event that a broker-dealer fails. First, SIPC acts to organize the distribution of customer cash and securities to investors. Second, to the extent a customer’s cash and/or securities are unavailable, SIPC provides insurance coverage up to $500,000 of the customer’s net equity balance including up to $100,000 in cash. …”


Clark SIPC Explained

Securities Investor Protection Corporation


Capital gains tax

“…A capital gains tax (abbreviated: CGT) is a tax charged on capital gains, the profit realized on the sale of a non-inventory asset that was purchased at a lower price. The most common capital gains are realized from the sale of stocks, bonds, precious metals and property. Not all countries implement a capital gains tax and most have different rates of taxation for individuals and corporations.

For equities, an example of a popular and liquid asset, each national or state legislation, have a large array of fiscal obligations that must be respected regarding capital gains. Taxes are charged by the state over the transactions, dividends and capital gains on the stock market. However, these fiscal obligations may vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction because, among other reasons, it could be assumed that taxation is already incorporated into the stock price through the different taxes companies pay to the state, or that tax free stock market operations are useful to boost economic growth.


Capital gains tax in the United States

“In the United States, individuals and corporations pay income tax on the net total of all their capital gains just as they do on other sorts of income. Capital gains are generally taxed at a preferential rate in comparison to ordinary income. This is intended to provide incentives for investors to make capital investments and to fund entrepreneurial activity. The amount an investor is taxed depends on both his or her tax bracket, and the amount of time the investment was held before being sold. Short-term capital gains are taxed at the investor’s ordinary income tax rate, and are defined as investments held for a year or less before being sold. Long-term capital gains, which apply to assets held for more than one year, are taxed at a lower rate than short-term gains. In 2003, this rate was reduced to 15%, and to 5% for individuals in the lowest two income tax brackets. These reduced tax rates were passed with a sunset provision and are effective through 2011; if they are not extended before that time, they will expire and revert to the rates in effect before 2003, which were generally 20%.

The reduced 15% tax rate on eligible dividends and capital gains, previously scheduled to expire in 2008, was extended through 2010 as a result of the Tax Reconciliation Act signed into law by President George W. Bush on May 17, 2006. As a result:

  • In 2008, 2009, and 2010, the tax rate on eligible dividends and long term capital gains is 0% for those in the 10% and 15% income tax brackets.
  • After 2010, dividends will be taxed at the taxpayer’s ordinary income tax rate, regardless of his or her tax bracket.
  • After 2010, the long-term capital gains tax rate will be 20% (10% for taxpayers in the 15% tax bracket).
  • After 2010, the qualified five-year 18% capital gains rate (8% for taxpayers in the 15% tax bracket) will be reinstated.

Technically, a “cost basis” is used, rather than the simple purchase price, to determine the taxable amount of the gain. The cost basis is the original purchase price, adjusted for various things including additional improvements or investments, taxes paid on dividends, certain fees, and depreciation.

The United States is unlike other countries in that its citizens are subject to U.S. tax on their worldwide income no matter where in the world they reside. U.S. citizens therefore find it difficult to take advantage of personal tax havens. Although there are some offshore bank accounts that advertise as tax havens, U.S. law requires reporting of income from those accounts and failure to do so constitutes tax evasion. …”


Capital Gains Tax


Mark to Market

“In accounting and finance, mark to market is the act of assigning a value to a position held in a financial instrument based on the current market price for the instrument or similar instruments. For example, the final value of a futures contract that expires in 9 months will not be known until it expires. If it is marked to market, for accounting purposes it is assigned the value that it would fetch in the open market currently. …”

Simple example

Example: If an investor owns 100 shares of a stock purchased for $40 per share, and that stock now trades at $60, the “mark-to-market” value of the shares is equal to (100 shares × $60), or $6,000, whereas the book value might (depending on the accounting principles used) only equal $4,000.

