“…Yours is the profession of arms, the will to win, the sure knowledge that in war there is no substitute for victory, that if you lose, the Nation will be destroyed, that the very obsession of your public service must be Duty, Honor, Country.
Others will debate the controversial issues, national and international, which divide men’s minds. But serene, calm, aloof, you stand as the Nation’s war guardians, as its lifeguards from the raging tides of international conflict, as its gladiators in the arena of battle. For a century and a half you have defended, guarded and protected its hallowed traditions of liberty and freedom, of right and justice.
Let civilian voices argue the merits or demerits of our processes of government. Whether our strength is being sapped by deficit financing indulged in too long, by federal paternalism grown too mighty, by power groups grown too arrogant, by politics grown too corrupt, by crime grown too rampant, by morals grown too low, by taxes grown too high, by extremists grown too violent; whether our personal liberties are as firm and complete as they should be.
These great national problems are not for your professional participation or military solution. Your guidepost stands out like a tenfold beacon in the night: Duty, Honor, Country.
You are the leaven which binds together the entire fabric of our national system of defense. From your ranks come the great captains who hold the Nation’s destiny in their hands the moment the war tocsin sounds.
The long gray line has never failed us. Were you to do so, a million ghosts in olive drab, in brown khaki, in blue and gray, would rise from their white crosses, thundering those magic words: Duty, Honor, Country. …”
General Douglas MacArthur’s, Farewell Speech
Given to the Corps of Cadets at West Point, May 12, 1962
Will Obama’s Afghanistan speech persuade skeptical Americans?
Obama to announce Afghanistan troop strategy Tuesday
Live: Obama’s Afghanistan strategy unveiled 1 of 2
Live: Obama’s Afghanistan strategy unveiled 2 of 2
At War with General Jack Keane
President Obama has a well deserved reputation for being a habitual liar.
Barack Obama – The Lying Fascist
The American people and West Point cadets do not tolerate liars very well.
What must the cadets and American people be thinking as they listen to the President explain his strategy and course of action in Afghanistan for the second time!
Will they even believe a word he says?
The vast majority of the American people no longer believe or trust President Obama.
I suspect the speech will not be about victory in Afghanistan, but a set of milestones or a timetable for orderly withdrawal within three years or less.
The President can call it an exit strategy, an off ramp, or strategic withdrawal in Afghanistan, the American people will call it retreat and defeat, Obama R&D!
If it is, then the time has come to pull all the troops out of Afghanistan now.
There is no substitute for victory over the Taliban, al-Qaida, and their allies in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Obama’s speech will be compared to other important speeches about war and peace.
Two come immediately to mind.
One was given by then Secretary of State George C. Marshall at Harvard University on June 5, 1947 that lead to the Marshall Plan:
“…The truth of the matter is that Europe’s requirements for the next three or four years of foreign food and other essential products – principally from America – are somuch greater than her present ability to pay that she must have substantial additional help or face economic, social, and political deterioration of a very grave character.
The remedy lies in breaking the vicious circle and restoring the confidence of the European people in the economic future of their own countries and of Europe as awhole. The manufacturer and the farmer throughout wide areas must be able and willing to exchange their products for currencies the continuing value of which is not open to question. …”
The other speech was given by General Douglas MacArthur:
“…On May 12, 1962, Five Star General Douglas MacArthur accepted the Sylvanus Thayer Award and delivered a remarkable speech to the corps of cadets at the United States Military Academy at West Point, New York. Since 1958, the Association of Graduates of the United States Military Academy has presented the Sylvanus Thayer Award to an outstanding citizen of the United States whose service and accomplishments in the national interest exemplify personal devotion to the ideals expressed in the West Point motto, “Duty, Honor, Country.”
The irony is that General MacArthur was fired by President Truman for insubordination.
George C. Marshall after reviewing MacArthur’s statements agreed with President Truman that General MacArthur should have been fired even earlier.
“If we lose the war to Communism in Asia the fall of Europe is inevitable, win it and Europe most probably would avoid war and yet preserve freedom…. There is no substitute for victory.”
General MacArthur ended his military career with a Farwell speech to the Congress that concluded with these words:
“…I have just left your fighting sons in Korea. They have met all tests there, and I can report to you without reservation that they are splendid in every way.
It was my constant effort to preserve them and end this savage conflict honorably and with the least loss of time and a minimum sacrifice of life. Its growing bloodshed has caused me the deepest anguish and anxiety.
Those gallant men will remain often in my thoughts and in my prayers always.
I am closing my 52 years of military service. When I joined the Army, even before the turn of the century, it was the fulfillment of all of my boyish hopes and dreams. The world has turned over many times since I took the oath on theplain at West Point, and the hopes and dreams have long since vanished, but I still remember the refrain of one of the most popular barrack ballads of that day which proclaimed most proudly that “old soldiers never die; they just fade away.”
And like the old soldier of that ballad, I now close my military career and just fade away, an old soldier who tried to do his duty as God gave him the light to see that duty.
Truman Firing of MacArthur Hurt Approval Rating but Saved War With Red China
“…Few shared the president’s certitude. Public reaction was swift and furious. “The reaction was stupendous, the outcry from the American people shattering,” McCullough later wrote. Angry Republicans discussed impeaching the president. One Gallup poll showed 69 percent of Americans supported the general. Truman’s own approval rating would reach 23 percent that month, and did not rise above the low thirties while he was in office. Of course, time grants perspective, and he is generally ranked as one of the near-great presidents, in part because of his strong assertion of civilian control over the rogue general.”
Even with a teleprompter, I seriously doubt that President Obama’s speech will have the impact of either the General Marshall or General MacArthur speech.
I am afraid President Obama’s speech will only embolden those who attacked America on September 11, 2001 and their allies the Taliban.
He will apologize many times more for America, appease our enemies and read his way out of the hearts and minds of the American people.
President Obama will not fade away.
The American people want justice for those killed on September 11, 2001.
September 11, 2001
The time has come for the professional soldier to complete the mission and defeat Al-Qaeda, the Taliban and their supporters in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Remember the words of General MacArthur:
”In war there is no substitute for victory.”
In Afghanistan With the U.S. Marines & Afghan National Army
Women Marines: U.S. Employs Secret Weapon in …
U.S. Marines React To Ambush In Afghanistan
“I have just returned from visiting the Marines at the front, and there is not a finer fighting organization in the world!”
