Ralph Raico–The Case For An America First Foreign Policy–Videos

Posted on March 23, 2012. Filed under: American History, Blogroll, College, Communications, Economics, Education, Federal Government, Federal Government Budget, Fiscal Policy, Foreign Policy, government, government spending, history, Language, Law, liberty, Life, Links, media, People, Philosophy, Politics, Rants, Raves, Tax Policy, Unemployment, Video, War, Wealth, Wisdom | Tags: , , , , , , , , |

Ralph Raico at FFF Conference, Part 1 of 7

Ralph Raico at FFF Conference, Part 2 of 7

Ralph Raico at FFF Conference, Part 3 of 7

Ralph Raico at FFF Conference, Part 4 of 7

Ralph Raico at FFF Conference, Part 5 of 7

Ralph Raico at FFF Conference, Part 6 of 7

Ralph Raico at FFF Conference, Part 7 of 7

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

Michele Bachmann Closet Neoconservative Attacks Ron Paul–Go Back Into The Closet–Video

Posted on December 21, 2011. Filed under: American History, Blogroll, Communications, Diasters, Economics, Education, Employment, Energy, Federal Government, Foreign Policy, government spending, history, Inflation, Investments, Language, Law, liberty, Links, media, Natural Gas, Nuclear Power, Oil, People, Philosophy, Politics, Rants, Raves, Talk Radio, Video, War, Wealth, Wisdom | Tags: , , , , , , , , , |

Ron Paul vs. Michele Bachmann on Iran Fox Iowa Debate 12-15-11

Ron Paul Ad – Secure

Ron Paul – Imagine – Kinetic Typography 

Ron Paul: What If? (speech on House floor 2/12/09) 

Update from Congresswoman Michele Bachmann on Israel 

Ron Paul Interview w/ Jack Hunter on Foreign Policy & Israel 

Ron Paul  – “The one who can beat Obama”

Ron Paul wants to secure America’s borders and not Israel’s borders and Saudi’s borders by going to war with Iran.

The American people are finally waking up to this fact and the neconservatives, Israeli lobby and the Government of Israel do not want Ron Paul to be president.

I used to think that Ron Paul was going to choose Michele Bachmann as his running mate.

Not any more.

Bachmann’s problem is she believes what her staff and advisers tell her without doing her own homework and challenging them.

Zionist neoconservatives behind the fradulant IAEA report on Iran

Ron Paul vs. Michele Bachmann on Iran Fox Iowa Debate 12-15-11

Ron Paul On The Tonight Show With Jay Leno Part 2 (12/16/2011) 

Bachmann should have remained focused on attacking the two progressive/neoconservative candidates, Romney and Gingrich.

Instead she decided to go after Paul over Iran.

Paul will respond to her attacks by attacking the neoconservative warmongering over Iran by Romney,  Gingrich, Perry and Santorium.

Ron Paul Attacks Gingrich…AGAIN!

Newt Gingrich: Serial Hypocrisy

Ron Paul Ad – Consistent

Sometimes she has her facts straight, many times she does not.

She is simply not ready for prime time.

Iran has been attacking the United States via proxies for over thirty years.

The question is what exactly does the U.S. do about it.

Start World War III. I think not.

Covert operations to support those wanting to overthrow the current regime is by far the better option.

Ron Paul understands this, even if Bachmann does not.

Bachmann would be more useful to the tea party movement if she went after the progressives including Romney, Gingrich and Perry.

Instead she attacks the one person in the race that the tea party and independents would support.

Bachmann will be lucky to come in fourth or fifth in Iowa.

I suspect she has just come out of the closet as a neoconservative warmonger.

Unfortunately for her this is a very crowded field which the American people are rejecting.

Tea Party Diva Bachmann Attacks Ron Paul on Iran During Iowa Debate

Ron Paul vs. Michelle Bachmann

Ron Paul on foreign policy – Tea Party Debate – Analysis by Michael Scheuer 

Ron Paul Schools Rick Santorum On Iran And Foreign Policy

CIA  – Iranian Terror Plot: Who & Why?

