America Held Hostage: President Obama Holds The Security of American People Hostage For Amnesty of Illegal Aliens a.k.a. Comprehensive Immigration Reform–Impeach and Convict President Obama For Betraying Oath Of Office

Posted on June 24, 2010. Filed under: Blogroll, Communications, Crime, Demographics, Economics, Education, Employment, Federal Government, Fiscal Policy, Foreign Policy, government, government spending, history, Immigration, Language, Law, liberty, Life, Links, media, Medicine, People, Philosophy, Politics, Quotations, Rants, Raves, Regulations, Resources, Taxes, Technology, Transportation, Video, Wisdom | Tags: , , , , , , , |

 

 

 

OBAMA: AMNESTY by EXECUTIVE ORDER for 18 Million Illegal Immigrants!!!! 

  

Arizona Sen. Kyl : Obama said he would not secure border without immigration reform first

Lou Dobbs Comments On Sen. Kyl On Hannity!

Obama using border security as a bargaining chip? Part 2

Alex Covers Sen. Kyle’s Comment About Why Obama Won’t Send Troops to The Border

  

Why Obama Won’t Secure the Border

Who’s a liar? Senator Kyle or President Obama?

Obama Double Talk, Caught In A Lie, Illegals and Healthcare Health Care, Immigration Reform Fox

  

Obama Lies 7 Times In Under 2 Minutes!

Obama’s Health Care Lies And Reversals

Barack Obama Lies To America

Obama’s Insane Lies

CNN – Obama on illegal immigration

Obama Administration to File Suit Against Arizona Immigration Law

Arizona Gov. Brewer upset with Obama Admin. suit over Arizona’s SB 1070

  

Standing up for Jobless Hispanic Americans

Immigration Gumballs


Comprehensive immigration reform is a code word for amnesty for illegal aliens which President Obama fully supports. 

President Obama is seriously considering issuing an executive order that would give nearly 20 million illegal aliens amnesty and eventually full U.S. citizenship.

Should President Obama actually go forward with such an order, he would guarantee the defeat of most Democratic Party candidates running for reelection in 2010 and 2012 as well as his own impeachment and conviction under the U.S. Constitution.

Sudden Impact – “Go Ahead. Make My Day”

Since over three out four voters oppose illegal immigration, one only wonders why does President Obama want to commit political suicide?

Obama = Amnesty For Illegal Aliens

 

Has President Obama suddenly realized that he is not up to the job and more and more Americans are coming to the same conclusion. 

There are over 30 million American citizens looking for a full-time job and over 40 million receiving food stamps or a supplemental nutrition assistance program (SNAP) card. 

There are over 30 million illegal aliens living and working in the United States. 

There are over 15 million American citizens officially unemployed in the United States with the real number over 25 million unemployed. 

There are between 10 million and 20 million illegal aliens employed at jobs that Americans need, want and should have. 

During the worse month of the Great Depression in 1933 there were over 13 million Americans unemployed. 

Instead of enforcing U.S. immigration laws and removing illegal aliens from the workplace and deporting them back to the their country of origin, President Obama is holding the American people hostage. 

President Obama will not stop the invasion of the United States by illegal aliens by securing the American borders until the illegal aliens living and working here now are given amnesty under a comprehensive immigration reform bill. 

For this alone President Obama should be impeached and convicted. 

President Obama’s own Secretary of Labor is aiding and abetting illegal immigration with this commercial. 

Obama’s DOL Secretary Hilda L. Solis: You Have the Right to Be Paid Fairly Whether Documented or Not

http://hotair.com/archives/2010/06/21/obama-wh-to-illegals-well-help-you-get-paid-fairly/ 

The only right an illegal alien has when they break into the United States, obtain fraudulent documents, and work here illegallly  is to be removed from the workplace, arrested and deported to their country of origin. 

The American employers that benefit from hiring illegal aliens should be prosecuted as well. 