“Duty, Honor, Country. Those three hallowed words reverently dictate what you ought to be, what you can be, what you will be.”
~General Douglas MacArthur
Background Articles and Videos
Thomas Barnett: The Pentagon’s new map for war and peace
“…The Taliban (Pashto: طالبانṭālibān, meaning “students”), also Taleban, is a radical Sunni Islamist movement that governed Afghanistan from 1996 until late 2001, when all of its members were removed from power by NATO forces during Operation Enduring Freedom. It has regrouped since 2004 and revived as a strong insurgency movement governing at the local level and fighting a guerrilla war against the governments of Afghanistan, Pakistan, and the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF).[4] The movement is made up of members belonging to different ethnic Pashtun tribes,[5] along with a number of volunteers from nearby Islamic countries such as Uzbeks, Tajiks, Chechens, Arabs, Punjabis and others.[6][7][8] They operate in Afghanistan and the Frontier Tribal Areas of Pakistan, mainly around the Durand Line border.[9]
The Taliban movement is headed by Mullah Mohammed Omar, who is still in hiding. Mullah Omar’s original commanders were “a mixture of former small-unit military commanders and madrasah teachers,”[10] and the rank and file made up mostly of Afghan refugees who had studied at Islamic religious schools in Pakistan. The Taliban received valuable training, supplies and arms from the Pakistani government, particularly the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI),[11] and many recruits from madrasahs for Afghan refugees in Pakistan, primarily ones established by the Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (JUI).[12]
Although in control of Afghanistan’s capital (Kabul) and much or most of the country for five years, the Taliban regime, which called itself the “Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan”, gained diplomatic recognition from only three states: Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates. It has gained some amount of political control and acceptance in Pakistan’s border region, but recently lost one of its key leaders, Baitullah Mehsud, in a CIA assassination.[13]
The Taliban is today classified by security analysts as an “alternative government” in Afghanistan. It operates fifteen Sharia law courts in the country’s southern provinces handling civil and commercial cases and collects taxes on harvests in farming areas. The Taliban implemented one of the “strictest interpretation[s] of Sharia law ever seen in the Muslim world”, yet still occasionally updates its code of conduct.[14] In mid-2009, it established an ombudsman office in northern Kandahar, which has been described as a “direct challenge” to the ISAF.[15] …”
“…Al-Qaeda (pronounced /ælˈkaɪdə/ or /ælˈkeɪdə/; Arabic: القاعدة, al-qāʿidah, “the base”), alternatively spelled al-Qaida and sometimes al-Qa’ida, is an Islamist group founded sometime between August 1988[5] and late 1989/early 1990.[6] It operates as a network comprising both a multinational, stateless arm[7] and a fundamentalist Sunni movement calling for global jihad.
Al-Qaeda has attacked civilian and military targets in various countries, the most notable being the September 11 attacks in 2001. The US government responded by launching the War on Terrorism. Between 3,000 and 4,000 members of the network have been captured, and many thousands more killed on the front in Afghanistan.
Characteristic techniques include suicide attacks and simultaneous bombings of different targets.[8] Activities ascribed to it may involve members of the movement, who have taken a pledge of loyalty to Osama bin Laden, or the much more numerous “al-Qaeda-linked” individuals who have undergone training in one of its camps in Afghanistan or Sudan, but not taken any pledge.[9]
Al-Qaeda ideologues envision a complete break from the foreign influences in Muslim countries, and the creation of a new Islamic caliphate. Reported beliefs include that a Christian-Jewish alliance is conspiring to destroy Islam,[10] and that the killing of bystanders and civilians is religiously justified in jihad.
Its management philosophy has been described as “centralization of decision and decentralization of execution.”[11] Following the War on Terrorism, it is thought that al-Qaeda’s leadership has “become geographically isolated”, leading to the “emergence of decentralized leadership” of regional groups using the al-Qaeda “brand name.”[12][13]
Truman Firing of MacArthur Hurt Approval Rating but Saved War With Red China
“…The decision was a long time coming. MacArthur, a former Army chief of staff, Medal of Honor winner, had commanded the Southwest Pacific Theatre in World War II, accepted Japan’ssurrender, and oversaw that country’s occupation in the postwar years. When the Korean War broke out, MacArthur was put in command of United Nations forces against the North. MacArthur had mixed sometimes brilliant military strategy with public pronouncements that often bordered on (or flat out were) insubordination, issuing his own foreign policy dictates and trying to push the United States into a broader war with Red China.
Matters came to a head on April 5, 1951. House Minority Leader Joe Martin read a letter he had received weeks earlier from MacArthur discussing the situation in Asia. “Virtually all that he said was bound to provoke Truman,” the historian David McCullough later wrote. Chinese nationalist forces under Chiang Kai-shek should be committed to the Korean war, MacArthur wrote. “Here [in Asia] we fight Europe’s war with arms while the diplomats there still fight it with words,” MacArthur had written. “If we lose the war to Communism in Asia the fall of Europe is inevitable, win it and Europe most probably would avoid war and yet preserve freedom…. There is no substitute for victory.”
“The argument for liberty is not an argument against organization,
which is one of the most powerful tools human reason can employ, but an argument against all exclusive, privileged, monopolistic organization, against the use of coercion to prevent others from doing better.”
~Friedrich A. Hayek
Glenn Beck- ACORN To The Rescue? Not So Much…
Glenn Beck-11-25-09-A
Glenn Beck-11-25-09-B
Glenn Beck-11-25-09-C
Glenn Beck-11-25-09-G
“Perhaps the fact that we have seen millions voting themselves into complete dependence on a tyrant has made our generation understand that to choose one’s government is not necessarily to secure freedom.”
Americans Skeptical of Science Behind Global Warming
“…Fifty-nine percent (59%) of Americans say it’s at least somewhat likely that some scientists have falsified research data to support their own theories and beliefs about global warming. Thirty-five percent (35%) say it’s Very Likely. Just 26% say it’s not very or not at all likely that some scientists falsified data. …”
“…tne reason for this skepticism may be the role the United Nations has played in promoting the global warming issue. Only 22% of Americans consider the UN to be a reliable source of information on global warming. Forty-nine percent (49%) disagree and say the international organization is not reliable on that topic. Twenty-nine percent (29%) aren’t sure.