CIA Agent Exposes How Al-Qaeda Dosen’t Exist   

Ron Paul’s Secretary of State Michael Scheuer

Michael Scheuer – “Israel Is Spying On The U.S., Stealing Technology & Bribing Congress”

Michael Scheuer Foreign Policy Discussion 

No Country Has The Right To Exist! Michael Scheuer Fmr CIA Bin Laden Unit Chief pt.1

No Country Has The Right To Exist! Michael Scheuer Fmr CIA Bin Laden Unit Chief pt.2    

No Country Has The Right To Exist! Michael Scheuer Fmr CIA Bin Laden Unit Chief pt.3

 

No Country Has The Right To Exist! Michael Scheuer Fmr CIA Bin Laden Unit Chief pt.4

No Country Has The Right To Exist! Michael Scheuer Fmr CIA Bin Laden Unit Chief pt.5

Related Posts On Pronk Palisades

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

Israeli Brainwashed Glenn Beck’s Confused Hit Piece On Ron Paul–Get A Clue–Videos

Posted on November 22, 2011. Filed under: Agriculture, American History, Babies, Banking, Blogroll, Books, Business, College, Communications, Culture, Demographics, Diasters, Economics, Education, Employment, Energy, Enivornment, Entertainment, Farming, Federal Government, Fiscal Policy, Food, Foreign Policy, government, Health Care, history, Macroeconomics, Microeconomics, Monetary Policy, Money, Natural Gas, Nuclear Power, Oil, Wealth, Wisdom | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |

“…Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence (I conjure you to believe me, fellow-citizens) the jealousy of a free people ought to be constantly awake, since history and experience prove that foreign influence is one of the most baneful foes of republican government. But that jealousy, to be useful, must be impartial, else it becomes the instrument of the very influence to be avoided, instead of a defense against it. Excessive partiality for one foreign nation and excessive dislike of another cause those whom they actuate to see danger only on one side, and serve to veil and even second the arts of influence on the other. Real patriots who may resist the intrigues of the favorite are liable to become suspected and odious, while its tools and dupes usurp the applause and confidence of the people to surrender their interests.

The great rule of conduct for us in regard to foreign nations is, in extending our commercial relations to have with them as little political connection as possible. So far as we have already formed engagements let them be fulfilled with perfect good faith. Here let us stop. …”

“…It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world, so far, I mean, as we are now at liberty to do it, for let me not be understood as capable of patronizing infidelity to existing engagements. I hold the maxim no less applicable to public than to private affairs that honesty is always the best policy. I repeat, therefore, let those engagements be observed in their genuine sense. But in my opinion it is unnecessary and would be unwise to extend them.

Taking care always to keep ourselves by suitable establishments on a respectable defensive posture, we may safely trust to temporary alliances for extraordinary emergencies. …”

~President George Washington

Farewell Address, 1796

http://usinfo.org/docs/democracy/49.htm

Below is Glenn Beck’s hit piece on Ron Paul’s non-interventionist foreign policy.

You See … Even Glenn Beck thinks Ron Paul is an American Taliban Congressmen

Apparently, Beck skipped over Washington’s warning and advice about “the insidious wiles of foreign influences” and “to steer clear of permanent alliance.”

Beck would be well advised to heed Washington’s advice.

Instead he has become a shill for Israel, the  Israel lobby and the neoconservatives.

Beck has said in the past that he was a libertarian.

Do not be fooled, he is a pro-Israel big government neoconservative.

Ron Paul on Glenn Beck 6-27-11

Ron Paul This Speech Gave Me Chills

Ron Paul U S foreign Policy AIPAC Israel greatest obstacle no respect for the constitution

Is Ron Paul Really An Anti-Semite or the only one with the balls to tell us the truth!?

SA@TAC – Why Foreign Policy Matters Most 

The Truth About Terror | by The Southern Avenger

SA@TAC – Is Glenn Beck Killing the Tea Party?