Similarly, if the stock falls to $30, the mark-to-market value is $3,000 and the investor has lost $1,000 of the original investment. If the stock was purchased on margin, this might trigger a margin call and the investor would have to come up with an amount sufficient to meet the margin requirements for his account.”

“…Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008

Section 132 of the proposed Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, titled “Authority to Suspend Mark-to-Market Accounting” restates the Securities and Exchange Commission’s authority to suspend the application of FAS 157 if the SEC determines that it is in the public interest and protects investors.

Section 133 of the proposed Act, titled “Study on Mark-to-Market Accounting,” requires the SEC, in consultation with the Federal Reserve Board and the Department of the Treasury, to conduct a study on mark-to-market accounting standards as provided in FAS 157, including its effects on balance sheets, impact on the quality of financial information, and other matters, and to report to Congress within 90 days on its findings.[4] …”


SEC gives banks more leeway on mark-to-market

“U.S. securities regulators on Tuesday gave the financial industry a reprieve from marking hard-to-value assets down to fire sale prices, throwing a lifeline to an industry beset by strained credit markets and the latest round of bank failures.

The U.S. stock market added to gains on the news, in hopes that regulators’ new interpretation of fair value, or mark-to-market, accounting rules, will slow or reverse the heavy flow of mortgage-related losses on banks’ balance sheets.

In the new guidance, first reported by Reuters, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission reminded financial services firms that they don’t need to use fire sale prices when evaluating their hard to price assets.

“This is a significant first step and adds stability, confidence, and liquidity within the capital markets,” said Steve Bartlett, president and chief executive of The Financial Services Roundtable. “By clarifying how to treat assets in an uncertain market, the SEC is continuing to provide transparency to investors and helping institutions to provide credit in periods of market stress.” …”


Special Report Mark To Market


Subprime Crisis: The Role of Off Balance Sheet Entities


Subprime: The Role of Off Balance Sheet Entitities Part 2


Subprime: Is Mark to Market Accounting Marking Things Worse


Newt Gingrich Bailout Proposal – Part 1


Newt Gingrich Bailout Proposal – Part 2


Heritage’s JD Foster Explains the Credit Crisis

Three Things to Know About Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac

1) Federal action is needed to restore confidence.
2) The companies are creations of big-government policies.
3) Breaking up the companies is long-term fix.


Wall Streets Day of Reckoning: Turmoil in the Global Market


Wall Street’s Day of Reckoning: The Fannie & Freddie Bailout


Richard Herring on What’s Next for Investment Banks


Franklin Allen on Lessons from the Subprime Crisis



Subprime crisis explanation by The Long Johns


Related Posts On Pronk Palisades

The Sovereign Wealth Fund Threat: Are Chinese Communists Behind Rush In Passing Bailout Bill?

The American People Want A Full Meal Buffett Deal–Not A Bailout!

Stop The Bailout: The American Elites’ Bum Rush of The American People–No Sale!

Obama Bombs Bailout Meeting–Whitehouse Still Standing–McCain Saved By House Republicans

Obama–ACORN–CRA–Congress–Democratic Party–Fannie Mae–Freddie Mac–Bailout–Socialism– Just Say No!

ACORN–Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now–Obama’s Red Shirts

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( 7 so far )

Stop The Bailout: The American Elites’ Bum Rush of The American People–No Sale!

Posted on September 25, 2008. Filed under: Blogroll, Economics, Investments, Life, Links, People, Politics, Rants, Raves, Regulations, Resources, Taxes, Video, War | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |

“…deficits don’t matter…”

~Vice-President Dick Cheney


President Reagan – Government is the problem


President Bush Addresses Nation on Economic Crisis


Michael Bloomberg – Origins of the Economic Crisis


Milton Friedman: The Purpose of the Federal Reserve


Milton Friedman – Greed


Milton Friedman – Regulation – The Government Industrial Complex



The rush by the American elites of both political parties in the Federal Government and Congress to have the American people or taxpayers bailout financial institutions to avoid a financial crisis and in turn an economic recession should be stopped.