The American people believe Senator Kyl. 

The American people do not believe, trust nor respect President Obama. 

Why? 

President Obama has a justly deserved reputation for being an habitual liar. 

President Obama’s refusal to vigorously enforce United States immigration law that he is required to do is legal grounds for impeachment under the United States Constitution. 

President Obama should be impeached and convicted for not defending the Constitution of The United States of America which requires him to defend the states when they are invaded. 

How many more millions of illegal alien invaders must the American people endure before removing a President of the United States who refuses to enforce immigration laws and defend America’s sovereignty and secure the borders? 

How many days will America Be Held Hostage by a President who is more concerned about amnesty and citizenship for illegal aliens than the safety and security of the American people? 

How many more millions of American citizens will be unemployed before Congress impeaches and the Senate convicts President Obama according to the process setforth in the United States Constitution? 

Employ American Citizens–No Amnesty For Illegal Aliens–Impeach and Convict Obama!

  

 

 

Background Articles and Videos

Stop Amnesty for Illegal Immigrants – Expert Reveals the True Cost of Amnesty

 

 

The Dangers of Unlimited Legal & Illegal Immigration

Support a Moratorium on All Immigration, Legal and Illegal

Ambassador Alan Keyes on Stopping Illegal Immigration

Rush Limbaugh on Illegal Immigration

US Government is MUY LOCO…

Illegal Immigration Perks…

We Need an American President…

MICHAEL SAVAGE – IMPEACH OBAMA NOW!!! BEFORE IT’S TOO LATE!!! BEFORE AMERICA IS FINISHED!!

Senators Challenge Pres. Obama on Rumors of Amnesty Thorugh Executive Actions

“…Several Senators have learned of a possible plan by the Obama Administration that would provide a mass Amnesty for the nation’s 11-18 million illegal aliens. Led by Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), eight Senators addressed a letter to the President asking for answers to questions about a plan that would allow DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano to provide an amnesty if they can’t secure enough votes for a bill in the Senate. …” 

“…Here is the text of the letter signed by Sens. Grassley, Hatch (R-Utah), Vitter (R-La.), Bunning (R-Ky.), Chambliss (R-Ga.), Isakson (R-Ga.), Inhofe (R-Okla.), and Cochran (R-Miss.). 

Dear President Obama: 

We understand that there’s a push for your Administration to develop a plan to unilaterally extend either deferred action or parole to millions of illegal aliens in the United States. We understand that the Administration may include aliens who have willfully overstayed their visas or filed for benefits knowing that they will not be eligible for a status for years to come. We understand that deferred action and parole are discretionary actions reserved for individual cases that present unusual, emergent or humanitarian circumstances. Deferred action and parole were not intended to be used to confer a status or offer protection to large groups of illegal aliens, even if the agency claims that they look at each case on a “case-by-case” basis. 

While we agree our immigration laws need to be fixed, we are deeply concerned about the potential expansion of deferred action or parole for a large illegal alien population. While deferred action and parole are Executive Branch authorities, they should not be used to circumvent Congress’ constitutional authority to legislate immigration policy, particularly as it relates to the illegal population in the United States. 

The Administration would be wise to abandon any plans for deferred action or parole for the illegal population. Such a move would further erode the American public’s confidence in the federal government and its commitment to securing the borders and enforcing the laws already on the books. 

We would appreciate receiving a commitment that the Administration has no plans to use either authority to change the current position of a large group of illegal aliens already in the United States, and ask that you respond to us about this matter as soon as possible. …” 

http://www.numbersusa.com/content/news/june-21-2010/senators-challenge-pres-obama-rumors-executive-order-amnesty.html 

 

  

58% Say No to Citizenship for Children of Illegal Immigrants

“…Fifty-eight percent (58%) of U.S. voters say a child born to an illegal immigrant in this country should not automatically become a citizen of the United States, according to a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey. 

