Glenn Beck Out-of-The Closet Tea Party Libertarian–When Will Glenn Tell Us He Has Joined Dallas Chapter of The John Birch Society? — Videos

Posted on February 24, 2013. Filed under: American History, Banking, Blogroll, Business, College, Communications, Cult, Culture, Economics, Education, Federal Government, Federal Government Budget, Fiscal Policy, Food, government, government spending, Health Care, history, Investments, liberty, Life, Links, Macroeconomics, media, Medicine, Microeconomics, Monetary Policy, Money, People, Philosophy, Politics, Psychology, Raves, Religion, Tax Policy, Video, War, Wealth | Tags: Alex Jones, Bilderberg Group, Collectivism, Council of Foreign Relations, Economics, Glenn Beck, Individualism, Invisible Empire, John McManus, libertarian, New World Order, Politics, Robert Welch, The John Birch Society, Trilateral Commission |

Glenn Beck Apologizes to Libertarians, Begs them to Welcome New People into

Mind blowing speech by Robert Welch in 1958 predicting Insiders plans to destroy

What Is the John Birch Society?

History Lesson: Eisenhower Agriculture Sect. Sounds the Alarm Over Take Over of America 1 of 2

History Lesson: Eisenhower Agriculture Sect. Sounds the Alarm Over Take Over of America 2 of 2

Karl Rove vs. The Tea Party: Conservative Civil War

The John Birch Society

John Birch Society documentary from the 1960′s

G. Edward Griffin – The Collectivist Conspiracy

G. Edward Griffin The Dangerous Servant A Discourse on Government

G. Edward Griffin in Toronto (November 16th 2012)

The Creature From Jekyll Island (by G. Edward Griffin)

G. Edward Griffin on Glenn Beck

“The Federal Reserve Is a Cartel” – G. Edward Griffin

Betrayal of the Constitution An Exposé of the Neoconservative Agenda.flv

JBS (John Birch Society) Overview of America Part 1 (HQ)

Alex Jones welcomes John Birch Society President John McManus 1/5

Alex Jones welcomes John Birch Society President John McManus 2/5

Alex Jones welcomes John Birch Society President John McManus 3/5

Alex Jones welcomes John Birch Society President John McManus 4/5

Alex Jones welcomes John Birch Society President John McManus 5/5

Invisible Empire A New World Order Defined Full (Order it at Infowars.com)

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

United Nations and International Telecommunications Union (ITU) Plans To Takeover The Internet at World Conference on International Telecommunications (WCIT)? or Google FUD?–Videos

Posted on December 2, 2012. Filed under: Blogroll, Business, College, Communications, Computers, Culture, Economics, Education, Entertainment, Federal Government, Fiscal Policy, Foreign Policy, Games, government spending, Language, Law, liberty, Life, Links, media, Movies, People, Philosophy, Politics, Regulations, Taxes, Technology, Video, Wealth, Wisdom | Tags: Anonymous, Big Brother, Big Government, Fear, freedom, FUD, Google, Government Control of Internet, International Telecommunication Union, Internet, ITU, Julian Assange, Keep The Internet Free, liberty, New World Order, NWO, Propaganda, UN, Uncertainty and Doubt, United Nations, WCIT, Wikileaks, World Conference on International Telecommunications |

Anonymous WORLD ANONYMOUS NOW

Greetings citizens of the world, the following is a very special message for all of humanity. Too long have we lived in fear, fear of greed, fear of corruption, fear of failure, fear that everything we’ve known turned out to be wrong.

No longer will we live in fear! It ends here and now, with you and me! We are brothers and sisters of humanity, the time has come for us to unite! We must forge a new beginning of peace and love, we must be the good we want to see in the world.

Humanity is still young, and for the first time ever in human history we have a real chance at true peace as a species. The internet has united us more than ever before, its time we use this gift to promote the unity of us all. Its time we stand up as a planet and declare we will no longer take part in a system based on fear, greed, corruption, and war.

Lets put everything into perspective for those of you that need more convincing, the United Sates alone has spent trillions of dollars on wars. War has claimed the lives of over 264 million people throughout the course of known human history, many of whom where civilians. Human progress has been halted by senseless wars.

While we fight amongst ourselves on Earth there’s an entire universe passing us by. There are an estimated 160 billion planets in our galaxy alone, many of which could potentially be home to carbon-based life as we know it. Stars go supernova, entire solar systems get destroyed, even whole galaxies collide while we argue and fight over small and pointless issues. We should be happy we have a planet to live on, not fighting over who owns the planet. In truth no individual or even an entire species owns it, because in truth all life on Earth owns this planet.

Someday soon humanity will venture to the stars, will we go into the unknown divided and fighting? Or will we say as one voice, as one species, “We the People of Earth, united as one, declare from this day fourth that no force, however big or small, shall ever divide the spirit of humanity again. United in our cause for peace, knowledge, and progress, we go forward into the unknown as brothers and sisters, as a species no longer divided by war, greed, corruption, and fear.”

The choice is yours to make, you are Anonymous, you are the future of Earth. You can either continue the wars and division of humanity, or you can try something new. You can give peace a chance, you can help secure a beautiful world of peace, knowledge, and progress for all generations to come.

You are Anonymous,
You are part of Humanity,
You should Forgive,
yet You should never Forget,
It’s time to Expect Yourself…Lets unite under WORLD ANONYMOUS NOW.

With your help, may one day the innocent never suffer and the brave never die, for on that day we’ll truly be free. United as one, divided by zero.

anonymous ITU and WCIT 3-15 december

New Trend: Governing the Internet

TAKE ACTION for a FREE and OPEN INTERNET, Threat Wire Ep. 002

This week on Threat Wire, Darren and Shannon discuss the issues with the ITU and keeping the internet free and open for the world.

For a list of stories and links visit: http://hak5.org/threatwire/0002

U.S. Resists U.N.-controlled Internet

The UN have apparently released details that they will to add certain levels of control on the internet, which would for one thing cause traffic from abroad to larger international websites based in the US (such as facebook or Google) to have to pay a tax,.

“”Proposals for the new ITU treaty run to more than 200 pages. One idea is to apply the ITU’s long-distance telephone rules to the Internet by creating a ‘sender-party-pays’ rule. International phone calls include a fee from the originating country to the local phone company at the receiving end. Under a sender-pays approach, U.S.-based websites would pay a local network for each visitor from overseas, effectively taxing firms such as Google and Facebook. “

ALERT – United Nations To Seize Control Of Internet ?!?

The U.N. Threat To Internet Freedom
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204792404577229074023195322.html

United Nation Planning to Control The Internet – Alex Jones Tv

United Nations Seeks to Control the Internet – Thoughts & Opinions

Does the ITU threaten freedom of speech on the Internet? – Truthloader

Assange s prophecy Govnts plan Internet takeover

Richard Hill at the EIF debate on WCIT and ITRs

The 193 member countries of the ITU will meet in Dubai 3-14 December at World Conference on International Telecommunication 2012 to revise the International Telecommunication Regulations (ITRs), a 1988 treaty-level document establishing policies governing international telecommunications services between countries. While some Member States of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), as well as a few independent groups, are advocating for expanded intergovernmental powers over the Internet with respect to the Internet as well as wireless, IP-based, and next generation networks; other countries believe that the WCIT should adopt only minor changes to the ITRs as necessary to modernize the existing provisions of the treaty, and that new provisions and authorities are unnecessary.

Europe’s role and view will be crucial in the debate and to its outcome. In the dinner debate organised by the European Internet Foundation, representatives from the European Commission, European Industry and Civil society had been invited to exchange views on issues at stake and present their positions.

Perspectives from the International Telecommunications Union (ITU) were presented by Richard Hill, Counsellor at the ITU

Vint Cerf on the ITU

Vint Cerf, Google’s Chief Internet Evangelist, shares a message with participants at the Big Tent Dublin on the importance of free expression. Vint also expresses his concerns about potential threats to an Open Internet in Internet governance reform at the International Telecommunications Union (ITU) conference in Dubai in December 2012.

YOUR INTERNET IS IN DANGER!!!

Your internet is fine. I lied. But Google lied first, so I think it’s justified.

Links!
Google’s “Take Action”: https://www.google.com/intl/en/takeaction/
The International Telecommunications Union: http://www.itu.int/

International Telecommunication Regulations (doc): http://www.itu.int/ITU-T/itr/files/ITR-e.doc
Document leaks: http://wcitleaks.org/

Alex Jones Exposes Google’s Plan to Dominate the Internet

Goodlatte speaks in opposition to UN control of the Internet

ITU TELECOM WORLD 2012 – Highlights Video

Highlights video of ITU TELECOM WORLD 2012, Dubai, UAE.

ITU Telecom World 2012, 14-18 October 2012, Dubai International Convention and Exhibition Centre (DICEC).

Five days of pivotal discussion and debate on some of the hottest topics facing the ICT industry.

The world is changing faster than ever before in human history, thanks largely to the explosive growth of the ICT sector. New technologies, new industry players and new global trends is at the heart of debates in Dubai.

Hundreds of industry leaders came together with government ministers, regulators and manufacturers for five days of critical debate to shape the policies, regulations and competitive strategies of future communications.

ITU INTERVIEW @ WCIT-12: Paul Budde, Independent Analyst, BuddeComm

Interview with Paul Budde, Independent Analyst, BuddeComm at WCIT 2012
Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 3-14 December 2012.

The World Conference on International Telecommunications will review the current International Telecommunications Regulations (ITRs), which serve as the binding global treaty designed to facilitate international interconnection and interoperability of information and communication services, as well as ensuring their efficiency and widespread public usefulness and availability.

ITU Secretary – General Video Message: Dr Hamadoun I.Touré, S-G, ITU on WCIT – 12

ITU Secretary General Video Message: Dr Hamadoun I.Touré, Secretary-General, International Telecommunications Union, speaking about the World Conference on International Telecommunications 2012(WCIT -12).

ITU will convene the World Conference on International Telecommunications (WCIT) in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, from 3-14 December 2012. This landmark conference will review the current International Telecommunication Regulations (ITRs), which serve as the binding global treaty designed to facilitate international interconnection and interoperability of information and communication services, as well as ensuring their efficiency and widespread public usefulness and availability.

FRANCE 24 Tech 24: Who rules the Web? : ITU vs. ICANN

Internet at Liberty 2012: Plenary II - Riz Khan, Gary Fowlie, Ben Wagner

Possible Internet Take Over By The ITU (UN) [HD]

Spread the word, share & take action! :

*Sign-on Letter Opposing ITU Authority Over the Internet :

{https://www.cdt.org/letter/sign-letter-opposing-itu-authority-over-internet}

*ITU Advocacy Tools:

[Internet advocates all over the world are organizing around the upcoming ITU conference. On this page, we've collected a set of tools and resources to help interested groups and citizens get involved.]

{https://www.cdt.org/content/itu-tools-advocates}

*ITU Commentary by Global Experts:

{https://www.cdt.org/content/itu-commentary-global-experts}

*CDT Analyses of Key ITU Proposals:

{https://www.cdt.org/content/cdt-analyses-key-itu-proposals}

*ONLINE PETITION: Protect Global Internet Freedom (Organizations:924 – Countries Represented: 161) :

{http://www.protectinternetfreedom.net/}

Internet should stay free and open

Ivailo Kalfin (MEP, BG) argues in the European parliament that Internet should stay free and open, ahead of the WCIT meeting in Dubai in December. Internet is a very strong tool these days and there are many that would like to control it and the people, using it. For example by changing its business model and making it more expensive and less accessible. Some governments are even suggesting creating a “national internet”, which is an oxymoron, something that is against the nature of Internet itself, says Kalfin

Operation WCIT – Keep OUR internet Free

We love the internet.
And we’re guessing you do too. Think about all the awesome things it gives us: A vast communication network; innovative businesses; a platform to freely speak or challenge powerful governments; and hundreds and hundreds of hours of cat videos.