The case for the bailout simply has not been made.

Full, complete and fair disclosure of all the risks and rewards of the bailout needs to clearly stated  and analyzed.

Alternatives need to be explored and discussed in depth. This includes both alternative courses of action and alternative scenarios.  One course of action based on one scenario recommended by the Treasury Secretary is not only unacceptable, but dangerous.

Remember it is was government internvention in the mortage market requiring lenders to make loans to people that would normally never qualify that is the root cause of the problem.

The government is the problem and is certainly not the solution. 

The rush to socialism in the form of a massive government intervention in the financial markets should be defeated not encouraged.

Let the discipline of the market place penalize those who were financially irresponsible.

No believer in free enterprise would propose or for that matter even consider President Bush’s bailout or rescue plan.

The same American elites of both political parties that tried to cram down comprehensive immigration reform with amnesty and open borders are now trying to cram down a comprehensive financial bailout of financial institutions.

Only you can prevent socialism in America.


Goodbye America, We’ll Miss You!


Background Articles and Videos 

Ron Paul and Peter Schiff – America Financial Meltdow


Lobbying for a bailout – Lou Dobbs



CNN McCain bailout fate


Senator Jim Bunning Comments on Federal Bailout


Hannity Colmes Newt Oppose This BailOut CALL Capitol


Shocking!—Democrats Trying to Give Bailout Money to Obama’s Owner ACORN


Newt Lays It Out – Part 1 of 3 – Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich says the bailout plan is a disaster.


Newt Lays It Out – Part 2 of 3 – Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich says the bailout plan is a disaster.


Newt Lays It Out – Part 3 of 3 – Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich says the bailout plan is a disaster.


Wall Street “Socialism”, the new moral hazard


Charlie Rose – Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac


Barack Obama & Friends Caused U.S. Economic Crisis


Bill Moyers Housing Market Meltdown 1 of 2


Bill Moyers Housing Market Meltdown 2 of 2


Ron Paul on the Global Financial Crisis


Ron Paul talks about Bernanke’s testimony



Majority of Americans oppose $700 billion bailout, poll finds,0,1707264.story 


To the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate:
As economists, we want to express to Congress our great concern for the plan proposed by Treasury Secretary Paulson to deal with the financial crisis. We are well aware of the difficulty of the current financial situation and we agree with the need for bold action to ensure that the financial system continues to function. We see three fatal pitfalls in the currently proposed plan:
1) Its fairness. The plan is a subsidy to investors at taxpayers’ expense. Investors who took risks to earn profits must also bear the losses.  Not every business failure carries systemic risk. The government can ensure a well-functioning financial industry, able to make new loans to creditworthy borrowers, without bailing out particular investors and institutions whose choices proved unwise.
2) Its ambiguity. Neither the mission of the new agency nor its oversight are clear. If  taxpayers are to buy illiquid and opaque assets from troubled sellers, the terms, occasions, and methods of such purchases must be crystal clear ahead of time and carefully monitored afterwards.
3) Its long-term effects.  If the plan is enacted, its effects will be with us for a generation. For all their recent troubles, America’s dynamic and innovative private capital markets have brought the nation unparalleled prosperity.  Fundamentally weakening those markets in order to calm short-run disruptions is desperately short-sighted.
For these reasons we ask Congress not to rush, to hold appropriate hearings, and to carefully consider the right course of action, and to wisely determine the future of the financial industry and the U.S. economy for years to come. 

Signed (updated at 9/25/2008 8:30AM CT) …”


Bailout: Opposition to Bush proposal among GOP lawmakers

“…Alabama Sen. Richard Shelby, the top Republican on the Senate Banking Committee, told NPR this morning that he wouldn’t vote for the proposal as it stands.

“I believe it will be reconfigured,” he says. One of Shelby’s biggest concerns is the lack of specifics about the plan’s overall cost. He says doing “nothing’s always an alternative.”