Thirty-three percent (33%) disagree and say if a women enters the United States as an illegal alien and gives birth to a child here, that child should automatically be a U.S. citizen. That’s what the current law allows and many believe it would require a Constitutional Amendment to change the law. 

Voter sentiments are basically unchanged from four years ago when the Senate was considering the immigration issue. The Senate was eventually forced to drop its plans and surrender to public opinion on the topic. 

On another aspect of the debate, voters overwhelmingly oppose allowing illegal immigrants to be eligible for state and federal government benefits. Just nine percent (9%) say illegals should receive such benefits, but 85% say they should not. …” 

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/immigration/58_say_no_to_citizenship_for_children_of_illegal_immigrants 

Impeachment: The Unthinkable Process

“…Impeachable Offenses 

Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution says, “The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.” In his report, Independent Counsel, Starr accuses President Clinton of committing eleven acts for which he could be removed from office by impeachment. Are any of those acts “Treason, Bribery, or other High Crimes and Misdemeanors?” Well, that’s up to the members of the House of Representatives. According to Constitutional Lawyers, “High Crimes and Misdemeanors” are (1) real criminality — breaking a law; (2) abuses of power; (3) “violation of public trust” as defined by Alexander Hamilton in the Federalist Papers. In 1970, then Representative Gerald R. Ford defined impeachable offenses as “whatever a majority of the House of Representatives considers it to be at a given moment in history.” An excellent definition, Mr. Former President. In the past, Congress has issued Articles of Impeachment for acts in three general categories: 

  • Behavior grossly incompatible with the proper function and purpose of the office.
  • Employing the power of the office for an improper purpose or for personal gain.

  

http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/thepresidentandcabinet/a/impeachment.htm 

End Illegal Immigration

“…POLLS AND SURVEYS

Seventy-eight percent (78%) of likely voters were opposed to legalizing the status of the estimated 12 million illegal immigrants in the U.S. with only 19% supporting it. 88% of African-Americans were opposed to legalization. Pulse Opinion Research, LLC, September, 2009

71% of Americans want to see the bosses who hire illegal immigrants arrested while 64 percent support police conducting surprise raids on businesses suspected of hiring illegal immigrants (The Raids Obama has stopped) Rasmussen Reports poll, October, 2009

80 percent of U.S. voters oppose proposals for government-backed health-care plans for illegal immigrants Rasmussen Reports poll, June, 2009

78 percent of Americans believe that high immigration numbers have had a negative impact on the cost and quality of the nation’s health care system and 78% of likely voters were opposed to legalizing the status of the estimated 12 million illegal immigrants in the U.S. American Council for Immigration Reform, September, 2009

73% of Americans called for a drop in the number of illegal immigrants CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll, October, 2009.

58% of Arizona voters say the policies and activities of Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio have had a positive impact on the state’s image, [May 2009, Rasmussen Reports]

74% of Americans think the government is not doing enough to keep illegal immigrants from coming into this country, [Washington Post-ABC News poll, April 2009]

66% of likely voters nationwide say it is Very Important for the government to improve its enforcement of the borders and reduce illegal immigration, [April 2009, Rasmussen Reports]

73% of U.S. voters believe that a police officer should automatically check to see if someone is in this country legally when the officer pulls that person over for a traffic violation, [March 2009, Rasmussen Reports]

67% of voters also say that if law enforcement officers know of places where immigrants gather to find work, they should sometimes conduct surprise raids to identify and deport illegal immigrants,[March 2009, Rasmussen Reports]

68% of Arizona voters have a favorable view of Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio, [March 2009, Rasmussen Reports]

68% of U.S. voters favor strict government sanctions on employers who hire illegal immigrants, [March 2009, Rasmussen Reports]

62% of New Jersey Residents oppose offering illegal immigrants some type of driver’s licenses. Just 33% favor this proposal, [March 2009, Monmouth University/Gannett New Jersey Poll]