All this great stuff is available because the internet was designed in an open and inclusive way, with a multitude of voices being able to get a say on how it’s governed.
But the internet is in danger.

There’s a meeting between the world’s governments in a just a few weeks, and it could very well decide the future of the internet through a binding international treaty. It’s called the World Conference on International Telecommunications (WCIT), and it’s being organized by a government-controlled UN agency called the International Telecommunication Union (ITU).

If some proposals at WCIT are approved, decisions about the internet would be made by a top-down, old-school government-centric agency behind closed doors. Some proposals allow for internet access to be cut off more easily, threaten privacy, legitimizes monitoring and blocking of online traffic. Others seek to impose new fees for accessing content, not to mention slowing down connection speeds. Used as a pretext to internet pornography among other things as an excuse to censor sensitive material pages (note that there are too many cases of child pornography that are ignored by the police) In addition to paying for internet service, you’d also have to pay for visiting certain sites, such as YouTube. Your communications would be constantly monitored and archived, meaning the end of Internet privacy. This could potentially lead to individuals becoming victims of blackmail by malicious people who control the monitoring. The Internet is home to many organized social movements which fight for human rights worldwide. If we allow this, we will not be able to use the Internet to organize the defense of our rights…

If the delicate balance of the internet is upset, it could have grave consequences for businesses and human rights.
This must be stopped.

Only governments get a vote at WCIT, so we need people from all around the world to demand that our leaders keep the internet open.
Watch the video, and take action above to tell your governments to oppose handing over key decisions about the internet to the ITU. Let’s use the internet’s global reach to save it.

Watch the video here https://www.whatistheitu.org/?ref=an

Leaked documents here http://www.wcitleaks.org/

WebChat: http://webchat.voxanon.org/?channels=opwcit

We are the internet
We are anonymous
We are here to help you with your revolution

Background Articles and Videos

World Conference on International Telecommunications (WCIT-12)

“…ITU will convene the World Conference on International Telecommunications (WCIT) in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, from 3-14 December 2012. This landmark conference will review the current International Telecommunications Regulations (ITRs), which serve as the binding global treaty designed to facilitate international interconnection and interoperability of information and communication services, as well as ensuring their efficiency and widespread public usefulness and availability.

The treaty sets out general principles for assuring the free flow of information around the world, promoting affordable and equitable access for all and laying the foundation for ongoing innovation and market growth. The ITRs were last negotiated in Melbourne, Australia in 1988, and there is broad consensus that the text now needs to be updated to reflect the dramatically different information and communication technology (ICT) landscape of the 21st century.

The conference will consider a review (see PP-06 Resolution 146) of the International Telecommunication Regulations (ITRs), which define the general principles for the provision and operation of international telecommunications. …”

http://www.itu.int/en/wcit-12/Pages/overview.aspx

HISTORY OF ITU: “The International Telecommunication Union” – 1966 United Nations Film (Part 1)

HISTORY OF ITU: “The International Telecommunication Union” – 1966 United Nations Film (Part 2)

Background Articles and Videos

The Creature From Jekyll Island (by G. Edward Griffin)

Rare year 1982 video with G. Edward Griffin & Norman Dodds#1

Rare year 1982 video with G. Edward Griffin & Norman Dodds#2

Rare year 1982 video with G. Edward Griffin & Norman Dodds#3

Rare year 1982 video with G. Edward Griffin & Norman Dodds#4

Rare year 1982 video with G. Edward Griffin & Norman Dodds#5

Rare year 1982 video with G. Edward Griffin & Norman Dodds#6

Rare Carroll Quigley interview – 1974 (Full Interview)

G. Edward Griffin on ‘Glen Beck’ Exposes Criminal Nature and Total Secrecy of Federal Reserve System

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

Who is Jeffrey Lord? Why Is He Attacking Ron Paul on Talk Radio Shows Including: Levin, Medved and Bennett? Big Government Interventionist Neoconservative Republican Establishment Hit Man!

Posted on December 30, 2011. Filed under: American History, Blogroll, College, Communications, Economics, Education, Federal Government, Fiscal Policy, Foreign Policy, government, government spending, history, Investments, Language, Law, liberty, Life, Links, media, People, Philosophy, Politics, Rants, Raves, Regulations, Security, Talk Radio, Taxes, War, Wealth, Wisdom | Tags: Bennett, Big Government, Bill Bennett, Collectivists, Conservative Movement, Democratic Party, Faith Family Friends Freedom First, freedom, George Nash, Hugh Hewett, Individualist, Interventionist, Israel, Israeli Lobby, Jack Hunter, Jeffrey Lord, Libertarians, liberty, Limited Government, Ludwig von Mises, Mark Levin, Medved, Michael Medved, neocons, Neoconservatives, New World Order, Omnipotent Government, Peace and Prosperity, Progresssives, Republican Party, Ron Paul, Southern Avenger, Statism, Tom Woods, Warfare and Welfare |

The 1% Are Afraid of Ron Paul 2012 Revolt -

NWO Corporate Minions (MSM Whores) Getting Desperate!

How Ron Paul Would Defend America

Mark Levin and Jeffrey Lord Precious Delicate Utopian Neocons

Mark Levin Interviews Jeffrey Lord On Ron Paul And His Supporters Being Neoliberal

Michael Medved, Jeffery Lord On Ron Paul’s Neoliberal Reeducation

Mark Levin, Ron Paul Hater, Put in His Place

American Spectator Dead Wrong on Ron Paul

SA@TheDC – “I Like Ron Paul Except on Foreign Policy”

SA@The DC – Ron Paul’s Reaganesque Foreign Policy

SA@TAC – A Conservative Foreign Policy Comeback?

SA@TheDC – Conservatism for What?

SA@TAC – Ron Paul’s Pledge to America

Jack Hunter on FOX News 12-29-11

Establishment Media Crucifies Ron Paul On Every Front

“As long as nations cling to protective tariffs, migration barriers, compulsory education, interventionism and etatism, new conflicts capable of breaking out at any time into open warfare will continually arise to plague mankind.”

~Ludwig von Mises, Liberalism, pages 150-151

Jeffrey Lord has been attacking Ron Paul’s non-interventionist foreign policy on various so-called “conservative” talk radio shows and accuses Ron Paul of not being a conservative.

Really, he must be kidding or simply does not know the history of the conservative movement.

Suggest he read George H. Nash’s book, The Conservative Intellectual Movement in America Since 1945.

SA@TAC – The Great Neo-Con: Libertarianism Isn’t ‘Conservative’

If Lord means that Ron Paul is not a neoconservative, then Lord is correct.

Ron Paul is definitely not a neoconservative.

Congressman Ron Paul, MD – We’ve Been NeoConned

Neoconservatives are right-wing progressives Democrats that became “boat people” and switched to the Republican Party in the 1970s when the Democratic Party nominated George McGovern as their Presidential candidate.

SA@TAC – What’s a ‘Neoconservative?’

SA@TAC – Who’s a Republican?

SA@TAC – Is Ron Paul Weird?

Most conservatives and libertarians do not consider neoconservatives as either new or conservative. They are really progressives that want the United States to have an aggressive interventionist foreign policy that supports nation or empire building, the U.S. as policeman of the world and Israel with foreign aid.

Both the progressives and/or neoconservatives that are in the Republican Party establishment are in panic mode that Paul may win the presidential nomination.

I suggest neoconservative Republicans get back in their boats and go back to the Democratic Party, where most of them came from in the first place.

Please take your hitman, Jeffrey Lord, with you.

Big government interventionists pervade the Democratic and Republican party establishments and leaderships.

The Democratic Party is the party of left-wing progressives that favor the expansion of welfare dependency.

The Republican Party is the party of right-wing progressives that favor the expansion of warfare dependency.

Both favor big government interventionism at home and abroad.

Making government omnipotent with a massive bureaucracy advocating and supporting the warfare and welfare state is the goal of the progressive interventionists of the Democratic and Republican Party establishments.

SA@TheDC – ‘Fixing’ Big Government is Not Conservative

Ron Paul favors limited government and opposes government intervention at home and abroad.

Ron Paul is a conservative traditionalist libertarian that puts faith, family, friends and freedom first.

Paul wants to replace the big government warfare and welfare economy with a limited government peace and prosperity economy.

This is the reason more and more American people are coming to the conclusion that Ron Paul should be President of the United States.

SA@TAC – Constant Conservative Ron Paul

This is the reason Ron Paul is leading in Iowa.

This is the reason Ron Paul will be elected President of the United States.

The Republican Party establishment might talk conservative, but they walk and spend like big government progressives and neocons, which most of them are.

Just look at the Republican Party budget passed in the House of Representatives. The Fiscal Year 2012 deficit will exceed $1 trillion each year.

This is not limited government.

This is not fiscally responsible.

This is not conservative or libertarian.

The neoconservatives want a war with Iran.

Starting World War III with Iran is the progressive answer to the United States economic problems.

The war on poverty, the war of drugs and the war on terror are all progressive wars of big government interventionists.

The U.S. government led by progressives of both the Democratic and Republican party establishments have lost all three wars that never end.

Those who support big government interventionism at home and abroad are progressive statistist and neoconservatives.

Progressives are collectivists that oppose individualists with a conservative and libertarian political philosophy.

These progressives are not conservatives.

Do not fall for the neoconservative con men of talk radio that say Ron Paul is not conservative and invite Jeffrey Lord on their shows to smear and discredit Paul.

Most of them are closet neoconservative big government interventionists. This includes talk radio show hosts Levin, Medved, Hewitt and Bennett, just to name a few.

Ron Paul: Iran Sanctions = Act of War

“Interventionism begets economic nationalism. It thus kindles the antagonism resulting in war. An abandonment of economic nationalism is not feasible if nations cling to interference with business. Free trade in international relations requires domestic free trade.”

~Ludwig von Mises, Omnipotent Government, page 66.

SA@TAC – The End of Right-Wing Progressivism?

This is a massively huge and interventionist government that favors the warfare and welfare dependency of the American people.

Gingrich Gone Wild – Might Vote For Obama

SA@TAC – Newt Gingrich is Not a Conservative

Ron Paul Interview w/ Jack Hunter on Foreign Policy & Israel

Jeffrey Lord Doesn’t Know The Founders or Ron Paul

Background Articles and Videos

Ron Paul – The Power of Nightmares

Mark Levin Avoids the “Empire” Question

SA@TAC – Joe Sobran’s Conservative Foreign Policy

SA@TAC – Obama Kept Us Safe

Poo Blobs & Jeffrey Lord Try to Say that DropDobbs.com is About Killing Debate, NOT Racist Diatribe

RON PAUL on RUSH LIMBAUGH

Jack Hunter Versus Mark Levin

Richard Perle PNAC and AIPAC hawk on why Ron Paul will not win the 2012 election

Ron Paul and the Neoliberal Reeducation Campaign

By Jeffrey Lord

“…Neoliberals and Quasi-Cons:

When it comes to foreign policy, Ron Paul and his supporters are not conservatives.

This is important to understand when one realizes that Paul’s views are, self-described, “non-interventionist.”

The fact that he has been allowed to get away with pretending to conservatism on this score is merely reflective of journalists who, for whatever reason, are simply unfamiliar with American history. Ironically, it is precisely because the Paul campaign has not been thoroughly covered that no one pays attention to the historical paternity of what the candidate is saying.

There is no great sin in Paul’s non-interventionist stance (or “isolationist” stance as his critics would have it). There have been American politicians aplenty throughout American history, particularly in the 20th century, who believed precisely as Paul and his enthusiasts do right now. (Paul touts his admiration for the Founding Fathers, but even that is very selective. James Monroe of Monroe Doctrine fame was a considerable interventionist, Washington as a general invaded Canada, and Alexander Hamilton gave rise to Paul’s idea of evil spawn — the Federal Reserve. Interventionists of all types have been with us right from the start.)