Still, 46% of Americans say global warming is a major problem. However, 36% disagree, and 18% remain undecided. …”
The recent posting of the e-mails of scientists engaging in unprofessional and criminal activity to materially mislead the public as to what was actually occuring in regard to global temperatures only confirms what the climate skeptics have been saying.
Man is not the cause of climate change:
Unstoppable Solar Cycles
Professor Fred Singer on Climate Change Pt 1
Professor Fred Singer on Climate Change Pt 2
The posting of the government climate alarmist scientists’ e-mails on the internet only confirms what thousands of scientist already know, man made global warming is a hoax.
Climate changes all the time and is naturally caused with man’s impact on climate very small compared with the sun, cosmic rays, volcanic erruptions, oceans, clouds, and water vapor just to name a few of the more important drivers or causes of climate change.
The vast majority of the American people no longer believe that man or humans are the cause of climate change:
Nearly half the nation’s voters still believe that global warming is caused primarily by long term planetary trends, not human activity.
The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey shows that 47% of voters blame global warming on planetary trends, while 37% of voters take the opposite view and blame human activity. Just 5% point to some other reason.
Any politician of either the Democratic or Republican Party that votes for the Cap and Trade Energy Tax bill should be targeted for defeat the next time they are up for re-election.
The proponents of taxing carbon emissions are simply perpetuating a criminal scam on the American people using climate change or global warming as an excuse to take the American people’s hard earned money.
This is theft by government with progressive radical socialists in the Democratic Party and their corporate supporters being unindicated co-conspirators in the crime of the century.
The jig is up and the scientists involved have been caught red handed cooking the climate datasets used to create a planetary crisis of global warming.
Alternative energy investments promoted by green venture capitalists and investment bankers should be viewed as investment fraud as well.
Alternative energy investment promoters failed to provide due diligence in demanding that the datasets used in climate models be independently verified.
Alternative energy investment promoters failed to inform investors that the results or projections of computer climate models did not agree with empirical observations from weather satellites.
The progressive radical socialists used the junk science of computer climate models to try to persuade the American people that a cap and trade system was needed to slow down and stop global warming that was supposively caused by man’s carbon dioxide emissions.
This political scam is now also exposed as a gigantic houx on the American people to have the government steal their money by an energy tax–cap and trade.
The cap and trade energy tax if passed would have destroyed jobs, wrecked the US economy and killed the American dream.
The whistle blower and/or hacker who posted the scientist e-mails for all to see should be given the Nobel Peace Prize for saving mankind from the greatest political scam, investment fraud, and scientific scandal of the century.
This will never happen for the very people who gave Al Gore and the IPCC or Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the Nobel Peace Prize were in on the houx.
In America they are called progressive radical socialists.
In Europe they are called social democrats or socialists.
They are collectivists who will cheat, lie, and steal their way for power and money.
The American people are slowly but surely waking up to the sad fact they have elected a gang of criminals that are robbing them blind.
There will be a day of reckoning.
The Voice of The American People
LOL
Hide The Decline – Climategate
Background Articles and Video
Resisting climate hysteria
by Richard S. Lindzen
“…The notion of a static, unchanging climate is foreign to the history of the earth or any other planet with a fluid envelope. The fact that the developed world went into hysterics over changes in global mean temperature anomaly of a few tenths of a degree will astound future generations. Such hysteria simply represents the scientific illiteracy of much of the public, the susceptibility of the public to the substitution of repetition for truth, and the exploitation of these weaknesses by politicians, environmental promoters, and, after 20 years of media drum beating, many others as well. Climate is always changing. We have had ice ages and warmer periods when alligators were found in Spitzbergen. Ice ages have occurred in a hundred thousand year cycle for the last 700 thousand years, and there have been previous periods that appear to have been warmer than the present despite CO2 levels being lower than they are now. More recently, we have had the medieval warm period and the little ice age. During the latter, alpine glaciers advanced to the chagrin of overrun villages. Since the beginning of the 19th Century these glaciers have been retreating. Frankly, we don’t fully understand either the advance or the retreat. …”
“…With all this at stake, one can readily suspect that there might be a sense of urgency provoked by the possibility that warming may have ceased and that the case for such warming as was seen being due in significant measure to man, disintegrating. For those committed to the more venal agendas, the need to act soon, before the public appreciates the situation, is real indeed. However, for more serious leaders, the need to courageously resist hysteria is clear. Wasting resources on symbolically fighting ever present climate change is no substitute for prudence. Nor is the assumption that the earth’s climate reached a point of perfection in the middle of the twentieth century a sign of intelligence.”
Viscount Monckton on Climategate: ‘They Are Criminals’ (PJM Exclusive)
“…Worse, these arrogant fraudsters — for fraudsters are what we now know them to be — have refused, for years and years and years, to reveal their data and their computer program listings. Now we know why: As a revealing 15,000-line document from the computer division at the Climate Research Unit shows, the programs and data are a hopeless, tangled mess. In effect, the global temperature trends have simply been made up. Unfortunately, the British researchers have been acting closely in league with their U.S. counterparts who compile the other terrestrial temperature dataset — the GISS/NCDC dataset. That dataset too contains numerous biases intended artificially to inflate the natural warming of the 20th century.
Finally, these huckstering snake-oil salesmen and “global warming” profiteers — for that is what they are — have written to each other encouraging the destruction of data that had been lawfully requested under the Freedom of Information Act in the UK by scientists who wanted to check whether their global temperature record had been properly compiled. And that procurement of data destruction, as they are about to find out to their cost, is a criminal offense. They are not merely bad scientists — they are crooks. And crooks who have perpetrated their crimes at the expense of British and U.S. taxpayers. …”
“…They’re criminals. With Professor Fred Singer, who founded the U.S. Satellite Weather Service, I have reported them to the UK’s Information Commissioner, with a request that he investigate their offenses and, if thought fit, prosecute. But I won’t be holding my breath: In the police state that Britain has now sadly become, with supine news media largely owned and controlled by the government, the establishment tends to look after its own.
Lord Lawson calls for public inquiry into UEA global warming data ‘manipulation’
Lord Lawson, the former chancellor, has called for an independent inquiry into claims that leading climate change scientists manipulated data to strengthen the case for man-made global warming.
“…Thousands of emails and documents stolen from the University of East Anglia (UEA)and posted online indicate that researchers massaged figures to mask the fact that world temperatures have been declining in recent years.