Only 20% of New Jersey residents favor extending in-state college tuition rates to undocumented immigrants living in the state compared to 37% who say illegal immigrants should pay higher out-of-state rates. 39% say that illegal immigrants should not even be allowed to attend New Jersey’s public colleges and universities at all, [March 2009, Monmouth University/Gannett New Jersey Poll]

78% of registered Utah voters want to see SB81 implemented. The bill would, among other provisions, require all companies that contract with the state to check the immigration status of their employees and allow local police to enforce immigration law, [January 2009, The Salt Lake Tribune]

74% of U.S. voters continue to believe the federal government is not doing enough to secure the country’s borders, [December 2008, Rasmussen Reports]

63% of voters say gaining control of the border is more important than legalizing the status of undocumented workers in the country, [December 2008, Rasmussen Reports]

Only 32% of Obama voters considered his support for amnesty as a factor in their decisions to vote for him. 67% said it was either not a factor at all, or they voted for Obama in spite of his stance on amnesty, [November 2008, Zogby Interactive Survey of Likely Voters]

60% of voters said reducing illegal immigration and cracking down on employers who hire them is important to them, while only 21% supported “legalizing or creating a pathway to citizenship” for illegal aliens, [November 2008, Zogby Interactive Survey of Likely Voters]

Transatlantic Trends: when asked about what governments should do to address illegal immigration, 83% of respondents supported stronger border controls, 74% supported cracking down on employers, and 68% supported deportation, [November 2008, TNS Opinion]

71.5% of likely voters said they agree (including 47.8% who strongly agree) that local law enforcement officers should enforce federal immigration laws, including 51.5% of Hispanics and 56.2% of self-described “liberals.” [October 2008, Judicial Watch/Zogby International]

57.1% of likely voters said more law enforcement is needed to address the issue of illegal immigration while only 7.1% said they believe less law enforcement should be used. 34.7% of Hispanics support more law enforcement while 15.5% said less, [October 2008, Judicial Watch/ Zogby International]

69% of voters say controlling the border is more important than legalizing the status of undocumented workers, while just 21% think legalization is more important, [August 2008, Rasmussen Reports]

Ohio voters prefer strict enforcement over integration of illegal immigrants 71 – 20 % and 22% say they would vote against a candidate who disagrees with them only on the immigration issue, [December 2007, Quinnipiac University poll]

77% of American voters say companies should be allowed to require employees to speak English while on the job, [November 2007, Rasmussen Reports]

77% of American adults are opposed to making drivers licenses available to people who are in the country illegally, [November 2007, Rasmussen Reports]

Only 22% of voters support the Dream Act proposal introduced by Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL) and 59% of all voters oppose the Dream Act concept, [October 2007, Rasmussen Reports]

68% of North Carolinians disagree (including 41.6% who strongly disagree) with proposals that would allow undocumented immigrants to stay in this country for several years as long as they have a job, [September 2007, Elon University Poll]

58% of voters nationwide favor cutting off federal funds for “sanctuary cities” that offer protection to illegal immigrants, [August 2007, Rasmussen Reports]

79% of American adults favor a proposal requiring employers to fire workers who falsify identity documents, [August 2007, Rasmussen Reports]

Just 22% of American voters currently favor the “comprehensive” immigration reform bill in the U.S. Senate despite a despite a massive White House effort, [June 2007, Rasmussen Reports]

2007 Senate amnesty bill: just 16% of American voters believe illegal immigration will decline if the bill is passed. If voters had a chance to improve the legislation, 75% would make changes to increase border security measures and reduce illegal immigration and just 19% would make it easier for illegal immigrants to stay in the country and eventually become citizens, [May 2007, Rasmussen Reports]

When presented by itself, 79% of likely voters supported reducing the illegal immigrant population by increasing border enforcement, penalizing employers, and increasing cooperation with local law enforcement, while 15 percent were opposed. No other proposal had near this level of support, [May 2007, Pulse Opinion Research]