The deception — and it is a considerable deception — is that almost to a person those prominent pre-Ron Paul non-interventionist “Paulist” politicians of the 20th century were overwhelmingly not conservatives at all. They were men of the left. The far left.

From three-time Democratic presidential nominee and Woodrow Wilson Secretary of State William Jennings Bryan to powerful Montana Democratic Senator Burton K. Wheeler to FDR’s ex-vice presidential nominee Henry Wallace to the 1968 anti-war presidential candidacy of Minnesota Democratic Senator Eugene McCarthy to 1972 Democratic presidential nominee (and Henry Wallace delegate in 1948) George McGovern, non-interventionists have held prominent positions in the American Left that was and is the Democratic Party.

But of particular interest, and here is where the deception by Paulists is so considerable, the Ron Paul view of foreign policy has been the cornerstone of Republican liberals and progressives. Those who, using current political terminology, would be called the RINOs (Republican In Name Only) of their day. …”

http://spectator.org/archives/2011/08/23/ron-paul-and-the-neoliberal-re/1

“…Jeffrey Lord is a former member of the Ronald Reagan administration, journalist, author, and political strategist in Pennsylvania.

Lord earned a degree from Franklin and Marshall College.^[1] He first worked as a press aide in the Pennsylvania State Senate.^[1] He worked for Pennsylvania Congressman Bud Shuster as Legislative Director and Press Secretary and for U.S. Senator H. John Heinz III as Executive Assistant.^[1] Later Lord worked as Chief of Staff to Drew Lewis, who was a Co-chair of the Ronald Reagan presidential campaign.^[1] He also served in the Reagan White House as an associate political director.^[1] In that position he assisted in the judicial nomination process for several nominees, including Robert Bork.^[2] He also worked for Jack Kemp during the Presidency of George H. W. Bush.^[1]

Lord now works as a journalist, contributing material to The Weekly Standard, The American Spectator, National Review Online, the Wall Street Journal, the Washington Times, the Los Angeles Times, the Philadelphia Inquirer, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, and the Harrisburg Patriot-News. He has appeared as a guest on numerous televisions and radio programs.^[1] He also works as a political consultant for Quantum Communications, a Harrisburg-based political strategy firm.^[1]

He is the author of The Borking Rebellion, about the confirmation of Federal Judge D. Brooks Smith.^[1] It received a generally positive review in the Wall Street Journal.^[3]

In July 2010, Jeffrey Lord claimed that the “lynching” of a relative of Shirley Sherrod is fallacious.^[4]

In August 2011, Jeffrey Lord wrote an article in The American Spectator which was critical of Congressman Ron Paul (R-TX), and the views of some of Ron Paul’s supporters.^[5] It sparked considerable debate within the conservative movement.^[6] …”

Jeffrey Lord: When Attacks on Ron Paul Fail, then Attack his Voters

“…

Get this. The reason Ron Paul is polling well in Iowa is because it’s Iowa. Jeffrey Lord is a special kind of dense. He is so dense he doesn’t know he is dense. He keeps repeating the same untruths (that non-interventionism is inherently left-wing) over and over again despite being corrected repeatedly. My reply is below:

I get it. When your attacks on Ron Paul aren’t working, then attack the people who vote for him.

First, you continue with the lie that non-interventionism is inherently left-wing. You have been corrected on this so many times, and I know you read these responses since you reply, that you have no excuse. You are engaging in demagoguery.

Second, you are making the case against yourself and don’t even know it. It is not a coincidence that non-interventionism was the preferred policy of heartland Americans in flyover country. And it is not a coincidence that support for war came from elite internationalists on the East Coast. So if you want to throw your hat in with elitist internationalists then be my guest. I’ll throw mine in with parochial Americans in the Heartland. Lord, you are a shill and you don’t even realize you are a shill. …”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T57yvB4RDHs

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

The John Birch Society-Overview of America-Videos

Posted on September 3, 2011. Filed under: Agriculture, American History, Babies, Blogroll, Business, College, Communications, Economics, Education, Employment, European History, Farming, Federal Government, Films, Fiscal Policy, Foreign Policy, government, government spending, history, Homes, Immigration, Inflation, Investments, Language, Law, liberty, Life, Links, media, Microeconomics, Monetary Policy, Music, People, Philosophy, Politics, Raves, Talk Radio, Unemployment, Unions, Video, War, Wealth, Wisdom | Tags: America, Congress, conservatives, elites, free enterprise, Free Markets, government, House of Representatives, John Birch Society, John McManus, Libertarians, New World Order, Overview of America, Politics, The U.S. Constitution, Videos |

John Birch Society – Overview of America – Part 1

John Birch Society – Overview of America – Part 2

John Birch Society – Overview of America – Part 3

John Birch Society – Overview of America – Part 4

Background Articles and Videos

Alex Jones welcomes John Birch Society President John McManus 1/5

Alex Jones welcomes John Birch Society President John McManus 2/5

Alex Jones welcomes John Birch Society President John McManus 3/5

Alex Jones welcomes John Birch Society President John McManus 4/5

Alex Jones welcomes John Birch Society President John McManus 5/5

Background Articles and Videos

TRUTH BE TOLLED (TTC) PART 1 OF 12

TRUTH BE TOLLED (TTC) PART 2 OF 12

TRUTH BE TOLLED (TTC) PART 3 OF 12

TRUTH BE TOLLED (TTC) PART 4 OF 12

TRUTH BE TOLLED (TTC) PART 5 OF 12

TRUTH BE TOLLED (TTC) PART 6 OF 12

TRUTH BE TOLLED (TTC) PART 7 OF 12

TRUTH BE TOLLED (TTC) PART 8 OF 12

TRUTH BE TOLLED (TTC) PART 9 OF 12

TRUTH BE TOLLED (TTC) PART 10 OF 12

TRUTH BE TOLLED (TTC) PART 11 OF 12

TRUTH BE TOLLED (TTC) PART 12 OF 12

Background Articles and Videos

Do you want a One World Govenment / One World Caliphate ?

WORLD WAR 3 WILL BE A GOG MAGOG WAR

RED ALERT: WORLD WAR 3 IMMINENT

HD) Muslim Caliph PT. 15 – World War 3

(HD) Muslim Caliph PT. 16 – Coming of Imam Mahdi

(HD) Muslim Caliph PT. 17 – Islamic Prophecies and 2012

HD) Muslim Caliph PT. 18 – Isa (Jesus) Restores Islam

Ezekiel 39 – The Gog Magog War

King (Gog) and country (Magog, ruled by Gog) mentioned in Ezekiel 38-39. Gog, it was believed, would lead an alliance of the forces of evil in an invasion of Israel after the latter’s restoration to its land. The subsequent defeat of Gog and the survival of Israel would lead to the recognition by all peoples that Israel’s previous suffering was the result not of God’s having abandoned Israel but of His punishing Israel for its transgressions. The terminology of these chapters of Ezekiel, as well as the supernatural, disastrous punishment to be visited on the invaders, mark this prophecy as apocalyptic. Further, the prolixity of these two chapters as well as their inconsistency in detail is highly characteristic of apocalyptic writings.Opinion is divided as to what historical figure or episode, if any, Ezekiel had in mind when he wrote these chapters. In any case, the catastrophic events described in the prophet’s vision would serve as the prelude for the acknowledgment by the nations of the world that only the God of Israel is the true God.

These two chapters are echoed in Apocalyptic literature (Book of Enoch), in the Dead Sea Scrolls, in the New Testament (Revelation), and in Talmud and Midrash, which view the wars of Gog and Magog (in post-Ezekiel literature, the latter is also conceived as a person) as a sign of the imminent coming of the Messiah. Consequently, in the course of Jewish history, great armed conflicts between the nations stirred such messianic expectations, as did the struggle between Christendom and Islam..

Imran Nazar Hosein

“…Imran Nazar Hosein is a leading International Islamic Philosopher, Scholar and author, specialising in world politics, economy, eschatology , modern socio-economic/political issues and expert on international affairs. He is best-selling author of Jerusalem in the Qur’an.

Imran Nazar Hosein was born on the Caribbean island of Trinidad in 1942 to parents whose ancestors had migrated from India as indentured labourers. He studied Islam, Philosophy and International Relations at several universities and institutions of higher learning. Among them are al-Azhar University in Cairo, Egypt, the Institute of International Relations of the University of the West Indies in Trinidad, the University of Karachi in Pakistan, the Aleemiyah Institute of Islamic Studies in Karachi, Pakistan, and the Graduate Institute of International Studies in Geneva, Switzerland.

He worked for several years as a Foreign Service Officer in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Government of Trinidad and Tobago.

He lived in New York for ten years during which time he served as the Director of Islamic Studies for the Joint Committee of Muslim Organizations of Greater New York. He lectured on Islam in several American and Canadian universities, colleges, churches, synagogues, prisons, community halls, etc. He also participated in many inter-faith dialogues with Christian and Jewish scholars while representing Islam in USA. He was the Imam, for sometime, at Masjid Dar al-Qur’an in Long Island, New York. He also led the weekly Jumu’ah prayers and delivered the sermon at the headquarters of the United Nations Organization in Manhattan, New York, once a month for ten years continuously.

He is a former Principal of the Aleemiyah Institute of Islamic Studies in Karachi, Pakistan, Director of Research of the World Muslim Congress in Karachi, Pakistan, Director of the Islamic Institute for Education and Research in Miami, Florida, and Director of D’awah for Tanzeem-e-Islami of North America.

He has traveled continuously and extensively around the world on Islamic lecture-tours since graduating from the Aleemiyah Institute of Islamic Studies at age 29. And he has also written more than a dozen books on Islam that have invariably been received with public respect. Indeed, Jerusalem in the Qur’an – An Islamic View of the Destiny of Jerusalem has become a best seller and has been translated and published in several languages.

Prof. Dr. Malik Badri, Dean of the International Institute for Islamic Thought and Civilization in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, wrote the Foreword to the book.

Imran’s first book, entitled Islam and Buddhism in the Modern World was written when he was just 29 and still remains the only book on the subject by a Muslim scholar. That book won high praise from such eminent scholars as Vice Chancellor of University of Karachi and renowned historian, Dr. Ishtiaq Husain Quraishi, eminent Pakistani jurist and philosopher, A. K. Brohi, and eminent Muslim sociologist, Dr. Basharat Ali.

Maulana Dr. Fazlur Rahman Ansari, an outstanding scholar of Islam of the modern age, wrote the Foreword to that book.

Imran Hosein’s three new books, published in 2007, on ‘Surah al-Kahf’ of the Qur’an and on the subject of ‘Signs of the Last Day in the Modern Age’, offer rare insights into interpretation of the Qur’an and the Hadith of Muhammad insofar as they explain the modern age. …”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imran_Nazar_Hosein

Background Articles and Videos

Rush Limbaugh – Crony Capitalism

Financial crisis: Gov’t regulation creating crony capitalism

Paul Ryan on crony capitalism and better alternatives

BP, Big Government and Crony Capitalism

Stossel On Crony Capitalism Part 1

Stossel On Crony Capitalism Part 2

Stossel On Crony Capitalism Part 3

David Horowitz: Obama, the Muslim Brotherhood & ‘Rules for Revolution’

Geert Wilders Warning to America Part 1 of 2

Geert Wilders Warning to America Part 2 of 2

Islam will take over the World in 50 Years

Islam will take over the world and youtube is helping in

The Khilafah is coming….I can see it coming!!!!!