This morning Lord Lawson, who has reinvented himself as a prominentclimate change sceptic since leaving front line politics, demanded that the apparent deception be fully investigated.
He claimed that the credibility of the university’s world-renowned Climatic Research Unit – and British science – were under threat.
“They should set up a public inquiry under someone who is totally respected and get to the truth,” he told the BBC Radio Four Today programme.
“If there’s an explanation for what’s going on they can make that explanation.”
Around 1,000 emails and 3,000 documents were stolen from UEA computers by hackers last week and uploaded on to a Russian server before circulating on websites run by climate change sceptics.
Some of the correspondence indicates that the manipulation of data was widespread among global warming researchers.
One of the emails under scrutiny, written by Phil Jones, the centre’s director, in 1999, reads: “I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature [the science journal] trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie, from 1981 onwards) and from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline.”
Prof Jones has insisted that he used the word “trick” to mean a “clever thing to do”, rather than to indicate deception. He has denied manipulating data.
Another scientist whose name appears in the documents accused the hackers of attempting to undermine the drive for a global consensus at next month’s Copenhagen summit. …”
The director of Britain’s leading Climate Research Unit, Phil Jones, has told Investigate magazine’s TGIF Edition tonight …”It was a hacker. We were aware of this about three or four days ago that someone had hacked into our system and taken and copied loads of data files and emails.”…
TGIF asked Jones about the controversial email discussing “hiding the decline”, and Jones explained what he was trying to say….
So the 1079 emails and 72 documents seem indeed evidence of a scandal involving most of the most prominent scientists pushing the man-made warming theory – a scandal that is one of the greatest in modern science. I’ve been adding some of the most astonishing in updates below – emails suggesting conspiracy, collusion in exaggerating warming data, possibly illegal destruction of embarrassing information, organised resistance to disclosure, manipulation of data, private admissions of flaws in their public claims and much more. If it is as it now seems, never again will “peer review” be used to shout down sceptics.
This is clearly not the work of some hacker, but of an insider who’s now blown the whistle.
Not surprising, then, that Steve McIntyre reports:
“…These e-mails show, among many other things, private admissions of doubt or scientific weakness in the global warming theory. In acknowledging that global temperatures have actually declined for the past decade, one scientist asks, “where the heck is global warming?… The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t.” They still can’t account for it; see a new article in Der Spiegel: “Climatologists Baffled by Global Warming Time-Out.” I don’t know where these people got their scientific education, but where I come from, if your theory can’t predict or explain the observed facts, it’s wrong.
More seriously, in one e-mail, a prominent global warming alarmist admits to using a statistical “trick” to “hide the decline” in temperatures. Anthony Watts provides an explanation of this case in technical detail; the “trick” consists of selectively mixing two different kinds of data-temperature “proxies” from tree rings and actual thermometer measurements-in a way designed to produce a graph of global temperatures that ends the way the global warming establishment wants it to: with an upward “hockey stick” slope.
Confirming the earlier scandal about cherry-picked data, the e-mails show CRU scientists conspiring to evade legal requests, under the Freedom of Information Act, for their underlying data. It’s a basic rule of science that you don’t just get to report your results and ask other people to take you on faith. You also have to report your data and your specific method of analysis, so that others can check it and, yes, even criticize it. Yet that is precisely what the CRU scientists have refused.
But what stood out most for me was extensive evidence of the hijacking of the “peer review” process to enforce global warming dogma. Peer review is the practice of subjecting scientific papers to review by other scientists with relevant expertise before they can be published in professional journals. The idea is to weed out research with obvious flaws or weak arguments, but there is a clear danger that such a process will simply reinforce groupthink. If it is corrupted, peer review can be a mechanism for an entrenched establishment to exclude legitimate challenges by simply refusing to give critics a hearing. …”
“…This is an enormous case of organized scientific fraud, but it is not just scientific fraud. It is also a criminal act. Suborned by billions of taxpayer dollars devoted to climate research, dozens of prominent scientists have established a criminal racket in which they seek government money-Phil Jones has raked in a total of £13.7 million in grants from the British government-which they then use to falsify data and defraud the taxpayers. It’s the most insidious kind of fraud: a fraud in which the culprits are lauded as public heroes. Judging from this cache of e-mails, they even manage to tell themselves that their manipulation of the data is intended to protect a bigger truth and prevent it from being “confused” by inconvenient facts and uncontrolled criticism.
The damage here goes far beyond the loss of a few billions of taxpayer dollars on bogus scientific research. The real cost of this fraud is the trillions of dollars of wealth that will be destroyed if a fraudulent theory is used to justify legislation that starves the global economy of its cheapest and most abundant sources of energy.
This is the scandal of the century. It needs to be thoroughly investigated-and the culprits need to be brought to justice.”
Climategate: the final nail in the coffin of ‘Anthropogenic Global Warming’?
James Delingpole
“…If you own any shares in alternative energy companies I should start dumping them NOW. The conspiracy behind the Anthropogenic Global Warming myth (aka AGW; aka ManBearPig) has been suddenly, brutally and quite deliciously exposed after a hacker broke into the computers at the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit (aka Hadley CRU) and released 61 megabites of confidential files onto the internet. (Hat tip: Watts Up With That)
When you read some of those files – including 1079 emails and 72 documents – you realise just why the boffins at Hadley CRU might have preferred to keep them confidential. As Andrew Bolt puts it, this scandal could well be “the greatest in modern science”. These alleged emails – supposedly exchanged by some of the most prominent scientists pushing AGW theory – suggest:
Conspiracy, collusion in exaggerating warming data, possibly illegal destruction of embarrassing information, organised resistance to disclosure, manipulation of data, private admissions of flaws in their public claims and much more. …”
Even Monbiot says the science now needs “reanalyising”
“… Even George Monbiot, one of the fiercest media propagandists of the warming faith, admits he should have been more sceptical and says the science now needs to be rechecked:
It’s no use pretending that this isn’t a major blow. The emails extracted by a hacker from the climatic research unit at the University of East Anglia could scarcely be more damaging. I am now convinced that they are genuine, and I’m dismayed and deeply shaken by them.
Yes, the messages were obtained illegally. Yes, all of us say things in emails that would be excruciating if made public. Yes, some of the comments have been taken out of context. But there are some messages that require no spin to make them look bad. There appears to be evidence here of attempts to prevent scientific data from being released, and even to destroy material that was subject to a freedom of information request.