Which approach do you prefer – enforcing the law and cause illegal immigrants to go home over time or granting legal status and citizenship to those who meet certain requirements? 56% prefer “Enforce the law” while 35% prefer “Grant legal status.” [May 2007, Pulse Opinion Research]

58% of likely voters prefer that the 12 million illegal immigrants in the country go home as opposed to 30% who prefer they be allowed to stay legally, [May 2007, Pulse Opinion Research]

59% of Americans believe the more effective way to deal with the potential treat to national security posed by millions of illegal immigrants living within the United States is to crack down on illegal immigration by toughening the enforcement of existing laws, deporting illegal immigrants and prosecuting the employers who illegally employ workers, [April 2007, UPI/Zogby Poll]

61% of likely American voters oppose providing a path to US citizenship for those illegal immigrants who entered the United States illegally, and who fraudulently obtained green cards and Social Security numbers, when millions are playing by the rules and waiting in their countries to enter the United States legally, [April 2007, McLaughlin & Associates Poll]

A poll of likely voters, using neutral language, found that Americans prefer the House of Representatives’ enforcement-only bill by 2-1 over Senate proposals to legalize illegal immigrants and greatly increase legal immigration, [April 2006, Zogby America] …”

http://www.endillegalimmigration.com/illegal_immigration_polls_surveys/index.shtml

Ray Stevens – Come to the USA

 

Related Posts On Pronk Palisades

Immigration

What Is Commander-In-Chief Obama’s Battle Plan For Stopping and Reversing The Invasion Of The United State of America By 30 Million Illegal Aliens–Unconditional Surrender!

Open Your Eyes To The Consequences Of Open Borders In Just One State–Join The Second American Revolution

Your Papers Please–Progressive Radical Socialist Democratic and Republican Senators Proposed National ID Card–Vote These Bums Out Of Office–Time For Operation Wetback II

Cheap Tomatoes, Cheap Labor, Criminal Aliens, Corrupt Polticians, Costing Trillions–Cradle To Grave Progressive Radical Socialism!

Obama Aids and Abets Illegal Immigration and High American Citizen Unemployment By Attacking Arizona State Law!

American Citizens Want Jobs and Criminal Alien Removal, Not Criminal Alien Census and Health Care!

Broom Budget Busting Bums: Replace The Entire Congress–Tea Party Express and Patriots–United We Stand!

Discover The Left’s Organized Crime Network–Crime Pays–Organized Crimes Pays More–Apply for Census Taker Jobs!

US Immigration Videos

Borderline Chaos: Immigration Out of Control–Videos

The Hyphenated American and The Hyphen

The Signed “Stimulus Package” Did Not Include Funding for E-Verify and Border Fence Construction–Less Jobs And Security for American Citizens

President Obama Delays E-Verify–Shame On You Mr. President!

The Issue of The United States 2008 Presidential Election–Criminal Alien Removal (CAR) and A Border Security Fence (BSF)

The Cost of Comprehensive Immigration Reform–McCain and Obama Are Hopeless–It is the Economy Stupid!

Appeasers and Oath Breakers All: Bush, Clinton, Bush, McCain, Clinton, Obama…Who is next?

Why immigration will be the number 1 political issue in the 2008 Presidential Election! — Gum Balls

Presidential Candidates on Illegal Immigration, Criminal Alien Removal and Social Service Benefits

John McCain’s Position on Illegal Immigration and Criminal Alien Removal?