The Caliphate Are Comming. The Super Islamic State Ruled By The Pious Khillafah Under Law Of Islam

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

The Global Power Elite–Videos

Posted on January 24, 2011. Filed under: Banking, Blogroll, Communications, Economics, Education, Employment, Farming, Federal Government, Fiscal Policy, government, government spending, Investments, Language, Law, liberty, Life, Links, media, Monetary Policy, Money, People, Philosophy, Politics, Raves, Regulations, Resources, Taxes, Technology, Transportation, Video, War, Wealth, Wisdom | Tags: Class, Global Power Structure, Google, Income Inequaltiy, New World Order, One world government, Power Elite, Progressives, socialists |

Riz Khan – The global power elite – 22 April 08 – Part 1

Riz Khan – The global power elite – 22 April 08 – Part 2

Murray N. Rothbard–The Federal Reserve and The Power Elite–Videos

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

Joan Veon–When Central Banks Rule the World–Videos

Posted on January 24, 2011. Filed under: Banking, Blogroll, Communications, Computers, Demographics, Economics, Education, Employment, Energy, Farming, Federal Government, Fiscal Policy, Foreign Policy, government, government spending, history, Investments, Language, Law, liberty, Life, Links, media, Monetary Policy, Money, People, Philosophy, Politics, Rants, Regulations, Security, Video, Wealth, Wisdom | Tags: Central Banking, Economics, Finance, Joan Veon, Money, New World Order, Power, Videos |

“As an international reporter I have made it a point to ask the crucial questions in order that the unspoken agenda may be put into words. I have also sought to keep abreast of evolving global changes, how the world will be affected, and to report what is truth.”

~ Joan Veon

When Central Banks Rule the World – Pt.1

When Central Banks Rule the World – Pt.2

When Central Banks Rule the World – Pt.3

When Central Banks Rule the World – Pt.4

When Central Banks Rule the World – Pt.5

When Central Banks Rule the World – Pt.6

When Central Banks Rule the World – Pt.7

When Central Banks Rule the World – Pt.8

When Central Banks Rule the World – Pt.9

May she rest in peace.

End the Fed!

Background Articles and Videos

CIA Officer- Robert Steele tells it like it is. Part 1

The Complete Idiot’s Guide to the New World Order

CIA Officer Explains New World Order’s Demise

Joan Veon

THE WOMEN’S INTERNATIONAL MEDIA GROUP

http://www.womensgroup.org/

JOAN MARIE (YOCCO) VEON

“…On October 18, 2010, with her husband Rod holding her hand, Joan answered her Master’s call and slipped quietly away to be with her Lord and Savior after a courageous three year battle with breast cancer. She was 61 years old. …”

http://www.womensgroup.org/joans_obituary.html

Joan Veon’s Powerful Interview; UN Depopulation Plan Agenda 21–Public Private Partnerships

Public/Private Partnerships

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

United States Out Of United Nations and United Nations Out of United States–Videos

Posted on January 23, 2011. Filed under: Blogroll, Communications, Economics, Education, Employment, Federal Government, government, government spending, history, Investments, Language, Law, liberty, Life, Links, media, People, Philosophy, Politics, Rants, Raves, Resources, Taxes, Technology, Video, War, Wisdom | Tags: New World Order, U.N., United Nations, United States, world government |

Americans Remain Critical of the United Nations

Nevertheless, most want the organization to have a meaningful function

by Lydia Saad

http://www.gallup.com/poll/116812/americans-remain-critical-united-nations.aspx

United Nations Destroying America?

Nathan Tabor on CSPAN at CPAC 2007

The U.N. hates us let’s get out

G. Edward Griffin on the United Nations

The United Nations, Climate Change, and Money Trails

Claudia Rosett – Oslo Freedom Forum 2010

oil for food scandal

D’Escoto: “The UN has failed”

Ron Paul – United Nations GET US OUT !!!

NRA: The United Nations (UN) and International Gun Control

Obama Pushing International Gun Control Treaty CIFTA

Ambassador John Bolton on How to Fix the UN

John Bolton Q&A Part 1

John Bolton Q&A Part 2

John Bolton Q&A Part 3

Can the United Naitons Stop Genocide? Part 1.

Can the United Naitons Stop Genocide? Part 2.

United Nations Peace through Terror 1/5

United Nations Peace through Terror 2/5

United Nations Peace through Terror 3/5

United Nations Peace through Terror 4/5

United Nations Peace through Terror 5/5

Obama Sold Out Israel at UN, John Bolton

The United Nations is a Joke…

Background Articles and Videos

John Bolton on President Obama’s New International Order

The World from The Hill: U.N. funding an early target for House Republicans

“…A key House Republican is quickly pressing forward with her goals to scale back U.S. funding for the United Nations.

Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.), chairwoman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, told The Hill that oversight would be a key function of the panel, particularly funding to the United Nations Human Rights Council (HRC) that is “a waste of taxpayer dollars.” …”

“…U.N. critics set to appear include Claudia Rossett, who unveiled the oil-for-food scandal in 2004 and 2005 in The Wall Street Journal; Brett Schaefer, who regularly takes on the U.N. at the conservative Heritage Foundation; and Hillel Neuer, executive director of Geneva-based UN Watch, which monitors the controversial HRC.

Neuer told The Hill that UN Watch is going to release new data at the briefing on how the HRC has been run since then-U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan dissolved the Human Rights Commission in 2006. Annan called the commission “politicized” at the time, but the commission’s replacement, the HRC, has attracted many critics as well.

“We will commend the efforts of the U.S. delegation here in Geneva, including [Ambassador] Eileen Donohoe” in briefing the Foreign Affairs Committee, Neuer said, saying the team is “working hard to minimize the damage of the council,” but is often in the minority to powerful, controversial members such as Libya, Cuba, China, Pakistan, Russia and Saudi Arabia.

“They’re the ones who run the shop,” he said, adding of Obama’s initiative to place a U.S. representative on the council with the intention of reforming from within that it was “naive for anyone to have thought it would change significantly.” …”

http://thehill.com/news-by-subject/foreign-policy/139563-the-world-from-the-hill-un-funding-an-early-target-for-house-republicans

The Grand Design – World Government 1968 PT-1 of 8

The Grand Design – World Government 1968 PT-2 of 8

The Grand Design – World Government 1968 PT-3 of 8

The Grand Design – World Government 1968 PT-4 of 8

The Grand Design – World Government 1968 PT-5 of 8

The Grand Design – World Government 1968 PT-6 of 8

The Grand Design – World Government 1968 PT-7 of 8

The Grand Design – World Government 1968 PT-8 of 8

G Edward Griffin on New World Order

Stop the Anti-American U.N. “Law of the Sea” Treaty

Background Articles and Videos

1/5 SOCIALISM: A Clear And Present Danger! ( A Biblical Response)

2/5 SOCIALISM: A Clear And Present Danger! ( A Biblical Response)

3/5 SOCIALISM: A Clear And Present Danger! ( A Biblical Response)

4/5 SOCIALISM: A Clear And Present Danger! ( A Biblical Response)

5/5 SOCIALISM: A Clear And Present Danger! ( A Biblical Response)

1/6 Global America: Rebuilding the Tower of Babel!

2/6 Global America: Rebuilding the Tower of Babel!

3/6 Global America: Rebuilding the Tower of Babel!

4/6 Global America: Rebuilding the Tower of Babel!

5/6 Global America: Rebuilding the Tower of Babel!

6/6 Global America: Rebuilding the Tower of Babel!

Year	Gross Debt in Billions undeflated^[10]	as % of GDP	Debt Held By Public ($Billions)	as % of GDP
1910	2.6	unk.	2.6	unk.
1920	25.9	unk.	25.9	unk.
1928	18.5^[11]	unk.	18.5	unk.
1930	16.2	unk.	16.2	unk.
1940	50.6	52.4	42.8	44.2
1950	256.8	94.0	219.0	80.2
1960	290.5	56.0	236.8	45.6
1970	380.9	37.6	283.2	28.0
1980	909.0	33.4	711.9	26.1
1990	3,206.3	55.9	2,411.6	42.0
2000	5,628.7	58.0	3,409.8	35.1
2001	5,769.9	57.4	3,319.6	33.0
2002	6,198.4	59.7	3,540.4	34.1
2003	6,760.0	62.6	3,913.4	35.1
2004	7,354.7	63.9	4,295.5	37.3
2005	7,905.3	64.6	4,592.2	37.5
2006	8,451.4	65.0	4,829.0	37.1
2007	8,950.7	65.6	5,035.1	36.9
2008	9,985.8	70.2	5,802.7	40.8
2009	12,311.4	86.1	7,811.1	54.6
2010 (2 Nov)	13,724.0	93.2 (3rd Q)	9,133.6	62.0 (3rd Q)
2010 (est.)	14,456.3	98.1	9,881.9	67.1
2011 (est.)	15,673.9	101.0	10,873.1	70.1
2012 (est.)	16,565.7	100.6	11,468.4	69.6
2013 (est.)	17,440.2	99.7	12,027.1	68.7
2014 (est.)	18,350.0	99.8	12,594.8	68.5

Background Articles and Videos

GLENN BECK WARNS OF CATASTROPHIC EVENT & NEEDING TO STOCKPILE FOOD

Peter Schiff Was Right 2006 – 2007 (2nd Edition)

Peter Schiff – Fed panel

Vickers Was Right

Damon Vickers on Alex Jones Tv 1/6:A New Financial Order!!

Damon Vickers on Alex Jones Tv 2/6:A New Financial Order!!

Damon Vickers on Alex Jones Tv 3/6:A New Financial Order!!

Damon Vickers on Alex Jones Tv 4/6:A New Financial Order!!

Damon Vickers on Alex Jones Tv 5/6:A New Financial Order!!

Damon Vickers on Alex Jones Tv 6/6:A New Financial Order!!

Background Articles and Videos

The Massive Fraud In Mortgages Continues–Crooks and Corrupt Politicians In Charge–Videos

Inflation and Debt: The Interaction of Fiscal and Monetary Policy (Part 1)

Inflation and Debt: The Interaction of Fiscal and Monetary Policy (Part 2)

Inflation and Debt: The Interaction of Fiscal and Monetary Policy (Part 3)

Inflation and Debt: The Interaction of Fiscal and Monetary Policy (Part 4)

Inflation and Debt: The Interaction of Fiscal and Monetary Policy (Part 5)

Inflation and Debt: The Interaction of Fiscal and Monetary Policy (Part 6)

Inflation and Debt: The Interaction of Fiscal and Monetary Policy (Part 7)

Richard W. Fisher Speech: Historical Perspectives on the Current Financial Crisis (Part 1)

(Part 2) Richard W. Fisher Speech: Historical Perspectives on the Current Financial Crisis

(Part 3) Richard W. Fisher Speech: Historical Perspectives on the Current Financial Crisis

Peter Schiff

“…Peter David Schiff (pronounced /ˈʃɪf/; born March 23, 1963) is an American businessman, author, financial commentator, and a former 2010 Republican primary candidate for the United States Senate.^[12]

Schiff is president and chief global strategist of Euro Pacific Capital Inc., a broker-dealer based in Westport, Connecticut.^[1] Schiff frequently appears as a guest on CNBC, Fox News, and Bloomberg Television and is often quoted in major financial publications^[13] and is a frequent guest on internet radio^[14]^[15]^[16] as well as the former host of the podcast Wall Street Unspun^[17] and the current host of the The Peter Schiff Show.

He is known for his bearish views on the dollar and dollar denominated assets, while bullish on investment in tangible assets, as well as foreign stocks and currencies.