SA@TAC – Ron Paul’s Conservative Foreign Policy

SA@TAC – The Great Neo-Con: Libertarianism Isn’t ‘Conservative’

The Lunacy of Norman Podhoretz by the Southern Avenger

Suggest Beck and his followers read George Nash’s book, The Conservative Intellectual Movement in America.

I always had some doubts about Glenn Beck and frankly never completely trusted him.

He is not a libertarian when it comes to foreign policy, but a closet neoconservative, that pops out of the closet to relieve himself, usually on the champion of the U.S. Constitution, Ron Paul.

Beck is no friend to principled conservative and libertarian, Ron Paul.

Beck, like Romney’s father, has been “brainwashed” about what needs to be done in the Middle East.

George Romney Brainwashing 1968 ElectionWallDotOrg

How to Brainwash a Nation

Romney, Gingrich and Paul on A Nuclear Iran – CBS News & National Journal GOP Debate

The only way Iran will not have a nuclear weapon is if Israel and the United States start a undeclared war with Iran and start World War III in the Middle East.

All Ron Paul is saying is follow the Constitution; go to Congress, make you case and if war is declared, win it.

Neither the progressives nor the neoconservatives want to do this for the simple reason the American people might say, “Are you nuts?”

Israel will most likely have to go it alone in attacking Iran.

The National Review has been captured by the neoconservatives and who did they put on their cover, Mitt Romney for president.

Ron Paul wants a  non-interventionist government policy both at home and abroad, as do I.

Beck actually agrees with Paul when he says that we should get out of the region, as do I.

Beck’s problem is he went to Israel and was given the “treatment” or “brainwashing” by the Government of Israel as have several other talk radio show host including Rush Limbaugh among several others.

The Communists used to do this with their carefully selected “useful” idiots.

I actually agree with Beck and Israel about the threat in the Middle East and Iran from radical Islam.

Iran has been at war with the United States using proxies for over thirty years.

Where we disagree is what to do about it.

Starting a world war by the United States attacking Iran is folly.

Ron Paul wants to bring the troops home from around the world,  dismantle the American empire of hundreds of military bases abroad and stop the U.S. government from empire or nation building and policing the world.

Let the people in these countries fight their own battles–Arabs against Iranians, Sunni against the Shia, Turkey against Syria and Iran, tribe against tribe, family against family.

America needs to simply mind its own business.

This is exactly what Washington and Paul are saying.

The majority of the American people are concluding after tens of thousands of American deaths and wounded and several trillions of dollars spent on undeclared wars that is would be far cheaper to bring the troops home and obtain our energy domestically.

Both the Democratic and Republican Party establishments and leaderships are deeply penetrated by both progressives and neoconservatives that want big government and a welfare and warfare economy that promotes collectivism and dependency on the government.

The progressive and neoconservatives are afraid of Ron Paul for the simple reason he might very well get elected President.

Question: Who is against Ron Paul?

Answer: Large U.S. banks, the military industrial complex, large U.S. corporation, unions, federal, state, and local governments and their bureaucracies, lawyers, accountants, lobbyists, many foreign governments who rely on U.S. for foreign aid, United Nations, progressives (including the  majority of the media and the academy) and neoconservatives including several radio talk show hosts and their regular guests (for example Bill Bennett and his neoconservative guests from the American Enterprise Institute).

Paul must be doing something right for he is scarring the hell out of both the Democratic and Republican establishment and their propagandist on the right, middle and center.

Reminds me of an old Barry Goldwater political ad:

Nikita Khrushchev Ad: Barry Goldwater 1964 Presidential Campaign Commercial

In your heart, you know Ron Paul is right.

I now consider Beck to be a “useful idiot” for the neoconservatives and the Israel lobby.

Beck at least in the past tired to connect the dots.

Beck’s weakness is he does not want to connect all the dots especially those that lead to advertisers such as large corporations.