Alan Keyes on Immigration

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

Republican Health Care Reform: The Patients’ Choice Act

Posted on July 21, 2009. Filed under: Blogroll, Economics, Fiscal Policy, government spending, Health Care, Links, Medicine, People, Philosophy, Politics, Quotations, Rants, Raves, Regulations, Science, Taxes, Technology, Video, Wisdom | Tags: , , , , , |

Jon Kyl Delivers Weekly Republican Address on Health Care

 

The Patients’ Choice Act (1 of 4) Press Conference (Senator Burr and Congressman Ryan)

 

The Patients’ Choice Act (2 of 4) Press Conference (Congressman Nunes and Senator Coburn)

 

The Patients’ Choice Act (3 of 4) Press Conference

 

The Patients’ Choice Act (4 of 4) Press Conference

 

The Patients’ Choice Act

http://coburn.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Files.View&FileStore_id=d4eab376-d507-4fb9-9f17-8b479a10affc

 

Background Articles and Videos

 

Patients’ Choice Act Moves Debate in a Market-Friendly Direction

“…Reforming Tax Treatment

A key feature of the Patients’ Choice Act is a $5,700 annual tax credit for families ($2,300 for individuals) designed to cover employees’ out-of-pocket share of employer-sponsored health plans—an average annual cost of $4,200 per family.

The provision is similar to Sen. John McCain’s (R-AZ) campaign proposal to reform the tax treatment of health insurance by offering tax credits to help workers afford their choice of health coverage. But the Patients’ Choice Act doesn’t alter the tax code for employers, meaning businesses won’t see their tax burdens spike as a result of their employees’ newfound freedom to choose their own health care plans.

Peter Orszag, director of the Office of Management and Budget, explained the benefit to be gained from revising the federal government’s tax treatment of employer health plans in testimony before the Senate Finance Committee in June 2008.

“Imagine what the world would be like if workers [understood] that today it was costing them $10,000 a year in take-home pay for their employer-sponsored insurance, and that could be $7,000 and they could have $3,000 more in their pockets today if we could relieve these inefficiencies out of the health system,” Orszag said.

The Republicans’ plan would increase workers’ take-home pay and decrease their tax burdens, allowing them to better afford the health insurance policy and benefits of their choice. …”

“…The Patients’ Choice Act is light-years ahead of the government-run alternatives being championed by Obama and the Senate Democrats.

The willingness to attack the currently problematic tax treatment of health care and help poor Americans divorce their medical fates from the whims of government bureaucrats is a giant leap in the right direction.”

http://www.heartland.org/full/25700/Patients_Choice_Act_Moves_Debate_in_a_MarketFriendly_Direction.html

 

Heartland Institute

Overview: Health Care Policy and Freedom

http://www.heartland.org/suites/health%20care/

 

Nunes talks healthcare on the Fox Business Network

 

Patients’ Choice Health Care Act Explained – Paul Ryan

 

RNC Chairman Michael Steele to Joe Scarborough: “Spare Me”

Sean Hannity: LA Gov. Bobby Jindal Says “No” to Barack Obama Health Care Proposal [FOX News]

 

Ron Paul on Healthcare Reform

 

 

Related Posts On Pronk Palisades

Medical Doctor and Senator Tom Coburn On Health Care–Videos

The Senate Doctors Show–Videos

Obama’s Waterloo– Government Compulsory Single Payer Socialized Medicine!–Videos

President Obama’s Plan of Massive Deficit Spending Is Destroying The US Economy–The American People Say Stop Socialism BS Now!

The Bum’s Rush of The American People: The Totally Irresponsible Democratic Party Health Care Bill and Obama’s Big Lie Exposed

Chairman Obama’s Progressive Radical Socialist Health Care Bill Kills Individual Private Health Care Insurance–Join The Second American Revolution!

The Obama Big Lie and Inconvenient Truth About Health Care–The Public Option Trojan Horse–Leads To A Single Payor Goverment Monopoly of Health Care and The Bankruptcy of USA!

The Obama Public Option Poison Pill For A Government Health Care Monopoly–Single Payer System–Betting Your Life and Paying Though The Nose

Government Bureaucracy: Organizational Chart of The House Democrats’ Health Plan

Dr. Robert W. Christensen–Videos

John Stossel–Sick In America–Videos

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( 46 so far )

Liked it here?
Why not try sites on the blogroll...