Financial career

Schiff began his career as a financial consultant at a Shearson Lehman Brothers brokerage.^[1] In 1996 Schiff and a partner acquired a small brokerage firm that had been founded in 1980, reincorporated it in California and renamed it Euro Pacific Capital.^[18] The company today has more than 15,000 clients^{[citation needed]} and six offices nationwide, with its headquarters in Westport, Connecticut.^[19]^[19] ^[20]

According to a 2005 article in The Advocate of Stamford, Connecticut Schiff relocated the firm to Darien, Connecticut to find brokers “who think like him”. The New York Metropolitan Area, Schiff says, has the biggest concentration of brokers in the country, making it easier to recruit employees.^[21] The company has offices in Newport Beach, California as well as in Scottsdale, Arizona, Palm Beach, Florida, Los Angeles and New York. Euro Pacific Capital also holds the exclusive rights to broker some Perth Mint gold products in the United States.^[22]

Economic forecasting

Schiff attributes his economic forecasts to an understanding of the Austrian School,^[23] a school of economic thought generally categorized as heterodox (or non-mainstream).^[23]^[24]^[25] Schiff voices strong support for the Austrian School, and says it was first introduced to him by his father, Irwin Schiff.^[26] Schiff admits his economic views are not mainstream, and like the Austrian School, he makes judgments without a strict adherence to economic statistics.^{[citation needed]}

U.S. bear market

In his 2007 book, Crash Proof, Schiff writes that the current United States economic policies are fundamentally unsound, and predicts that in the future the United States dollar will lose much of its value.^[3]

Schiff feels that the imbalance between the amount of goods the U.S. consumes and what it produces will eventually lead to problems for the U.S. economy.^[27]^[28] As a remedy Schiff favors increased personal savings and production which he says will stimulate economic growth.^[29] Schiff cites the U.S.’s low personal savings rate as one of the causes of the its transformation from the world’s largest creditor nation in the 1970s to the largest debtor nation in the year 2000.^[30] Schiff attributes the low savings rate to higher inflation and the artificially low interest rates set by the Federal Reserve.^[31]

In a 2002 interview with Southland Today, Schiff predicted that the economic downturn triggered by the bursting of the stock market bubble would lead to a bear market likely to last “another 5 to 10 years.”^[32]^[33] In November 2002, US stocks began a bull market uptrend which held steady for at least five years,^[34] until reversing course in 2008, when the Dow, NASDAQ, and S&P 500 began a decline to less than half of their peak 2008 values,^[35] followed in 2009 by the Dow climbing 61% from its low point over the following year.^[36] After interviewing Schiff in 2009, journalist and finance author Eric Tyson, referenced various Schiff predictions during the 2000s and stated that “On all of these counts, Schiff wasn’t just wrong but ended up being hugely wrong.”^[37] Schiff later released a video stating that, “When I gave that interview in 2002, I had no way of knowing how irresponsible the Fed was going to be … But I recognized that early: back in 2003 and 2004 I changed my forecast … if you look at what happened to the Dow in terms of gold [and not U.S. dollars], my forecast was extremely accurate.”^[32]

In an August 2006 interview he said: “The United States economy is like the Titanic and I am here with the lifeboat trying to get people to leave the ship… I see a real financial crisis coming for the United States.”^[38] On December 31, 2006 in debate on Fox News, Schiff forecast that “what’s going to happen in 2007″ is that “real estate prices are going to come crashing back down to Earth”.^[38]

As part of these exchanges on Fox News and his repeated appearances on financial news network CNBC, Schiff had mentioned factors such as speculators and “the absence of lending standards” which are now seen by many^[39]^[40] to indeed be contributing factors to the housing crisis of 2007-2009. On December 13, 2007 in a Bloomberg interview on the show Open Exchange, Schiff further added that he felt that the crisis would extend to the credit card lending industry.^[41] Following this observation, it was soon reported on December 23, 2007 by the Associated Press that “The value of credit card accounts at least 30 days late jumped 26 percent to $17.3 billion in October from a year earlier at 17 large credit card trusts examined by the AP… At the same time, defaults — when lenders essentially give up hope of ever being repaid and write off the debt — rose 18 percent to almost $961 million in October, according to filings made by the trusts with the Securities and Exchange Commission.”^[42]

Since 2007, Schiff has stated many times that if the government doesn’t change course there will be hyperinflation in the US.^[3] Schiff is one of a minority of economists credited with accurately predicting the financial crisis of 2007–2010 while “nearly all [macroeconomists] failed to foresee the recession despite plenty of warning signs”.^[43]^[44] In his book Crash Proof, he described several aspects of the U.S. economy that would lead to a recession.^[3] …”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Schiff

Remarks by Governor Ben S. Bernanke
Before the National Economists Club, Washington, D.C.
November 21, 2002 Deflation: Making Sure “It” Doesn’t Happen Here

“…Deflation: Its Causes and Effects
Deflation is defined as a general decline in prices, with emphasis on the word “general.” At any given time, especially in a low-inflation economy like that of our recent experience, prices of some goods and services will be falling. Price declines in a specific sector may occur because productivity is rising and costs are falling more quickly in that sector than elsewhere or because the demand for the output of that sector is weak relative to the demand for other goods and services. Sector-specific price declines, uncomfortable as they may be for producers in that sector, are generally not a problem for the economy as a whole and do not constitute deflation. Deflation per se occurs only when price declines are so widespread that broad-based indexes of prices, such as the consumer price index, register ongoing declines.

The sources of deflation are not a mystery. Deflation is in almost all cases a side effect of a collapse of aggregate demand–a drop in spending so severe that producers must cut prices on an ongoing basis in order to find buyers.¹ Likewise, the economic effects of a deflationary episode, for the most part, are similar to those of any other sharp decline in aggregate spending–namely, recession, rising unemployment, and financial stress.

However, a deflationary recession may differ in one respect from “normal” recessions in which the inflation rate is at least modestly positive: Deflation of sufficient magnitude may result in the nominal interest rate declining to zero or very close to zero.² Once the nominal interest rate is at zero, no further downward adjustment in the rate can occur, since lenders generally will not accept a negative nominal interest rate when it is possible instead to hold cash. At this point, the nominal interest rate is said to have hit the “zero bound.”

Deflation great enough to bring the nominal interest rate close to zero poses special problems for the economy and for policy. First, when the nominal interest rate has been reduced to zero, the real interest rate paid by borrowers equals the expected rate of deflation, however large that may be.³ To take what might seem like an extreme example (though in fact it occurred in the United States in the early 1930s), suppose that deflation is proceeding at a clip of 10 percent per year. Then someone who borrows for a year at a nominal interest rate of zero actually faces a 10 percent real cost of funds, as the loan must be repaid in dollars whose purchasing power is 10 percent greater than that of the dollars borrowed originally. In a period of sufficiently severe deflation, the real cost of borrowing becomes prohibitive. Capital investment, purchases of new homes, and other types of spending decline accordingly, worsening the economic downturn. …”

“….Conclusion
Sustained deflation can be highly destructive to a modern economy and should be strongly resisted. Fortunately, for the foreseeable future, the chances of a serious deflation in the United States appear remote indeed, in large part because of our economy’s underlying strengths but also because of the determination of the Federal Reserve and other U.S. policymakers to act preemptively against deflationary pressures. Moreover, as I have discussed today, a variety of policy responses are available should deflation appear to be taking hold. Because some of these alternative policy tools are relatively less familiar, they may raise practical problems of implementation and of calibration of their likely economic effects. For this reason, as I have emphasized, prevention of deflation is preferable to cure. Nevertheless, I hope to have persuaded you that the Federal Reserve and other economic policymakers would be far from helpless in the face of deflation, even should the federal funds rate hit its zero bound.¹⁹

http://www.federalreserve.gov/BOARDDOCS/SPEECHES/2002/20021121/default.htm

Alex Jones

“…Alexander Emerick Jones (born February 11, 1974) is an American talk radio host, actor and filmmaker. His syndicated news/talk show The Alex Jones Show, based in Austin, Texas, airs via the Genesis Communication Network over sixty AM, FM, and shortwave radio stations across the United States and on the Internet.^[1] His websites include Infowars.com and PrisonPlanet.com.^[2]

Mainstream news sources have referred to him as right-wing,^[3]^[4]^[5] conservative,^[6]^[7]^[8]^[9] and a conspiracy theorist.^[10]^[11]^[12]

Jones sees himself as a libertarian, and rejects being described as a right-winger.^[13] He has also called himself a paleoconservative.^[14] In a promotional biography he is described as an “aggressive constitutionalist”.^[15]^[16]

Jones was born on February 11, 1974 in Dallas, Texas,^[17] and grew up in the suburb of Rockwall. His father is a dentist.^[18] He graduated from Anderson High School in northwest Austin, Texas in 1993. After high school he briefly attended Austin Community College.

He began his career in Austin with a live, call-in format cable access television program. In 1996, Jones switched format to KJFK, hosting a show named The Final Edition.^[19] In 1998, he released his first film, America Destroyed By Design

In 1998, Jones spearheaded an effort to build a memorial for the members who died at the David Koresh-led Branch Davidian compound/church near Waco, Texas, including the ATF officers who died.^{[citation needed]} He often featured the project on his cable access program and claimed that Koresh and his followers were peaceful people who were murdered by Attorney General Janet Reno and the ATF in the infamous Waco Siege.^[19]

In 1999, he tied with Shannon Burke for that year’s “Best Austin Talk Radio Host” poll as voted by The Austin Chronicle readers.^[20] Later that year, he was fired from KJFK-FM. According to the station’s operations manager, Jones was fired because his viewpoints made the show hard to sell to advertisers and he refused to broaden his topics.^[19] Jones argued: “It was purely political, and it came down from on high,” and, “I was told 11 weeks ago to lay off Clinton, to lay off all these politicians, to not talk about rebuilding the church, to stop bashing the Marines, A to Z.”^[19]

In early 2000, Jones was one of seven Republican candidates for state representative in Texas House District 48, an open seat swing district based in Austin, Texas. Jones stated that he was running, “to be a watchdog on the inside.”^[21] He aborted his campaign and withdrew before the March primary when polls indicated he had little chance of winning.

In July 2000, a group of Austin Community Access Center (ACAC) programmers claimed that Jones used legal proceedings and ACAC policy to intimidate them or get their shows thrown off the air. The programmers made their views known via radio broadcast and websites.^[22] Also in 2000, Jones and assistant Mike Hanson infiltrated Bohemian Grove and filmed the opening weekend ceremony, known as the Cremation of Care, claiming it to be mock child sacrifice in front of a 40-foot-tall (12 m) stone owl of Moloch.

On June 8, 2006, while on his way to cover a meeting of the Bilderberg group in Ottawa, Canada, Jones was stopped and detained at the Ottawa airport by Canadian authorities who confiscated his passport, camera equipment, and most of his belongings. He was later allowed to enter Canada lawfully. Jones said regarding the reason for his immigration hold, “I want to say, on the record, it takes two to tango. I could have handled it better.”^[23]

On September 8, 2007, he was arrested while protesting at 6th Avenue and 48th Street in New York City. He was charged with operating a bullhorn without a permit. Two others were also cited for disorderly conduct when his group crashed a live television show featuring Geraldo Rivera. In an article, one of Jones’s fellow protesters said “It was … guerilla information warfare.”^[24]

Media

The Alex Jones Show

The Alex Jones Show syndicated radio program is broadcast nationally by Genesis Communications Network to more than 60 AM and FM radio stations in the United States, and to WWCR Radio shortwave. Live-broadcast times are weekdays 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. CST and Sundays from 4:00 to 6:00 p.m. CST. The Sunday broadcast is also broadcast by Emmis Communications’ KLBJ Radio. All broadcasts are also available online at prisonplanet.com and infowars.com for live, streaming, podcast or smartphone listening.^[25]

Guests have included congressman Ron Paul, country music icon Willie Nelson, former Minnesota governor Jesse Ventura, author and speaker Jordan Maxwell, actor Charlie Sheen, rapper KRS-One, musician Shooter Jennings, Muse frontman Matthew Bellamy, British politicians Nigel Farage and Christopher Monckton, trends researcher Gerald Celente, musician Dave Mustaine of Megadeth, antiwar activist Cindy Sheehan, writer David Icke, the Rev. Ted Pike,^[26] the Rev. Lindsey Williams, as well as various other guests.