“I think they might pass something, but I don’t think we should just pass a three-page proposal and give this kind of power, unfettered power, to the secretary of the treasury — and with more to come probably,” Shelby says.

Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., an outspoken critic of the bailout, says he plans to slow down the bill.

“There’s no question we’ve got a big mess here. But I’ll tell you the one sure thing is this mess was caused by the government. They broke it. I don’t trust them to fix it at this point,” he tells Fox News. “I see this as a trillion dollar band-aid that’s designed to get people past the next election, but it is not going to solve our problem. I think it’s going to make it worse by expanding our national debt, lowering the value of our dollar.” …”


Kill the bailout: Newt Gingrich gets on board

By Michelle Malkin 

“I said it yesterday.

Newt Gingrich said it today.

Hans Bader sums it up succinctly: The Bush/Paulson bailout is “Inflationary, Unnecessary, and Unconstitutional.”

Yes, it’s time for ideological purity.

Kill it. …”


A Political “Solution”: Part II

by Thomas Sowell  

“…But bailing out people who made ill-advised mortgages makes no more sense that bailing out people who lost their life savings in Las Vegas casinos. It makes political sense only to people like Senator Dodd, who are among the reasons for the financial mess in the first place.

People usually stop making ill-advised decisions when they are forced to face the consequences of those decisions, not when politicians come to their rescue and make the taxpayers pay for decisions that the taxpayers had nothing to do with.

The Wall Street Journal, which has for years been sounding the alarm about the riskiness of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, recently cited Senator Christopher Dodd along with Senator Charles Schumer and Congressman Barney Frank among those on Capitol Hill who have been “shilling” for these financial institutions, downplaying the risks and opposing attempts to restrict their free-wheeling role in the mortgage market.

As recently as July of this year, Senator Dodd declared Fannie Mae and Freddie “fundamentally strong” and said there is no need for “panicking” about them. But now that the chickens have come home to roost, Senator Dodd wants to be sure to get some goodies from the rescue legislation to pass out to people likely to vote for him. …”


Laugh Line of The Day

By Michelle Malkin 

“…From Bush’s address to the nation tonight, urging taxpayers to fork over a trillion dollars to Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson to distribute to whichever failing banks he chooses, at home or abroad, in order to rescue them from their bottomless pit of toxic debt:

“I’m a strong believer in free enterprise.”  …”


Why Bailouts Scare Stocks

by Alan Reynolds

“…Owners of common stock are supposed to be last in line during an actual bankruptcy, getting leftover scraps after creditors pick a firm’s assets to the bone. But in anything short of that, patient stockholders stand a decent chance of eventually seeing some recovery in the share price, if and when the firm gets back on its feet.

And in the recent crises, bankruptcy was involved only in the case of Lehman – the one time the feds kept their hands off.

From Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson and Fed chief Ben Bernanke on down, top officials have shown too little confidence in markets and too much confidence in themselves. As a result, anyone who’s still holding stock in a financial firm now faces a big new risk premium – because these companies are now subject to compulsory mergers on unfavorable terms (as with Bear Stearns, where the feds initially tried to force stockholders to take just $2 a share) or quasi-nationalization.

This new risk of forced mergers or a government takeover artificially depresses the stock prices of vulnerable firms. And Standard and Poors incorporates equity prices into its credit ratings – so the risk can also bring a downgraded credit rating. And a credit-rating drop triggers regulations that oblige the company to increase its capital – while simultaneously making it nearly impossible to raise capital.

Heavy-handed federal bailouts started this mutually reinforcing spiral rolling downhill by scaring anyone still holding stock in similar firms. And other regulations make it more likely to end badly. …” 


‘Wall Street’ No Longer Exists

by Alan Reynolds

“…Since the 1933 regulatory wall has collapsed as definitively as the Berlin Wall, all the giant financial conglomerates now face oversight and regulation by the Federal Reserve, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Innocents who seek security in regulation need to recall, however, that not one of those august agencies exhibited timely foresight or concern about the default risk among even prime mortgages in some locations, or about any lack of transparency with respect to bundling mortgages into securities. People do not become wiser, more selfless or more omniscient simply because they work for government agencies.