It never occurs to Beck that if Ron Paul is so wise about the economy, why is he so wrong about foreign policy.

Here are three  very big clues for Beck:

Eisenhower warns us of the military industrial complex

Mind blowing speech by Robert Welch in 1958 predicting Insiders plans to destroy America

Ezra Taft Benson on The John Birch Society

“…This is an excerpt of an hour-long talk given in 1965 by Dwight D. Eisenhower’s Secretary of Agriculture, Ezra Taft Benson, just 4 years after having left the cabinet in Washington DC where he served the full 8 years (despite all predictions that he would be the first one in the cabinet to be removed given his severe anti-socialist policies). He sought to undo the bondage and destruction brought on by the New Deal as government now had moved far outside of it’s jurisdiction and constitutional bounds. Visit http://www.JBS.org for more information about The John Birch Society. …”

Government interventionism at home and abroad resulted in the welfare and warfare economy with massive government spending and dependency.

Beck is confusing the American people.

Sound familiar.

The American people and Ron Paul are going in same direction.

Beck manifestly  lies when he says that Ron Paul is going in the same direction as Romney and Gingrich.

Both Romney and Gingrich want bigger government not one that is limited in size and scope.

Both Romney and Gingrich want an interventionist foreign policy with America policing the world and nation building.

Both Romney and Gingrich wanted a mandated health insurance plan before they discovered that the American people do not.

Giveme a break.

The progressives, neoconservatives and the Israel lobby support either Romney or Gingrich not Ron Paul!

Ron Paul opposes foreign aid to all nations including Israel.

As a result many Jewish Americans conclude he must be an anti-Semite and anti-Israel.

No he is not. Paul is against foreign aid and for a non-interventionist foreign policy.

I cannot think of one talk radio show host that has served in the military, not a single one.

Beck did not wear the uniform of an American soldier, but now goes on his television show to point out he is wearing the lapel pin of the flag of Israel.

If Beck wants to support Israel may I suggest Beck  go to Israel and enlist in the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF).

Shame on Beck for his truly pathetic piece of propaganda and attack on Ron Paul.

Ron Paul is the only candidate running for President that is a veteran.

Dr. Paul served five years in the Air Force as a flight surgeon.

I trust Ron Paul and will vote for him.

I do not trust Obama, Romney, Gingrich, or Perry or their supporters in broadcasting.

Should Romney win the nomination, then the American people could be replacing an incompetent progressive with a competent one.

Voting for the lesser of two evils is still evil.

Instead of attacking Paul, Beck should examine his premises and logic and support him.

The progressive do not care whether Obama, Romney, Perry or even Gingrich are elected president.

Both the progressives and neoconservatives fear the election of Ron Paul.

Why?

Paul’s message is resonating with the American people because it is true and principled

Paul will win the Republican nomination.

However, should he not win the Republican nomination, I hope and pray he will form a new party.

Whether as a Republican or an independent, Paul will be our next president with a landslide victory over Obama.

The Ron Paul Story

SA@TAC – Conservatives’ Military-Industrial Complex

SA@TAC – The Return of the Real Right

A Tale of Two Rights | by The Southern Avenger

FOX News is No Better than the “Liberal Media” | by The Southern Avenger

“THESE are the times that try men’s souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands by it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman. Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph. What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly: it is dearness only that gives every thing its value. Heaven knows how to put a proper price upon its goods; and it would be strange indeed if so celestial an article as FREEDOM should not be highly rated….”

~Thomas Paine, The Crisis, December 23, 1776

Background Articles and Videos

Is  Ron Paul an Antisemite? No

by               Walter Block

http://lewrockwell.com/block/block183.html

The ‘Israel Lobby’ Controversy

Elite Factionalism or Elite Conspiracy Theory?

by Will Banyan

“…Speaking in Washington DC in August 2006 as guests of CAIR, Walt made the point that they never said “the Israel lobby was all powerful.” It was “not some secret cabal that controls [U.S.] foreign policy”; rather, there were “countervailing forces out there, though they are much weaker, and the lobby doesn’t get its way on every single issue.” Walt’s important caveats highlight something missing from both the leftist analysis, exemplified by Zunes, and the more traditional conspiratorial analysis, both of which seem to contend that the ruling elites are monolithic and unfractured.