Websites

Alex Jones is also the operator of several web sites centered on news and information about civil liberties issues, global government, and a wide variety of current events topics. The best known of these sites are http://www.infowars.com and http://www.prisonplanet.com.^{[citation needed]}

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alex_Jones_%28radio_host%29

Is Glenn Beck for Real?

Who Really Runs the New World Order Exposed: Part 2 of “Is Glenn Beck for Real?”

Background Articles and Videos

Daniel Estulin on Bilderberg 2009

Alex Jones – Jim Tucker:Bilderberg 2009 Pt1

Alex Jones – Jim Tucker:Bilderberg 2009 Pt2

Jim Tucker on Bilderberg 2009

Brzezinski on CFR, Bilderberg, and Trilateral Commission

Investigative Author, Daniel Estulin Exposes Bilderberg Group Plans

International best-selling investigative author Daniel Estulin has received from his sources the 73-page Bilderberg Group meeting wrap-up for participants.

“…– International best-selling investigative author Daniel Estulin has received from his sources the 73-page Bilderberg Group meeting wrap-up for participants. In the report no one is identified by name, only as an American or European, or by a description of the speaker’s position, i.e. member of the IMF. There appears to be some disagreement about who was in attendance at this year’s secretive conclave held at a 5-star resort in Greece. According to sources in Greece and the Bilderberg Netherlands “office,” US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and US General David Petraeus were at this year’s gathering. Both men have denied this, according to a conversation held with a Washington, DC reporter, who stated that Mr. Geithner was attending a private function and General Petraeus was at Central Command.

Using a purported participant list, a “smear” campaign has seemingly been launched against Estulin. On a French “left-wing” website (www.bellaciao.org/fr/), and then posted in English on a populist forum in the US (http://forum.prisonplanet.com), it is claimed that Estulin was a known participant in this year’s conference. “Hardly,” said Estulin, who laughed at the prospect, saying that the Group has tried many things to keep him from reporting on its activities, but had never asked him to attend. Estulin did his reporting this year from Spain, knowing from years of coverage that the location in Greece physically precluded any photographing of the participants. His book on the shadowy clique, ”The True Story of the Bilderberg Group” broke through the barrier that the Group even existed with help from numerous photographs exposing the elite that were taken by Estulin from 600-800 meters. The book has been translated into 48 languages and sold millions of copies worldwide. Estulin’s reportage of the annual meetings has led to many correct predictions of world events, including the timing of the 2003 Iraqi War, the rise and fall of oil prices, as well as the current economic calamity and housing mess. …”

http://www.prweb.com/releases/Bilderberg_Group_Meeting/Daniel_Estulin/prweb2453144.htm

Bilderberger Group

“… The Bilderberg Group, Bilderberg conference, or Bilderberg Club is an annual, unofficial, invitation-only conference of around 130 guests, most of whom are people of influence in the fields of politics, banking, business, the military and media. Each conference is closed to the public and the press.

Origin

The original conference was held at the Hotel de Bilderberg, near Arnhem in The Netherlands, from 29 May to 31 May 1954. It was initiated by several people, including Józef Retinger, concerned about the growth of anti-Americanism in Western Europe, who proposed an international conference at which leaders from European countries and the United States would be brought together with the aim of promoting atlanticism – better understanding between the cultures of the United States and Western Europe in order to foster cooperation on political, economic, and defense issues.[1] Retinger approached Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands, who agreed to promote the idea, together with Belgian Prime Minister Paul Van Zeeland, and the head of Unilever at that time, Dutchman Paul Rijkens. Bernhard in turn contacted Walter Bedell Smith, then head of the CIA, who asked Eisenhower adviser Charles Douglas Jackson to deal with the suggestion.[2] The guest list was to be drawn up by inviting two attendees from each nation, one of each to represent conservative and liberal points of view.[1] Fifty delegates from 11 countries in Western Europe attended the first conference along with 11 Americans.[3]

The success of the meeting led the organizers to arrange an annual conference. A permanent Steering Committee was established, with Retinger appointed as permanent secretary. As well as organizing the conference, the steering committee also maintained a register of attendee names and contact details, with the aim of creating an informal network of individuals who could call upon one another in a private capacity.[citation needed] Conferences were held in France, Germany, and Denmark over the following three years. In 1957, the first US conference was held in St. Simons, Georgia, with $30,000 from the Ford Foundation. The foundation supplied further funding for the 1959 and 1963 conferences.[2]

Organizational structure

Meetings are organized by a steering committee with two members from each of around eighteen nations.[4] Official posts, in addition to a chairman, include an Honorary Secretary General.[5] There is no such category in the group’s rules as a “member of the group”. The only category that exists is “member of the Steering Committee”.[6] In addition to the committee, there also exists a separate advisory group, though membership overlaps.[7]

Dutch economist Ernst van der Beugel took over as permanent secretary in 1960, upon Retinger’s death. Prince Bernhard continued to serve as the meeting’s chairman until 1976, the year of his involvement in the Lockheed affair. The position of Honorary American Secretary General has been held successively by Joseph E. Johnson of the Carnegie Endowment, William Bundy of Princeton, Theodore L. Eliot, Jr., former U.S. Ambassador to Afghanistan, and Casimir A. Yost of Georgetown’s Institute for the Study of Diplomacy.[8]

A 2008 press release from the American Friends of Bilderberg stated that “Bilderberg’s only activity is its annual Conference. At the meetings, no resolutions are proposed, no votes taken, and no policy statements issued” and noted that the names of attendees were available to the press.[9] The Bilderberg group unofficial headquarters is the University of Leiden in the Netherlands.[10]

According to the American Friends of Bilderberg, the 2008 agenda dealt “mainly with a nuclear free world, cyber terrorism, Africa, Russia, finance, protectionism, US-EU relations, Afghanistan and Pakistan, Islam and Iran”.[9]

Chairmen

Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands (1954–1975)[11]
Alec Douglas-Home (1977–1980)[11]
Walter Scheel[3]
Eric Roll (1986–1989)[12]
Lord Carrington (1990–1998)[3]
Étienne Davignon[4]
Conspiracy theories
Because of its secrecy and refusal to issue news releases, the group is frequently accused of secretive and nefarious plots. Critics include the John Birch Society, a producerist advocacy group in the United States,[21] Canadian writer Daniel Estulin, British writer David Icke, American writer Jim Tucker, politician Jesse Ventura and radio host Alex Jones. The Bilderberg Group was the topic of a 2009 episode of the TruTV series Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura.[22]

Bilderberg founding member and, for 30 years, a steering committee member, Denis Healey has said:[23]

To say we were striving for a one-world government is exaggerated, but not wholly unfair. Those of us in Bilderberg felt we couldn’t go on forever fighting one another for nothing and killing people and rendering millions homeless. So we felt that a single community throughout the world would be a good thing.
In 2005 the then chairman Etienne Davignon discussed these accusations with the BBC.

It is unavoidable and it doesn’t matter. There will always be people who believe in conspiracies but things happen in a much more incoherent fashion…When people say this is a secret government of the world I say that if we were a secret government of the world we should be bloody ashamed of ourselves.[24]
G. William Domhoff, a research professor in psychology and sociology who studies theories of power, sees the role of social clubs such as Bilderberg as being nothing more than a means to create social cohesion within a power elite. He adds that those understandings of the clubs such as the Bilderberg fit with the perceptions of the members of the elite. In a 2004 interview with New Internationalist magazine, Domhoff warns progressives against getting distracted by conspiracy theories which demonize and scapegoat such clubs. He argues that the opponents of progressivism are corporate elite, the Republican Party, and conservative Democrats. It is the same people more or less, but it puts them in their most important roles, as capitalists and political leaders, which are visible.[25]

Origins of conspiracy theories

Before the 2001 meeting, a report in the Guardian stated:

…the press have never been allowed access and all discussions are under Chatham House rules (no quoting). Not surprisingly, such ground rules, while attracting publicity-shy financiers, have also fuelled the fantasies of conspiracy theorists.[26]
Jonathan Duffy, writing in BBC News Online Magazine states:

No reporters are invited in and while confidential minutes of meetings are taken, names are not noted… In the void created by such aloofness, an extraordinary conspiracy theory has grown up around the group that alleges the fate of the world is largely decided by Bilderberg.[27]
Investigative journalist Chip Berlet, notes the existence of Bilderberger conspiracy theories as early as 1964 in the writings of conservative political activist Phyllis Schlafly. In Berlet’s 1994 report Right Woos Left, published by Political Research Associates, he writes:

The views on intractable godless communism expressed by Schwarz were central themes in three other bestselling books which were used to mobilize support for the 1964 Barry Goldwater campaign. The best known was Phyllis Schlafly’s A Choice, Not an Echo, which suggested a conspiracy theory in which the Republican Party was secretly controlled by elitist intellectuals dominated by members of the Bilderberger group, whose policies would pave the way for global communist conquest.[28]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bilderberg_Group

Background Articles and Videos

Immigration Gumballs

Lou Dobbs – Problems with the U.S. Legal Immigration System

Cost of Illegal Immigration

Stop Amnesty for Illegal Immigrants – Expert Reveals the True Cost of Amnesty

The Enduring Appeal of Sarah Palin

Rick Perry Has Concerns over Arizona Immigration Bill

“…While some local lawmakers across the country are condemning the law and moving to boycott business with Arizona, others are praising it and calling for similar laws in their own states. There are some state representatives in Texas who say their state should adopt a strict immigration measure like Arizona’s.

But Perry, who bragged earlier this week about shooting a coyote and suggested last year that his state could secede from the United States, explained why he thinks the Arizona law is flawed.

“Some aspects of the law turn law enforcement officers into immigration officials by requiring them to determine immigration status during any lawful contact with a suspected alien, taking them away from their existing law enforcement duties, which are critical to keeping citizens safe,” Perry said.

Meanwhile, the Arizona legislature yesterday moved to modify the new law in order to address the concerns raised by Perry and others, the Arizona Republic reports.

State lawmakers proposed changes the phrase “lawful contact” to “lawful stop, detention or arrest” in order to clarify that officers would not need to question presumably innocent parties, such as crime victims or witnesses, about their immigration status. They also moved to eliminate the word “solely” from the sentence “A law enforcement official or agency… may not solely consider race, color or national origin” in establishing “reasonable suspicion” that a person is in the country illegally. They also clarified that an officer is required to verify a person’s immigration status if there is “reasonable suspicion” to doubt it when responding to city ordinance violations, which could include responding to loud parties or barking dogs. …”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWCORBgeKR0

Gov. Perry Backs Resolution Affirming Texas Sovereignty Under 10th Amendment – Part 2

Alex Jones on Illegal Immigration – Part 1/12

Alex Jones on Illegal Immigration – Part 2/12

Alex Jones on Illegal Immigration – Part 3/12

Alex Jones on Illegal Immigration – Part 4/12

Alex Jones on Illegal Immigration – Part 5/12

Alex Jones on Illegal Immigration – Part 6/12

Alex Jones on Illegal Immigration – Part 7/12

Alex Jones on Illegal Immigration – Part 8/12

Alex Jones on Illegal Immigration – Part 9/12

Alex Jones on Illegal Immigration – Part 10/12

Alex Jones on Illegal Immigration – Part 11/12

Alex Jones on Illegal Immigration – Part 12/12

In Full: Palin’s Tea Party Speech

Background Articles and Videos

Alan Watt on Alex Jones Tv 1/4:Who is Maurice Strong?

Alan Watt on Alex Jones Tv 2/4:Who is Maurice Strong?

Alan Watt on Alex Jones Tv 3/4:Who is Maurice Strong?

Alan Watt on Alex Jones Tv 4/4:Who is Maurice Strong?

Who is Maurice Strong?