Wall Street was always a metaphor, of course, but so are words like “bailout” and “toxic” debt. Nationalization of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac was a bailout for creditors (who received windfall gains), not for stockholders or executives. The federally enforced shotgun marriage between J.P. Morgan and Bear Stearns at the initially ridiculous price of $2 a share was no bailout for Bear. The 11.3% federal loan to AIG, contingent on the potential expropriation of 80% of shareholder value, is no bailout either.

By contrast, what was done to stop a run on the money-market funds is a real bailout which could encourage them to hold risky paper and also make it tougher for commercial banks to attract deposits. The proposal to buy up mortgage-backed securities is a bailout too, though the beneficiaries are not just the tattered remains of Wall Street. The bailout consists of shifting the risk of loss to taxpayers. Actual losses could not reach $700 billion unless the securities were literally worthless, which would mean the value of the underlying real estate fell to zero.

What was “toxic” for investment banks is not equally toxic for the Treasury Department because the government does not even bother to keep a balance sheet, much less abide by mark-to-market accounting rules. A powerful motive for converting investment banks into commercial banks is to get around those onerous balance-sheet rules that required fire-sale pricing of securities that were virtually unmarketable during a panicky scramble for liquidity. Strict adherence to those rules made patience a vice and a “buy and hold” approach impossible. This confirms what many of us have long been saying about the foolishness of letting arbitrary bookkeeping rules dominate economic reality.

Turning Wall Street into a bunch of commercial banks is a solution of sorts to a problem aggravated by foolish mark-to-market regulations, not by the inevitable demise of the 1933 wall between investment banks and commercial banks. Something good may yet come out of all this, because that wall never made much sense in the first place. …”


The Financial Bailout (and the New Resolution Trust Corp.) Must Restore the Markets and Protect the Taxpayer

by David C. John

“…The House and Senate must have two objectives when putting together their versions of the financial bailout proposal made by the Treasury and Federal Reserve: They must (1) restore the markets and (2) protect the taxpayers. Congress should act clearly and decisively to address the turmoil in the financial markets and not burden this legislation with other issues, problems, or projects.

These objectives should be resolved in the regular order of business. This legislation must not become a Christmas tree. If it does, it will likely backfire, and the intentions of either or both objectives will fail. Sadly, the Senate’s version is already on the wrong track, and the House’s is likely to follow suit. …”


No bailout necessary

Earl Thompson 

“…Our country’s leading financial officials (the heads of our Department of Treasury and Federal Reserve Bank) have proposed to bail out an enormous array of overpaid wall street phonies in order to become a foreclosing creditor for 700 billion dollars worth of real estate debt — even though they know nothing whatever about collecting or foreclosing on non-performing real estate debt. They cannot possibly do their traditional jobs, which they have normally done quite respectably, under such an administrative burden. The mess would continue, perhaps even worsen.
All the Fed Chairman has to do is do is spend half that amount of fresh Federal Reserve Notes on U.S. Government Bonds and stop making a fool of himself by begging Congress for a favor that would just create a nightmare for him, and ergo the rest of us. What that simple inflationary monetary shock would do is immediately increase the U.S. price-level by just about 20%. The dollar would sink that much in the world’s money markets and this would (1) stimulate our economy out of its current recessionary threat; (2) raise the value of real estate by 20% and immediately end the wave of current real estate foreclosures; and (3) immediately restore liquidity and financial flexibility to our banks and financial institutions so as to end our current financial woes on the spot. …”

More on the diversity racket and the home loan debacle

By Michelle Malkin  


“…Referencing my column yesterday on illegal immigration and the mortgage mess, Hans Bader at Open Market shares his experience. I’ve been getting a lot of e-mails with similar stories. Tip of the iceberg:

When I and my wife, a legal alien, bought our house, the mortgage company told me that if my wife were an illegal alien, rather than legal, we would have qualified for certain loan programs with big banks. But because she was a legal alien waiting for her green-card (which she had recently applied for), we didn’t qualify.