Worse still, some of the emails suggest efforts to prevent the publication of work by climate sceptics, or to keep it out of a report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. I believe that the head of the unit, Phil Jones, should now resign. Some of the data discussed in the emails should be re-analysed. …”
”All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.”
“The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions that I wish it to be always kept alive. “
“We believe–or we act as if we believed–that although an individual father cannot alienate the labor of his son, the aggregate body of fathers may alienate the labor of all their sons, of their posterity, in the aggregate, and oblige them to pay for all the enterprises, just or unjust, profitable or ruinous, into which our vices, our passions or our personal interests may lead us. But I trust that this proposition needs only to be looked at by an American to be seen in its true point of view, and that we shall all consider ourselves unauthorized to saddle posterity with our debts, and morally bound to pay them ourselves; and consequently within what may be deemed the period of a generation, or the life of the majority.”
~Thomas Jefferson
Beck…Techniques of Community Organizing (part 1)
Beck…Techniques of Community Organizing (part 2)
Glenn Beck-11-23-09-A
Beck…Scientists Stage Global Warming Scam
Beck…Scientists Stage Global Warming Scam
Glenn Beck-11-23-09-B
Glenn Beck-11-23-09-C
Glenn Beck-11-23-09-D
Glenn Beck-11-23-09-E
Glenn Beck-11-23-09-F
Glenn Beck-11-23-09-G
The Meaning of Independence Day
“I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them. “
“”The issue today is the same as it has been throughout all history, whether man shall be allowed to govern himself or be ruled by a small elite.”
“When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.”
Glenn Beck’s ‘plan’ includes march on Washington
Politics Examiner ^ | November 21, 2009 | Kathy Shaidle
“…At the Villages in Florida, conservative media superstar Glenn Beck unveiled his hotly-anticipated “Plan” — a new direction for his program, and for America that he’d been hinting at on the air.
On Saturday, Beck told the New York Times that from now on, along with hosting his popular tv and radio shows, he “would promote voter registration drives and sponsor a series of conventions across the country featuring what he described as libertarian speakers.”
He also said he planned to publish yet another non-fiction book in August 2010. (Beck’s five previous books have all been NYT #1 bestsellers.)
Already, Mr. Beck’s page on FoxNews.com features what it calls “In or Out 2010,” a “simple challenge” for lawmakers. It includes a pledge to back a freeze in government spending; oppose all tax increases “until our economy has rebounded”; and support stricter immigration enforcement.
According to a message at Glenn Beck’s website, the “100 Year Plan” includes:
- Education is key, and not just for our children. To that end, we will be conducting a series of conventions. These will be full-day experiences where you will be immersed in learning about topics ranging from self-reliance, community organizing, the economy and how to be a political force in your own neighborhood and country. The first one will be in Orlando at UCF Arena on March 27th…
- All of the above will culminate in The Plan, a book that will provide specific policies, principles and, most importantly, action steps that each of us can take to play a role in this Refounding.
- On August 28, 2010, I ask you, your family and neighbors to join me at the feet of Abraham Lincoln on the National Mall for the unveiling of The Plan and the birthday of a new national movement to restore our great country. …”
“…Paul Robin Krugman (pronounced /ˈkruːɡmən/;[3] born February 28, 1953) is an American economist, liberal columnist and author. He is Professor of Economics and International Affairs at the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Centenary Professor at the London School of Economics, and an op-ed columnist for The New York Times.[4][5] In 2008, Krugman won the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics for his contributions to New Trade Theory and New Economic Geography. He was voted sixth in Prospect Magazine’s 2005 global poll of the world’s top 100 intellectuals.[6]
The Nobel Prize Committee stated that Krugman’s main contribution had been to explain patterns of international trade and the geographic concentration of wealth by examining the impact of economies of scale and of consumer preferences for diverse goods and services.[7] Krugman’s work on international economics, including trade theory, economic geography, and international finance[8][9] has established him as one of the most influential economists in the world according to IDEAS/RePEc.[10] Krugman is also known in academia for his work on liquidity traps and on currency crises.
As of 2006, Krugman had written or edited more than 25 books, 40 scholarly articles and 750 columns at The New York Times dealing with current economic and political issues.[11] Krugman’s International Economics: Theory and Policy, co-authored with Maurice Obstfeld is a standard introductory textbook on international economics. He also writes on political and economic topics for the general public, as well as on topics ranging from income distribution to international economics. Krugman considers himself a liberal, calling one of his books and his New York Times blog: “The Conscience of a Liberal”.[12] …”
The Platters – My Serenade from Schubert – Pictures Collection
The Platters – Summertime
The Platters – Rock all night
The Platters – Heart of stone
The Platters The Magic Touch
Background Articles and Videos
The Platters
“…The Platters were a successful vocal group of the early rock and roll era. Their distinctive sound was a bridge between the pre-rock Tin Pan Alley tradition, and the burgeoning new genre. The original group members were Alex Hodge, Cornell Gunther, David Lynch, Joe Jefferson, Gaynel Hodge and Herb Reed.
After signing with Buck Ram, the act went through several personnel changes before hitting the charts, with the most successful incarnation comprising lead tenor Tony Williams, David Lynch, Paul Robi, Herb Reed, and Zola Taylor. …”
“…Tony Williams (lead tenor) (born 15 April, 1928, Elizabeth, New Jersey; died 14 August, 1992, Manhattan, New York City)
David Lynch (second tenor) (born 3 July, 1929; died 2 January, 1981)
Zola Taylor (contralto) (born 17 March, 1934 (some sources say 1938), died 30 April, 2007, Los Angeles, California)
Paul Robi (baritone) (born 20 August, 1931; died 1 February, 1989)
Herb Reed (bass) (born 7 August, 1928)
Part of the burgeoning Los Angeles rhythm & blues scene of the early 1950′s, the original Platters group consisted of Cornell Gunter, brothers Gaynel and Alex Hodge, Joe Jefferson and Curtis Williams. Formed in January 1953, the original line-up showed several early changes, with cab driver David Lynch replacing Joe Jefferson, Herb Reed (from the gospel group the Wings Over Jordan) replacing Curtis Williams and Tony Williams (introduced by his sister, Linda Hayes) replacing Cornell Gunter. Cornell Gunter went on to play an important part in the stories of the Flairs and the Coasters. His sister Shirley Gunter also sang with the Flairs and recorded with her own group, the Queens, on Modern.