“…”THE survival of civilization in something like its present form might depend significantly on the efforts of a single man,” declared The New Yorker. The New York Times hailed that man as the “Custodian of the Planet.” He is perpetually on the short list of candidates for Secretary General of the United Nations. This lofty eminence? Maurice Strong, of course. Never heard of him? Well, you should have. Militia members are famously worried that black helicopters are practicing maneuvers with blue-helmeted UN troops in a plot to take over America. But the actual peril is more subtle. A small cadre of obscure international bureaucrats are hard at work devising a system of “global governance” that is slowly gaining control over ordinary Americans’ lives. Maurice Strong, a 68-year-old Canadian, is the “indispensable man” at the center of this creeping UN power grab. …”

“…In short, “While on the board of a Chicago-based charity, Barack Obama helped fund a carbon trading exchange that will likely play a critical role in the cap-and-trade carbon reduction program he is now trying to push through Congress as president.”

The charity was the Joyce Foundation on whose board of directors Obama served and which gave nearly $1.1 million in two separate grants that were “instrumental in developing and launching the privately-owned Chicago Climate Exchange, which now calls itself “North America’s only cap and trade system for all six greenhouse gases, with global affiliates and projects worldwide.”

And that’s only the beginning of this tawdry tale, Mr. Barnes.

The “privately-owned” Chicago Climate Exchange is heavily influenced by Obama cohorts Al Gore and Maurice Strong.

For years now Strong and Gore have been cashing in on that lucrative cottage industry known as man-made global warming.

Strong is on the board of directors of the Chicago Climate Exchange, Wikipedia-described as “the world’s first and North America’s only legally binding greenhouse gas emission registry reduction system for emission sources and offset projects in North America and Brazil.” …”

http://the-classic-liberal.com/maurice-strong/

INTERNATIONAL MAN OF MYSTERY: WHO IS MAURICE STRONG?

The adventures of Maurice Strong & Co. illustrate the fact that
nowadays you don’t have to be a household name to wield global power.

By Ronald Bailey Published in The National Review September 1, 1997

WHO IS MAURICE STRONG?

“…For the time being, however, Annan and Strong have avoided calling for global taxes or user fees to finance the UN. One spokesman said that the issue was simply “too hot to handle right now.” What they propose is a Revolving Credit Fund of $1 billion so that the UN will have a source of operating funds even if a major contributor (e.g., the U.S.) withholds contributions for a time. In short, the CGG’s blueprint for a more powerful UN closely resembles the movement to expand the requirements of the Framework Convention on Global Climate Change. While the process may be piecemeal, the goal is clear: a more powerful set of international institutions, increasingly emancipated from the control of the major powers, increasingly accountable not to representative democratic institutions but to unelected bureaucracies, and increasingly exercising authority over how people, companies, and governments run their affairs — not just Americans, but everyone. In short, Col. Qaddafi’s definition of his leftist Green Revolution: “Committees Everywhere.”

If so, the future looks good for Maurice Strong. One UN source suggested that, at the very least, he would like to be made Secretary General of the Millennium Assembly or the People’s Assembly. Others suspect that, even at age 68, Strong is angling to be the next UN Secretary General.

Such eminence may help explain a puzzling incident in his early career. Having long had political ambitions, he decided to enter the Canadian Parliament. A candidate was evicted from a safe constituency by the Liberal leadership, and Strong moved in. Then, with only a month to go before the 1979 election, he suddenly pulled out of the race. Strong’s business deals were especially complicated at the time — he was setting up a Swiss oil-and-gas exploration company with partners that included the Kuwaiti Finance Minister and the Arab Petroleum Investment Corporation — and that is the explanation usually given. But maybe he just decided that for a man who wants power, elections are an unnecessary obstacle.”

http://www.afn.org/~govern/strong.html

Maurice Strong: The new guy in your future!

By Henry Lamb
January, 1997

“…”In an essay by Strong entitled Stockholm to Rio: A Journey Down a Generation, he says:

“Strengthening the role the United Nations can play…will require serious examination of the need to extend into the international arena the rule of law and the principle of taxation to finance agreed actions which provide the basis for governance at the national level. But this will not come about easily. Resistance to such changes is deeply entrenched. They will come about not through the embrace of full blown world government, but as a careful and pragmatic response to compelling imperatives and the inadequacies of alternatives.”"The concept of national sovereignty has been an immutable, indeed sacred, principle of international relations. It is a principle which will yield only slowly and reluctantly to the new imperatives of global environmental cooperation. What is needed is recognition of the reality that in so many fields, and this is particularly true of environmental issues, it is simply not feasible for sovereignty to be exercised unilaterally by individual nation-states, however powerful. The global community must be assured of environmental security.”[8]

Maurice Strong has demonstrated an uncanny ability to manipulate people, institutions, governments, and events to achieve the outcome he desires. Through his published writings and public presentations he has declared his desire to empower the U.N. as the global authority to manage a new era of global governance. He has positioned his NGO triumvirite, the IUCN, WWF, and the WRI, to varnish U.N. activity with the perception of “civil society” respectability. And now he has been appointed Senior Advisor to the U.N. Secretary General and assigned the responsibility of reforming the United Nations bureaucracy. The fox has been given the assignment, and all the tools necessary, to repair the henhouse to his liking.

http://www.sovereignty.net/p/sd/strong.html

Fight Kyoto Book Excerpt featured in the Calgary
Sun and Edmonton Sun

“…He knows how he is viewed by opponents to his radical environmentalism, or his promotion of a UN government with taxation and enforcement powers that trump national governments. And he seems to rather enjoy being described as a man at the centre of secretive power-brokering.

“Sure, these are but the deluded and paranoid ravings of the Western far right, and I wouldn’t normally trouble to mention them at all,” Strong writes in his self-conscious autobiography, “Except that my reaction when I hear a few of these charges is that I wish I had a smidgen of the power (and money!) they say I have.

“I wish I could accomplish a few of the things they already attribute to me. I do wish I could assist my many friends and colleagues in all the organizations I belong to, to remake the political and economic landscape.”

But this is Strong feigning modesty, and not very convincingly. Later in his autobiography, he reprints his ostentatious seven-page resume, boasting every connection he has.

His book takes name-dropping to a new level, including a seven-page “name index,” a list of hundreds of blue-chip associates that Strong has in his Rolodex.

Maurice Strong: A Dr. Evil-style strategist. Owner of a 200,000-acre New Age Zen colony. Designer of a proposal to “consider” requiring licences to have babies.

The architect of the Kyoto Protocol.”

http://www.taxtyranny.ca/images/HTML/Maurice-Strong/article1.html

Maurice Strong

“…Maurice F. Strong, PC, CC, OM, FRSC (born April 29, 1929) is a Canadian businessman. He is an entrepreneur, environmentalist, and one of the world’s leading proponents of the United Nations’s involvement in world affairs.

Born in Oak Lake, Manitoba, Strong had his start as a petroleum entrepreneur and became president of Power Corporation until 1966. In the early 1970s he was Secretary-General of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment and then became the first Executive Director of the United Nations Environment Programme. He returned to Canada to become Chief Executive Officer of Petro-Canada from 1976 to 1978. He headed Ontario Hydro, one of North Americas largest power utilities, was national President and Chairman of the Extension Committee of the World Alliance of YMCAs, and headed American Water Development Incorporated.

Today Strong lives in the People’s Republic of China,[citation needed] and is President of the Council of the United Nations’s University for Peace. UPEACE is the only university in the UN system able to grant degrees at the masters and doctoral. He is an active honorary professor at Peking University and Honorary Chairman of its Environmental Foundation. He is Chairman of the Advisory Board for the Institute for Research on Security and Sustainability for Northeast Asia.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maurice_Strong

Al Gore and Maurice Strong – Con Artists Extraordinaire!

‘…There’s an elephant in global warming’s living room that few in the mainstream media want to talk about: the creators of the carbon credit scheme are the ones cashing in on it.

The two cherub like choirboys singing loudest in the Holier Than Thou Global Warming Cathedral are Maurice Strong and Al Gore.

This duo has done more than anyone else to advance the alarmism of man-made global warming.

With little media monitoring, both Strong and Gore are cashing in on the lucrative cottage industry known as man-made global warming. …”

1972 United Nations Conference on the Human Environment (Part 1)

1972 United Nations Conference on the Human Environment (Part 2)

Czech Republic President Vaclav Klaus Speaks On Democracy

Agenda 21 & the Club of Rome

Club of Rome member Maurice Strong, global government discussed on Glenn Beck

Background Articles and Videos

Maurice Strong–Videos

Glenn Beck Exposes The Crime of The Century By The Progressive Radical Socialist Democratic Party–The Global Warming Investment Fraud, Political Scam and Science Scandal–Extorting and Robbing The American People–Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Case!

Conspiracy Theory Jesse Ventura – Global Warming – Part 1/6 [EPISODE 3]

Conspiracy Theory Jesse Ventura – Global Warming – Part 2/6 [EPISODE 3]

Conspiracy Theory Jesse Ventura – Global Warming – Part 3/6 [EPISODE 3]

Conspiracy Theory Jesse Ventura – Global Warming – Part 4/6 [EPISODE 3]

Conspiracy Theory Jesse Ventura – Global Warming – Part 5/6 [EPISODE 3]

Conspiracy Theory Jesse Ventura – Global Warming – Part 6/6 [EPISODE 3]

Founder of Chicago Climate Exchange Richard Sandor at Emory’s Goizueta Business School

Background Articles and Videos

Freemasonary

“…Freemasonry is a fraternal organisation that arose from obscure origins in the late 16th to early 17th century. Freemasonry now exists in various forms all over the world, with a membership estimated at around five million, including just under two million in the United States and around 480,000 in England, Scotland and Ireland.^[1]^[2] The various forms all share moral and metaphysical ideals, which include, in most cases, a constitutional declaration of belief in a Supreme Being.^[3]

The fraternity is administratively organised into Grand Lodges or sometimes Orients, each of which governs its own jurisdiction, which consists of subordinate (or constituent) Lodges. Grand Lodges recognise each other through a process of landmarks and regularity. There are also appendant bodies, which are organisations related to the main branch of Freemasonry, but with their own independent administration.

Freemasonry uses the metaphors of operative stonemasons’ tools and implements, against the allegorical backdrop of the building of King Solomon’s Temple, to convey what has been described by both Masons and critics as “a system of morality veiled in allegory and illustrated by symbols.”^[4]^[5] …”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freemasonry

FreeMasons New World Order Part 1/7

FreeMasons New World Order Part 2/7

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W6IW_KAchyA&feature=related

FreeMasons New World Order Part 3/7

FreeMasons New World Order Part 4/7

FreeMasons New World Order Part 5/7

FreeMasons New World Order Part 6/7

FreeMasons New World Order Part 7/7

Background Articles and Videos

World Economic Forum

“…The World Economic Forum (WEF) is a Geneva-based non-profit foundation best known for its annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland, which brings together top business leaders, international political leaders, selected intellectuals and journalists to discuss the most pressing issues facing the world, including health and the environment. Beside meetings, the WEF produces a series of research reports and engages its members in sector specific initiatives.^[1] WEF also organizes the “Annual Meeting of the New Champions” in China and a series of regional meetings throughout the year. In 2008 those regional meetings included meetings on Europe and Central Asia, East Asia, the Russia CEO Roundtable, Africa, the Middle East, and the World Economic Forum on Latin America. In 2008 it launched the “Summit on the Global Agenda” in Dubai.

The WEF was founded in 1971 by Klaus Martin Schwab, a German-born business professor at the University of Geneva.^[2] Originally named the European Management Forum, it changed its name to the World Economic Forum in 1987 and sought to broaden its vision further to include providing a platform for resolving international conflicts.