Mark Krikorian, an activist against illegal immigration, argues that “we’re in this mess, ultimately, because our political elites thought it was good social policy to encourage banks to give mortgages to uncreditworthy people, resulting in what Sailer months ago called the “Diversity Recession” (if this doesn’t work, make that the Diversity Depression). In other words, if poor people in general, or blacks or Hispanics in particular, were less likely to be approved for a mortgage, the only possible reason was racism or classism or whatever. Thus ‘creditworthiness’ was an illegitimate, dead-white-male concept, like middleclassness. Because, after all, isn’t everyone entitled to credit?” …”

A Bailout We Don’t Need

By James K. Galbraith

“…Is this bailout still necessary?

The point of the bailout is to buy assets that are illiquid but not worthless. But regular banks hold assets like that all the time. They’re called “loans.”

With banks, runs occur only when depositors panic, because they fear the loan book is bad. Deposit insurance takes care of that. So why not eliminate the pointless $100,000 cap on federal deposit insurance and go take inventory? If a bank is solvent, money market funds would flow in, eliminating the need to insure those separately. If it isn’t, the FDIC has the bridge bank facility to take care of that.

Next, put half a trillion dollars into the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. fund — a cosmetic gesture — and as much money into that agency and the FBI as is needed for examiners, auditors and investigators. Keep $200 billion or more in reserve, so the Treasury can recapitalize banks by buying preferred shares if necessary — as Warren Buffett did this week with Goldman Sachs. Review the situation in three months, when Congress comes back. Hedge funds should be left on their own. You can’t save everyone, and those investors aren’t poor. …”

Glenn Beck Explains Fannie & Freddie & Racism & Extortion


Kudlow & Company, September 22, 2008


Bernie Sanders “You’re a socialist, Larry [Kudlow]” w Allard


Dodd and Kyle on the Bailout Package (part 1)


Dodd and Kyle on the Bailout Package (part 2)


Bernanke Warns Congress of Possible Recession


Dick Armey Discusses the Dodd/Frank Bailout Bill


Deconstructing the Subprime Crisis


Richard Herring on Mortgage-backed Securities


Joseph Gyourko on Fannie, Freddie, and the Housing Bust


Franklin Allen on Past Crises


Franklin Allen on Lessons from the Subprime Crisis


Jeremy Siegel on the Resilience of American Finance


Susan Wachter on Securitizations and Deregulation


See I.O.U.S.A. themovie, visit the YouTube site


IOUSA Live – Panel Discusses our Fiscal Crisis


Buffett on Fannie / Freddie and Oil


Wall Street’s Day of Reckoning: The Fannie & Freddie Bailout


Housing Bailout For Deadbeats Gamblers Liars Thieves



Part 1 – Exposing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac: Origins

New York Investing meetup organizer Daryl Montgomery discusses the origins of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in the first episode of a multi-part series. The New York Investing meetup is an organization of 1800 independent traders and investors that provides unbiased stock market education and analysis. We also have a blog,”The Helicopter Economics Investing Guide” which can be found at:


Part 2 – Exposing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac: Origins


Part 3 – Exposing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac: Origins


Part 4 – Exposing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac: Origins


Part 5 – Exposing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac: Origins


The Big Lie – The U.S. GDP Figures


Ron Paul vs. Ben Bernanke


Constitution Rally4Republic



Democrats responsible for Economic Disaster…


Solution to Our Economic Problems…


We’ve been lied to AGAIN…


Related Posts On Pronk Palisades


Obama–ACORN–CRA–Congress–Democratic Party–Fannie Mae–Freddie Mac–Bailout–Socialism– Just Say No!