     

Among conspiracists, particularly those concerned with the New World Order, the dominant assumption is that all groups are so interconnected that the same objective—world government—must predominate. Any evidence to the contrary is usually dismissed as a contrivance designed to deceive the public, or as a grubby squabble for control of the same project. David Icke, for instance, assures us that most world leaders (Illuminati) “only appear to be in conflict for the purposes of deluding the people into a false reality” (Icke 477).

     

Yet indisputable evidence of elite factionalism—of the upper echelons of the food-chain chasing different agendas than world government —has long been apparent. In his magnum opus, Tragedy and Hope (1966), for example, Carroll Quigley had observed how, since the 1950s, Wall Street had been challenged by the “new wealth springing up outside the eastern cities, notably in the Southwest and Far West.” As early as 1964, the representatives of this “new wealth,” based in oil, aviation or armaments, had engaged in a financial struggle with the “old wealth” of the East for control of the political process—and ultimately of the White House—to ensure that high government spending on military and space continued (Quigley 1245-1246). This split between the so-called East Coast “Yankees” and the “Cowboys” of the Southwest was subsequently explored at length by Kirkpatrick Sale (1975) and Carl Oglesby (1977).

     

Seen through the prism of elite factionalism, The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy is a valuable addition to this neglected field. It highlights in some detail the workings and influence of yet another private grouping that subverts democratic processes in service of a narrow agenda. Of course, some caution is necessary as the outcry over its activities is driven by elite, rather than popular, angst at losing the initiative. But to disregard it, either out of fears of being labeled as anti-Semitic or because it conflicts with other pet theories, would be shortsighted.

     

Whether the invasion of Iraq was for oil, Israel, or even world government (a contention doggedly advocated by the John Birch Society) will no doubt occupy the minds of various researchers for decades to come. But what should be clear is that in taking issue with the workings of various elite groups, we should not privilege one over the other as targets of our disdain, but recognize that the assault on democracy takes many forms and comes from many quarters and is always at the expense of the powerless.

Documentary on the John Birch Society

Related Posts On Pronk Palisades

Media Obama (MO), Neocons, Republican Establishment–Progressives All–Will Next Play The Race Card Against Ron Paul–Smear Campaign–Videos

Breaking News: Obama’s Opposition Research Digs Up Ron Paul’s Crimes–Constitution Champion, Cycling, Chocolate Chip Cookies, Children and Carol!–Photos and Videos

Yuri Bezmenov On KGB Soviet Propaganda and Subversion–Videos

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

CBS–Communists, Bolshevik, Socialists–Progressives All–Limited Ron Paul To 90 Seconds And Pulls Poll In Republican Presidential Debate On Foreign Policy–Warfare and Welfare Washington vs. Peace and Prosperity People–Videos

Posted on November 14, 2011. Filed under: Blogroll, Business, Communications, Demographics, Economics, Federal Government, Foreign Policy, government spending, Inflation, Investments, Language, Law, liberty, Life, Links, media, People, Philosophy, Politics, Public Sector, Rants, Raves, Resources, Security, Talk Radio, Taxes, Unemployment, Unions, Video, War, Wealth, Weapons, Wisdom | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |

Ron Paul CBS Debate Bias

Obama’s great white hope – Ron Paul

Professor Murray Sabrin admits Ron Paul is silenced by the media because of the Federal Reserve

Jerry Doyle: Exposes CBS Bias and the GOP Candidates Copying Paul’s Views (11-14-11)

CBS 90 Seconds Or Less

Ron Paul Gets 89 Seconds To Speak: Silenced by CBS

CNBC 600 Seconds or More

Ron Paul Responses At Debate (11-9-11)

Info News 2011-11-14 Monday Part 1/6

Ron Paul – CBSNews.com Post-Debate Poll plus General Poll – Results 11-14-11

Ron Paul 2012 Wins Again Nov 12th 2011 CBS Debate CORRUPT MEDIA (UPDATED)

Who won the GOP Debate? Take our poll

The GOP Post-Debate Poll

Paul Got Over 35 Percent of The Vote!