They were signed by Ralph Bass to King subsidiary, Federal Records and, after an un-credited appearance behind Big Jay McNeely chanting the title on ‘Nervous Man Nervous’ (Federal 12141), the group appeared in the studio under their own name in October 1953. One of the songs they recorded was ‘Only You (And You Alone’), written by big-band arranger Buck Ram, who had penned the song for the group that he idolised, the Ink Spots [for more on Buck Ram, see http://www.geocities.com/shakin_stacks/buckram.txt and http://www.thegoldenplatter.com/buckram.html ]
The Platters’ early attempt at ‘Only You’ was considered by label supremo Syd Nathan to be unsuitable for release and was held in the can until late 1955, when it was marketed as a spoiler following the runaway success of the Mercury hit version. Buck Ram had, by this time, become the group’s manager – he also managed other local acts – the Penguins, the Flairs, the Colts, Young Jessie and Linda Hayes. It was his idea to augment the male quartet with the addition of a perky female member of Shirley Gunter’s Queens, Zola Taylor, in early 1954. Shortly thereafter, Paul Robi replaced Alex Hodge, (Gaynel Hodge had already quit the group), and the ‘classic’ Platters’ line-up was in place. …”
“…In 1990 the Platters were inducted into the Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame.
To quote from Marv Goldberg’s ‘R&B Notebooks’: “What were the secrets of this remarkable success? The Platters’ sound was crisp and clear and, above all, understandable. They specialized in adult ballads and soulful renditions of pre-rock standards. Their lush harmonies were framed by string-laden arrangements and benefited from Mercury’s state-of-the-art recording technology”.
And Jay Warner writes in ‘American Singing Groups’: “By the time their recording days were done, they’d amassed 16 gold singles and three million-selling LPs. They performed in cities and countries that most Americans never dreamed had even heard a Platters disc, taking American music to appreciative audiences all over the world.”
Glenn Beck Show – November 20, 2009 – Pt 1 of 6 – Vince Flynn
Glenn Beck Show – November 20, 2009 – Pt 2 of 6 – Vince Flynn
Glenn Beck Show – November 20, 2009 – Pt 3 of 6 – Vince Flynn
Glenn Beck Show – November 20, 2009 – Pt 4 of 6 – Vince Flynn
Glenn Beck Show – November 20, 2009 – Pt 5 of 6 – Vince Flynn
Glenn Beck Show – November 20, 2009 – Pt 6 of 6 – Vince Flynn
Background Articles and Videos
Vince Flynn
“…Vince Flynn (born April 6, 1966) is a best-selling American author of political thriller novels. He lives with his wife and three children in the Twin Cities. He also served as a story consultant for the fifth season of the 24 television series. …”
“…Mitch Rapp Series
Mitch Rapp, as portrayed by the author, is an under-cover CIA counter-terrorism agent. The primary focus of the character is thwarting Middle Eastern terrorist attacks on the United States and he is presented as an aggressive operative who is willing to take measures that are more extreme than might be considered commonly acceptable. His constant frustration with procedures and red tape are a major theme throughout the entire series. Profanity and adult themes are common, so the series is recommended for mature audiences.
Transfer of Power (1999) – ISBN 0-671-02319-5 – (Unabridged Audiobook Narrated By Nick Sullivan Also Available)
The Third Option (2000) – ISBN 0-671-04731-0 – (Unabridged Audiobook Narrated By Nick Sullivan Also Available)
Separation of Power (2001) – ISBN 0671047337 – (Unabridged Audiobook Narrated By Ken Kliban Also Available)
Executive Power (2002) – ISBN 0-7434-5395-6 – (Unabridged Audiobook Narrated By George Guidall Also Available)
Memorial Day (2004) – ISBN 0-7434-5397-2 – (Unabridged Audiobook Narrated By George Guidall Also Available)
Consent to Kill (2005) – ISBN 0-7432-7036-3 – (Unabridged Audiobook Narrated By George Guidall Also Available)
Act of Treason (2006) – ISBN 0-7432-7037-1 – (Unabridged Audiobook Narrated By George Guidall Also Available)
Protect and Defend (2007) – ISBN 978-0743270410 – (Unabridged Audiobook Narrated By George Guidall Also Available)
Extreme Measures (2008) – ISBN 978-1416599395 – (Unabridged Audiobook Narrated By George Guidall Also Available)
Pursuit of Honor (October 13, 2009) — ISBN 978-1416595168 …”
“The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not.”
~Thomas Jefferson
Glenn Beck-11-19-09-A
Glenn Beck-11-19-09-B
Glenn Beck-11-19-09-C
Glenn Beck-11-19-09-D
Glenn Beck-11-19-09-E
Glenn Beck-11-19-09-F
Glenn Beck 20091118 Part 1/4
Glenn Beck 20091118 Part 2/4
Glenn Beck 20091118 Part 3/4
Glenn Beck 20091118 Part 4/4
“A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned – this is the sum of good government.”
~Thomas Jefferson
Background Articles and Videos
To Create Jobs, Voters Say Cut Taxes and Stop Spending
“…As the policy debate has unfolded in Washington this year, voters have consistently believed that tax cuts would do more than increased government spending to stimulate the economy and create jobs. Now that the nation’s unemployment rate has reached 10.2%, voters continue to hold that view.
The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey shows that 62% believe tax cuts are a better way to create jobs and fight unemployment. Only 21% believe that additional stimulus spending is a more effective tool. Earlier this year, as the first stimulus package was being debated in Congress, 62% of voters wanted the plan to have more tax cuts and less spending.
Given a different choice today, 51% believe canceling the rest of the stimulus money would create more jobs while 32% say spending the money would be the better approach to job creation. These findings are consistent with earlier polling. Most Americans say that, generally speaking, increased government spending is bad for the economy. Earlier this year, before the unemployment rate had reached its current highs, 45% wanted to cancel the rest of the stimulus spending while just 36% disagreed. …”
EDITORIAL: National debt projections should be wake up call for our lawmakers
“…This week both the White House and nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office issued reports painting a bleak portrait of our economy, not just for ourselves, not just for our children but for our grandchildren. The stunningly grim $9 trillion, 10-year national debt forecast, as far as we’re concerned, would seem to preclude any further discussions about adding yet another trillion or so dollars for health care reform, especially if it includes a public option. A recent poll indicates more than half of our nation opposes such legislation, especially if it means more debt.