Senator McCain Takes Cheap Shot At Securities And Exchange Commission (SEC) Chairman Chris Cox

Guys and Gals Gaga and Giddy Over Governor Sarah Palin 

New Poll: McCain/Palin Will Win 50 States!–Obama/Biden Will Win 57 States?

Sweet Sarah Palin Knocks Out Bitter Barack Obama

Knight of Faith Sarah Palin vs. Knight of Infinity Barack Obama

Presidential Election 2008: American Elites Vs. American People

Let Them Eat Cake Act: American Elites Killing and Starving The American People

Saving The World: The Importance of Getting The Priorities Right

McCain: Cut–Drill–Victory vs. Obama: Increase–Talk–End

The Unsinkable Sarah Palin for The American People vs. Condescending Charlie Gibson for The American Elites

New Poll: McCain/Palin Will Win 50 States!–Obama/Biden Will Win 57 States?

Slugger McCain Hits a Grand Slam Homerun: Selects Alaskian Governor Sarah Palin as Vice-President Running Mate!

The 2008 U.S. Presidential Election–Wedge Issues Now (WIN)?

The American People: Start Drilling and Control The Border. When? Now!

The Movement Conservatives Will Rock You Obama!

Voters Beware: The Radical Rules of Saul Alinsky and Leftist Democrats

2008 Presidential Choice: Leader or Diletant–McCain or Obama

Barrack Obama’s Kansas Values–Killing Babies in Cold Blood?

Comrade Barack Obama–Arrogant Elitist Socialist–US Job Destroyer and Economy Wrecker

Obama: Pump Up Your Tires–Main Stream Media: Pumps Up Obama

Identity Politics: Blacks, Lesbians, Gays, Bisexuals and Transsexuals for Obama?

Barack Obama: The First Previable Puppet Presidential Candidate!

Barack Obama–A Reader Not A Leader!

Barack Obama: A Watermelon Man–Green on The Outside–Red on The Inside

Barack Obama–Damaged Goods–Birds of A Feather Flock Together

The Issue of The United States 2008 Presidential Election–Criminal Alien Removal (CAR) and A Border Security Fence (BSF)

Clear, Hold, Build– Strategy for Victory In Iraq–Now Ready for Prime Time in America– Operation Criminal Alien Removal (CAR)!

Appeasers and Oath Breakers All: Bush, Clinton, Bush, McCain, Clinton, Obama…Who is next?

Why immigration will be the number 1 political issue in the 2008 Presidential Election! — Gum Balls

Presidential Candidates on Illegal Immigration, Criminal Alien Removal and Social Service Benefits

The Cost of Comprehensive Immigration Reform–McCain and Obama Are Hopeless–It is the Economy Stupid!

Presidential Election 2008: American Elites Vs. American People

Alan Keyes on Immigration

US Immigration Videos   

Unconstrained Obama vs. Constrained McCain: A Conflict of Vision

Let Them Eat Cake Act: American Elites Killing and Starving The

Obama and McCain–Socialism and Appeasement!

Senator Obama: The Experience Challenged Candidate of Change

Clinton’s Cap and Trade Tax on The American People for Consuming Electricity and Driving Cars, SUVs and Trucks!

Facing Fundamental Facts

Presidential Election 2008: American Elites Vs. American People

Let Them Eat Cake Act: American Elites Killing and Starving The American People 

Clinton’s Cap and Trade Tax on The American People for Consuming Electricity and Driving Cars, SUVs and Trucks!

Facing Fundamental Facts

Presidential Election 2008: American Elites Vs. American People

Let Them Eat Cake Act: American Elites Killing and Starving The American People

Saving The World: The Importance of Getting The Priorities Right

McCain: Cut–Drill–Victory vs. Obama: Increase–Talk–End

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( 14 so far )

Liked it here?
Why not try sites on the blogroll...