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57323832/who-won-the-gop-debate-take-our-poll/

Ron Paul “Super Brochures” On Sale @ RonPaulProducts

Ron Paul Gets 89 Seconds To Speak In CBS Debate

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
November 13, 2011

“…Congressman Ron Paul was a victim of what later transpired to be a deliberate policy on behalf of CBS News to restrict the air time of certain candidates during last night’s Republican debate, after he was afforded just 90 seconds of speaking time during the course of the event in South Carolina last night.

“…Obviously, that policy of limiting air time to certain candidates was also applied to Congressman Ron Paul, despite the fact that he has consistently won straw polls and proven himself as a top tier candidate in national polls.

As we have documented, despite his popularity the establishment media has deliberately downplayed and sidelined Paul’s campaign.

After Ron Paul finished a close second to Bachmann in the highly regarded Ames straw poll, and was subsequently blacklisted by the corporate press, Politico’s Roger Simon said the reason for him being ignored was that “the media doesn’t believe he has a hoot in hells chance of winning the Iowa caucuses, the Republican nomination or winning the presidency, so we’re gonna ignore him.”

“We are in the business of kicking candidates out of the race,” CNN host Howard Kurtz responded. …”

http://www.infowars.com/ron-paul-gets-89-seconds-to-speak-in-cbs-debate/

CBS on defensive after Republican debate

By Josh Lederman

“…”CBS’ coverage of the Republican Debate from Wofford College in Spartanburg was scheduled by the network to air for one hour on the CBS affiliates around the country with any overage to air Sunday morning on Face the Nation,” said Rob Romine, the station’s general manager. “We are sorry for the inconvenience this has caused and for any confusion Mr. Pelley’s comments have caused by telling South Carolina viewers to stay tuned for more debate coverage.”

The other major line of attack came from the candidates, many of whom complained during the debate that strict adherence to 60-second time limits and 30-second rebuttals prevented them from fully articulating any policy and kept many of the minor candidates in the shadows. Jon Huntsman joked that he felt like he was in Siberia; Rick Santorum concurred.

Ron Paul’s campaign was the first to cry foul after the debate, with his chairman, Jesse Benton, accusing CBS News of arrogance and of thinking they could choose the next president. Two hours later, Paul supporters received a message with the subject line “What a joke.”

“Ninety seconds. That’s how much of the first hour of tonight’s GOP debate was given to Ron Paul. 90 measly seconds out of 3,600 seconds,” wrote campaign manager John Tate.

But it was Michele Bachmann whose complaint came backed up by evidence that concerns about candidates’ being sidelined were raised even before the debate took place.

Just after the debate ended, Bachmann’s campaign accused CBS News of deliberately keeping her questions to a minimum and planning a biased debate, with campaign manager, Keith Nahigian, reportedly calling CBS’s newly anointed political director, John Dickerson, a “piece of s**t.” …”

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/gop-primaries/193263-cbs-on-defense-after-gop-debate

Background Articles and Videos

Ron Paul: Principle, Patriotism and Constitutional Government

This is a classic edition of Conservative Roundtable from 1997, the nationally broadcast conservative television program hosted by Howard Phillips, and produced by The Conservative Caucus. Producer: Art Harman.
Unlike “politicians,” statesman Ron Paul never lost his belief that government is the problem, not the answer; you’ll see here that his positions are as sound today as when this was recorded in 1997!