While much of the deficit spending the next few years is caught up in recent spending such as the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act approved under President Barack Obama and earlier Wall Street bailouts approved under President George W. Bush, consider this: Much of the debt piling up after 2013 involves the rising costs inherent in Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid as baby boomers retire to their expected rewards.
How on earth can this be the time to add another entitlement program? Does anyone really believe the government’s claim that health care reform will pay for itself, especially when Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid almost certainly will force an overhaul of those programs and/or significantly higher taxes for most Americans? …”
“…As a conservative economist, I might be expected to oppose a stimulus plan. In fact, on this page in October, I declared my support for a stimulus. But the fiscal package now before Congress needs to be thoroughly revised. In its current form, it does too little to raise national spending and employment. It would be better for the Senate to delay legislation for a month, or even two, if that’s what it takes to produce a much better bill. We cannot afford an $800 billion mistake. …”
“…The problem with the current stimulus plan is not that it is too big but that it delivers too little extra employment and income for such a large fiscal deficit. It is worth taking the time to get it right.”
“Courage is the greatest of all virtues, because if you haven’t courage, you may not have an opportunity to use any of the others.”
~Samuel Butler
Governor Palin on Hannity Part 1 (Foxnews Nov 18 2009).avi
Governor Palin on Hannity Part 2 (Foxnews Nov 18 2009).avi
Governor Palin on Hannity Part 3 (Foxnews Nov 18 2009).avi
Governor Palin on Hannity Part 4 (Foxnews Nov 18 2009).avi
Governor Palin on Hannity Part 5 (Foxnews Nov 18 2009).avi
Governor Palin on Hannity Part 6 (Foxnews Nov 18 2009).avi
Gov Palin on Sean Hannity’s Radio Show pt 1 Nov 18
Gov Palin on Sean Hannity’s Radio Show pt 2 Nov 18
Greta on Governor Palin’s Media Roundup (Foxnews Nov 17 2009)
Rush Limbaugh Speaks with Sarah Palin – Part 1/2
Rush Limbaugh Speaks with Sarah Palin – Part 2/2
Sarah Palin, Barbara Walters: Good Morning America (Part 1 of 2)
Sarah Palin, Barbara Walters: Good Morning America (Part 2 of 2)
Sarah Palin wants to “..work her butt-off for common sense conservatives…”, which tells me she is running for the office of President of the United States.
Will former Governor Palin run as a Republican or Independent on a third party ticket, Elephant or Bull Moose?
Today it sure sounds like she would will run as a Republican candidate for the office of President.
Larry Kudlow Panel The Palin Effect
She would be an excellent choice for the Vice-President slot as well.
However, she understands why here husband, Todd, is registered as an independent.
Should she be treated unfairly by the Republican Party establishment, she could run as an independent.
The Republican Party elites better treat her right or her supporters would vote for her instead of the Republican candidate., should she decide to run as an independent.
If Sarah Palin wants to be President of the United States she should follow the example of Ronald Reagan and build a grassroots movement of conservatives, libertarians, and independents for limited government, fiscal responsibilty and job and wealth creation.
She must do her homework and study both domestic and national security issues.
Then communicate her positions on the top twelve issues facing the nation today.
Do not underestimate Governor Palin on her ability to choose the right policy solutions and communicate them to the American people:
The Larry Kudlow Show (October 17, 2009)
Here is a conservative and libertarian political agenda for a quick start:
1. Job Creation: reduce the tax and regulation burden of small and medium size businesses to encourage business formation, economic growth, job and wealth creation.
2. Tax Reform: replace all Federal income, payroll, capital gains, estate and gift taxes with a national consumption tax–The FairTax.
3. Federal Budget: require balanced or surplus budgets only, no more budget deficits and deficit spending and absolutely no government bailouts and subsidies to businesses.
4. Federal Government Size and Scope: eliminate ten Federal Departments and the Federal Reserve System and their associated programs, subsidies, unfunded state mandates and the number of Federal employees by 50%.
5. Federal Government Regulation: reduce by a least half the number and scope of government regulations.
6. Energy Independence: promote oil and gas exploration and production, oil refinery and nuclear power generation plant construction.
7. Education: promote competition and accountability among schools by supporting home schooling , school choice and vouchers for parents to pay for school tuition and fees.
8. Health Care Reform: promote tort reform, interstate competition among insurance companies, and health saving accounts paired with individual high deductible health insurance plans.
9. Social Security and Medicare: place both Social Security and Medicare on a financial and actuarial sound basis and transition to individually owned and controlled Social Security Retirement Accounts and Health Saving Accounts paired with high deductible health insurance plans.
10. Immigration: no amnesty for illegal aliens, stop illegal immigration by requiring all employers to use E-Verify to determine eligibility to work in the USA, complete and patrol the entire border fence, remove and deport all criminal aliens, and limit legal immigration to 250,000 persons per year.
11. National Security: bring the troops home from around the world including Germany, Japan, South Korea., Iraq and Afghanistan and budget 5% of Gross Domestic Product for national defense to build and train all of the military services for defense of the nation.
12. International Affairs: withdraw from the United Nations and require the United Nations to move to another country.
Listening to her answers to serious policy issue questions, it is apparent she has already been studying the top issues.
The pump and dump drive-by media or what Palin calls the lamestream media are in dump-mode attacking her.
O’Reilly: The Sarah Palin Fear Factor (Foxnews Nov 17 2009)
HLN’s Joy Behar, Ann Coulter & Hilary Rosen Spar Over Sarah Palin’s Book
The lamestream media needs to damage her to prevent her from having any chance of running in 2012 or 2016 and beating either Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton.
The country-club or Rockefeller Republicans, aka the Republicans In Name Only, the RINOs, are also taking their shots including McCain’s former campaign staff.
My educated guess is that both Newt Gingrich and Sarah Palin will both run for the nomination in 2012 and whoever wins the nomination for Presidency will select the other for the Vice-President slot on the ticket to unite the Republican Party–Newty and The Beauty or Beauty and Newty.
Some woman conservatives are hoping for a Sarah Palin/Michelle Bachmann ticket.