In the summer of 1971 Schwab invited 444 executives from Western European firms to the first European Management Symposium held in the Davos Congress Centre under the patronage of the European Commission and European industrial associations, where Schwab sought to introduce European firms to US management practices. He then founded the WEF as a non-profit organization based in Geneva and drew European business leaders to Davos for their annual meetings each January.^[3]

Schwab developed the “stakeholder” management approach which based corporate success on managers taking account of all interests: not merely shareholders, clients and customers, but employees and the communities within which the firm is situated, including governments.^[4] Events in 1973 including the collapse of the Bretton Woods fixed exchange rate mechanism and the Arab-Israeli War saw the annual meeting expand its focus from management to economic and social issues, and political leaders were invited for the first time to Davos in January 1974.^[5]

As the years went by, political leaders began to use Davos as a neutral platform to resolve their differences. The Davos Declaration was signed in 1988 by Greece and Turkey, helping them turn back from the brink of war. In 1992 South African President F. W. de Klerk met with Nelson Mandela and Chief Mangosuthu Buthelezi at the Annual Meeting, their first joint appearance outside South Africa. At the 1994 Annual Meeting, Israeli Foreign Minister Shimon Peres and PLO Chairman Yasser Arafat reached a draft agreement on Gaza and Jericho.^[6] In 2008 Bill Gates gave a keynote speech on Creative Capitalism, a form of capitalism that works both to generate profits and solve the world’s inequities, using market forces to better address the needs of the poor.^[7]^[8] …”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Economic_Forum

Background Articles and Videos

Carroll Quigley

http://www.carrollquigley.net/

Carroll Quigley

“…Quigley was born in Boston, and attended Harvard University, where he studied history and earned B.A, M.A., and Ph.D. degrees. He taught at Princeton University, and then at Harvard, and then at the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University from 1941 to 1976.^[1]

From 1941 until 1969, he taught a two-semester course at Georgetown on the development of civilizations. According to the obituary in the Washington Star, many alumni of Georgetown’s School of Foreign Service asserted that this was “the most influential course in their undergraduate careers”.^[2]

In addition to his academic work, Quigley served as a consultant to the U.S. Department of Defense, the U.S. Navy, the Smithsonian Institution, and the House Select Committee on Astronautics and Space Exploration in the 1950s.^[3] Quigley served as a book reviewer for the Washington Star and was a contributor and editorial board member of Current History.^[4] His work emphasized “inclusive diversity” as a value of Western Civilization long before diversity became commonplace, and he denounced Platonic doctrines as an especially pernicious deviation from this ideal, preferring the pluralism of Thomas Aquinas.^{[citation needed]} Quigley said of himself that he was a conservative defending the liberal tradition of the West. He was an early and fierce critic of the Vietnam War,^{[citation needed]} and he was against the activities of the military-industrial complex which he saw as the future downfall of the country.^{[citation needed]}

Quigley retired from Georgetown in June, 1976, and died the following year.^[5]

Influence on Bill Clinton

In his freshman year in the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown, future U.S. President Bill Clinton took Quigley’s course, receiving a ‘B’ as his final grade in both semesters.^[6]

Clinton named Quigley as an important influence on his aspirations and political philosophy in 1991, when launching his presidential campaign in a speech at Georgetown.^[7] He also mentioned Quigley again during his acceptance speech to the 1992 Democratic National Convention, as follows:

As a teenager, I heard John Kennedy’s summons to citizenship. And then, as a student at Georgetown, I heard that call clarified by a professor named Carroll Quigley, who said to us that America was the greatest Nation in history because our people had always believed in two things–that tomorrow can be better than today and that every one of us has a personal moral responsibility to make it so.^[8]

Quigley and secret societies

One distinctive feature of Quigley’s historical writings was his assertion that secret societies have played a significant role in recent world history. Although this topic was not the primary focus of most of Quigley’s works, his writing on this topic has made Quigley famous among many who believe in conspiracy theories.^[9] Quigley’s views are particularly notable because the majority of reputable academic historians profess skepticism about conspiracy theories.^[10]

Quigley’s claims about the Milner Group

In his book The Anglo-American Establishment: From Rhodes to Cliveden, written in 1949 but published posthumously in 1981, Quigley purports to trace the history of a secret society founded in 1891 by Cecil Rhodes and Alfred Milner. The society consisted of an inner circle (“The Society of the Elect”) and an outer circle (“The Association of Helpers”).^[11] The society as a whole does not have a fixed name:

This society has been known at various times as Milner’s Kindergarten, as the Round Table Group, as the Rhodes crowd, as The Times crowd, as the All Souls group, and as the Cliveden set. … I have chosen to call it the Milner group. Those persons who have used the other terms, or heard them used, have not generally been aware that all these various terms referred to the same Group. It is not easy for an outsider to write the history of a secret group of this kind, but, since no insider is going to do it, an outsider must attempt it. It should be done, for this Group is, as I shall show, one of the most important historical facts of the twentieth century.^[12]

Quigley assigns this group primary or exclusive credit for several historical events: the Jameson Raid, the Second Boer War, the founding of the Union of South Africa, the replacement of the British Empire with the Commonwealth of Nations, and a number of Britain’s foreign policy decisions in the twentieth century.^[13]

In 1966, Quigley published a one-volume history of the twentieth century entitled Tragedy and Hope. At several points in this book, the history of the Milner group is discussed. Moreover, Quigley states that he has recently been in direct contact with this organization, whose nature he contrasts to certain right-wing conspiracy theories:

This radical Right fairy tale, which is now an accepted folk myth in many groups in America, pictured the recent history of the United States, in regard to domestic reform and in foreign affairs, as a well-organized plot by extreme Left-wing elements…. This myth, like all fables, does in fact have a modicum of truth. There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international Anglophile network which operates, to some extent, in the way the Radical right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other group, and frequently does so. I know of the operation of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960’s, to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies… but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known.^[14]

According to Quigley, the leaders of this group were Cecil Rhodes and Alfred Milner from 1891 until Rhodes’ death in 1902, Milner alone until his own death in 1925, Lionel Curtis from 1925 to 1955, Robert H. (Baron) Brand from 1955 to 1963, and Adam D. Marris from 1963 until the time Quigley wrote his book. This organization also functioned through certain loosely affiliated “front groups”, including the Royal Institute of International Affairs, the Institute of Pacific Relations, and the Council on Foreign Relations. After 1963 the organization’s activities were “greatly reduced.”^[15]

In addition, other secret societies are briefly discussed in Tragedy and Hope, including a consortium of the leaders of the central banks of several countries, who formed the Bank for International Settlements with the intent to “create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole.”^[16]

May 2013
M	T	W	T	F	S	S
« Apr
		1	2	3	4	5
6	7	8	9	10	11	12
13	14	15	16	17	18	19
20	21	22	23	24	25	26
27	28	29	30	31

May 2013
M	T	W	T	F	S	S
« Apr
		1	2	3	4	5
6	7	8	9	10	11	12
13	14	15	16	17	18	19
20	21	22	23	24	25	26
27	28	29	30	31

History Lesson: Eisenhower Agriculture Sect. Sounds the Alarm Over Take Over of America 1 of 2

History Lesson: Eisenhower Agriculture Sect. Sounds the Alarm Over Take Over of America 2 of 2

Karl Rove vs. The Tea Party: Conservative Civil War

John Birch Society documentary from the 1960′s

G. Edward Griffin – The Collectivist Conspiracy

G. Edward Griffin The Dangerous Servant A Discourse on Government

The Creature From Jekyll Island (by G. Edward Griffin)

G. Edward Griffin on Glenn Beck

“The Federal Reserve Is a Cartel” – G. Edward Griffin

JBS (John Birch Society) Overview of America Part 1 (HQ)

Invisible Empire A New World Order Defined Full (Order it at Infowars.com)

Anonymous WORLD ANONYMOUS NOW

anonymous ITU and WCIT 3-15 december

Vint Cerf on the ITU

FRANCE 24 Tech 24: Who rules the Web? : ITU vs. ICANN

Possible Internet Take Over By The ITU (UN) [HD]

Internet should stay free and open

Operation WCIT – Keep OUR internet Free

Background Articles and Videos

World Conference on International Telecommunications (WCIT-12)

Related Posts On Pronk Palisades

G. Edward Griffin – The Collectivist Conspiracy

Background Articles and Videos

G. Edward Griffin on ‘Glen Beck’ Exposes Criminal Nature and Total Secrecy of Federal Reserve System

The 1% Are Afraid of Ron Paul 2012 Revolt -

NWO Corporate Minions (MSM Whores) Getting Desperate!

Mark Levin Interviews Jeffrey Lord On Ron Paul And His Supporters Being Neoliberal

Mark Levin, Ron Paul Hater, Put in His Place

American Spectator Dead Wrong on Ron Paul

Jack Hunter on FOX News 12-29-11

Gingrich Gone Wild – Might Vote For Obama

Jeffrey Lord Doesn’t Know The Founders or Ron Paul

Background Articles and Videos

Ron Paul and the Neoliberal Reeducation Campaign

John Birch Society – Overview of America – Part 1

John Birch Society – Overview of America – Part 2

John Birch Society – Overview of America – Part 3

John Birch Society – Overview of America – Part 4

Background Articles and Videos

Alex Jones welcomes John Birch Society President John McManus 1/5

Related Posts On Pronk Palisades

Robert Welch in 1974 reveals NWO

ConCongressman Dr Ron Paul WARNS United Nations = One World Tyranny / J.B.S. FIlm 1997 gressman

Pt.1 Ron Paul speaks at the John Birch Society 50th Anniversary 2008

Pt.2 Ron Paul speaks at the John Birch Society 50th Anniversary 2008

Pt.3 Ron Paul speaks at the John Birch Society 50th Anniversary 2008

Pt.4 Ron Paul speaks at the John Birch Society 50th Anniversary 2008

Related Posts On Pronk Palisades

Ne0-Con: Not New and Not Conservative

Republican In Name Only

Governor Rick Perry – Patriot or Villain?

The Dangers of the North American Union by Jerome Corsi – NAU SPP NWO NAFTA

The History of NAFTA and the Council on Foreign Relations

The North American Union REVEALED (Ron Paul 2008!)

Trans-Texas Corridor on NBC Nightly News 06/19/2007

Perry Proposes The Trans-Texas Corridor

Perry’s North American Highway

The Trans-Texas Corridor

Ron Paul on Lou Dobbs About NAU Super Highway

Glenn Beck Rips Perry’s TTC

NAFTA Superhighway

NAFTA Super Highway on CNN

Rick Perry Dodges TTC Question

Trans-Texas Corridor proof of Life

Richard Reeves: Trans Texas Corridor Back with a Vengeance – Alex Jones Tv 3/3

New World Order Bilderberg Group – Open Your Eyes and See The TRUTH

Who Is Bilderburg And What Are They Up To ?

Bilderberg – an introduction

The Alex Jones Show 1/3: Neo-Con Hierarchies Order Media Blitzkrieg Attack on Patriot Leaders

The Alex Jones Show 2/3: Neo-Con Hierarchies Order Media Blitzkrieg Attack on Patriot Leaders

The Alex Jones Show 3/3: Neo-Con Hierarchies Order Media Blitzkrieg Attack on Patriot Leaders

Alex Jones – Perry Targets Infowars Writer Via Blog as “Conspiracy Theorist” Working for Obama 1_3!

Alex Jones – Perry Targets Infowars Writer Via Blog as “Conspiracy Theorist” Working for Obama 2_3!

Alex Jones – Perry Targets Infowars Writer Via Blog as “Conspiracy Theorist” Working for Obama 3_3!

Ron Paul “Republicans Want A NeoCon Influence In The Tea Party Movement

Rick Perry, conservative or just another Rhino

Sarah Palin 9/11 Truther controversy explodes

George Carlin Doesn’t vote

George Carlin -”Who Really Controls America”

Ron Paul smeared by CNN’s Jeffrey Toobin about NAFTA highway