Alan Keyes discusses media bias with Bernard Goldberg

VOICES OF REASON – Bernard Goldberg

Scott Pelley


Pelley’s Liberal Path to the Anchor Chair

“…On Monday, June 6, 2011, Scott Pelley took over as anchor of the CBS Evening News, following the departure of Katie Couric. A review of the MRC’s archive reveals Pelley will most likely continue the long tradition of liberal bias advanced by his anchor predecessors Couric, Dan Rather and Walter Cronkite.

From celebrating the likes of liberal heroes like Hillary Clinton, saying that she is of the rare few that can match Barack Obama’s “global star power” to even offering praise of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, depicting him as a “genuinely humble” figure with “no fancy clothes, fancy cars” who was “absolutely incorruptible,” Pelley’s new stint as anchor promises to be one filled with biased platitudes for those on the left and harsh criticism of the right. Below are just a dozen examples of Pelley’s slanted take over the years as a CBS correspondent for the Evening News and 60 Minutes. …”

http://www.mrc.org/static/profiles/ScottPelley/NewEveningNewsAnchor.aspx

Bolshevik

“…The Bolsheviks, originally also[1] Bolshevists[2] (Russian: большевики, большевик (singular) Russian pronunciation: [bəlʲʂᵻˈvʲik], derived from bol’shinstvo, “majority”) were a faction of the Marxist Russian Social Democratic Labour Party (RSDLP) which split apart from the Menshevik faction[3] at the Second Party Congress in 1903. [4]

The Bolsheviks were the majority faction in a crucial vote, hence their name. They ultimately became the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.[5] The Bolsheviks came to power in Russia during the October Revolution phase of the Russian Revolution of 1917, and founded the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic which would later in 1922 become the chief constituent of the Soviet Union.

The Bolsheviks, founded by Vladimir Lenin, were by 1905 a mass organization consisting primarily of workers under a democratic internal hierarchy governed by the principle of democratic centralism, who considered themselves the leaders of the revolutionary working class of Russia. Their beliefs and practices were often referred to as Bolshevism. Bolshevik revolutionary leader Leon Trotsky commonly used the terms “Bolshevism” and “Bolshevist” after his exile from the Soviet Union to differentiate between what he saw as true Leninism and the regime within the state and the party which arose under Stalin. …”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bolshevik

Related Posts On Pronk Palisades

Republican Party Presidential/Commander In Chief Debate–November 12, 2011-Spartanburg, South Carolina–Foreign Policy and National Security–CBS–Videos

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

It’s Time–Bring The Troops Home–Ron Paul On Government Intervention Abroad–Nation Builing–Bankrupting The Country–Videos

Posted on May 2, 2011. Filed under: Blogroll, Communications, Foreign Policy, government, government spending, Law, liberty, Life, media, People, Philosophy, Politics, Raves, Strategy, Talk Radio, Taxes, Video, War | Tags: , , , , |

The Plain Truth on Wars of Intervention

 

Ron Paul: We Tried Last Week To Bring Our Troops Home From Afghanistan & Now We’re In Another War!

 
52% Want Troops Home from Afghanistan Within a Year
 
“…A majority of voters, for the first time, support an immediate withdrawal of all U.S. troops from Afghanistan or the creation of a timetable to bring them all home within a year.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 31% of Likely U.S. Voters now say all troops should be brought home from Afghanistan immediately, while another 21% say a firm timetable should be established to bring all troops home within a year’s time. The combined total of 52% who want the troops home within a year is a nine-point jump from 43% last September. Just 37% felt that way in September 2009.

Only 34% of voters now think there should be no timetable for withdrawal. Fifteen percent (15%) are not sure. …”

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/afghanistan/52_want_troops_home_from_afghanistan_within_a_year 

 

 

The George Bush You Forgot

 

Candidate George Bush Giving His Stump Speech: Election 2000

 

Ron Paul: Bin Laden mocks economy

 

Rep Ron Paul: We killed a million Iraqis and that pleased bin Laden

 

Nation Building (Ron Paul vs. George Bush and Dick Cheney)

 

Ron Paul Bring Our Troops Home (three years ago)

 

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

Liked it here?
Why not try sites on the blogroll...