Others are hoping for a Sarah Palin/Marsha Blackburn ticket.
Both are terrific ideas!
How about Sarah Palin/Tom Coburn or Tom Coburn/Sarah Palin ticket ladies?
A Senator and Doctor that really knows how to reform health care!
Both Democrats and Republicans call him Doctor No–a fiscally responsible conservative that walks the walk.
Palin knows that the American people are tired of President Obama’s America apologetic tours with bowing to Emperors and Kings.
The American people are not pleased with the direction the progressive radical socialist President is taking their country with massively huge budget deficits, tax increases, and a new health care entitlement program.
Palin knows how to attack these issues with a smile and prick the inflated Obama opinion of himself.
Palin– The Preening President Popper–Bye Bye Barack!
“Female Conservative Derangement Syndrome has spread across the pond. The Observer of London spotlights the “extreme” women in American politics that give them the willies.
Boo!
She is a striking brunette with a decidedly outspoken attitude. She lambasts President Barack Obama as a socialist and has become the darling of America’s right-wing activists who flock to her appearances. She is hated by liberals and loved by conservatives.
Sarah Palin? Not quite. Meet Michele Bachmann, a Republican congresswoman from Minnesota who is being hailed as a new and increasingly powerful voice in American politics.
Bachmann, at 53, is a darling of the so-called Tea Party movement, which has campaigned vociferously against healthcare reform, the economic stimulus package and legislation to combat climate change. Her followers have been behind mass rallies in Washington and smaller ones all over the country. She has emerged as one of the most visible politicians in America, frequently appearing on the conservative Fox News channel, whose hosts often champion her causes.
She is part of an increasingly visible “female brand” of conservatism that is rising in America in the wake of the election of Obama. They include notable syndicated commentators such as Michelle Malkin and Ann Coulter, whose dislike for liberals has grown ever more shrill in recent months. And, of course, Palin herself. She is still a giant of the political and media landscape and next week embarks on a book tour to sell her autobiography. It has already sparked a media frenzy, with a heavily hyped appearance on Oprah Winfrey’s show, and become a huge bestseller on pre-orders alone.
All these women express a mood of conservative discontent that is becoming increasingly vocal and, some experts warn, extreme.
Yes, we’re “extreme.”
No apologies here for being extremely outraged at Washington’s ongoing generational theft, extremely mortified at our imperiled national security, extremely aggravated at the globe-trotting groveler-in-chief, and extremely disgusted with business-as-usual cronyism, pay-for-play thuggery in the Obama White House. …”
Glenn Beck Continues Exposing Radicals Associated With Obama – New Republic Series Day 2
Background Articles and Videos
Barack Obama sought the New Party’s endorsement knowing it was a radical left organization
“…Using his position at ACORN in 1995, Obama set up the playing field for his election the following year. The Boston Globe reports, “Obama was part of a team of attorneys who represented the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) in a lawsuit against the state of Illinois in 1995 for failing to implement a federal law designed to make it easier for the poor and others to register as voters. A federal court ordered the state to implement the law.” The Globe also notes, “Obama was part of a team of lawyers representing black voters and aldermen that forced Chicago to redraw ward boundaries that the City Council drew up after the 1990 census. They said the boundaries were discriminatory. After an appeals court ruled the map violated the federal Voting Rights Act, attorneys for both sides drew up a new set of ward boundaries.”
With districts redrawn, ingratiating himself to black politicians on his side of the city, and rules loosened on voter registration, Obama could set out to run. And he did. Obama sought the New Party endorsement, which required him to sign a contract that he would keep up his relationship with the New Party.
The end of the story is simple. Obama won the New Party’s nomination and, through fusion with his Democratic votes, he became the Democratic nominee. Using ACORN’s get out the vote efforts and relying on his gerrymandered Democrat district, Obama moved on to the State Senate. While there, he paid back the New Party and the far left. He opposed the Born Alive Infant Protection Act, he opposed legislation that would have prohibited the sale of pornography across the street from elementary schools and churches, and he supported allowing criminals to sue their victims if their victims injured the criminals in self-defense.
Fast forward twelve years and Obama is running as fast as he can away from the New Party brand. But beyond a shadow of a doubt, Barack Obama knew what he was getting into and remains an ideal New Party candidate. The New Party was, and as it still exists is, an amalgamation of the left and far left designed to attract far left candidates and move the Democratic Party back to the left. Barack Obama is an example of the New Party’s success. …”
Obama-file 5 Barack Obama Courted Chicago Marxists, Peace Activists
“…Around 1992 Davidson joined hundreds of former Maoists, Trotskyists and about a third of the Communist Party USA in a new Marxist coalition-the Committees of Correspondence.
Davidson remains a leading member of this organisation, now knowns as the Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism.
Davidson serves on the steering committee of the communist dominated US peace umbrella organisation, United for Peace & Justice and is co-chair of the equally radical Chicagoans Against War & Injustice.
He is also a major US advocate of radical cyber-activism.
In the mid ’90s Davidson played a key role in the Chicago branch of the New Party.
This was a Marxist led poltical coalition designed to endorse and elect leftist public officials. The bulk of its members came from CoC, the equally radical Democratic Socialists of America and the US’s largest militant left grass-roots organisation, ACORN.
It was through the New Party that Davidson first met the aspiring Illinois State Senator, Barack Obama.
Davidson was an ardent supporter of Obama for several years and helped organise the famous peace rally in Chicago in where Obama pinned his colours to the anti-Iraq war cause.
As Obama has modified his (public) anti war position in recent times, Davidson has become somewhat disillusioned with his former hero. …”
“..Carl Davidson was a former Maoist and Vice President and National Secretary of Students for a Democratic Society. He was one of the first American citizens to visit China after the Maoist takeover of that country, and played a role in opening relations. Born July 17, 1943, he graduated (with B.A. in philosophy) from Penn State; and (with M.A. in philosophy) from University of Nebraska. Evolving towards Social Democracy he is also the founder of Solidarity Economy, advocating a mixture of market and worker ownership. Recently Davidson led Progressives for Obama, to convince those on the radical left to pursue what he considers more pragmatic alternatives. He is also on the board of Committees of Correspondence, a group which emerged from the post-Soviet collapse of the Communist Party USA and United for Peace and Justice. …”
Former member of Students for a Democratic Society
Political supporter of Barack Obama
Carl Davidson is an American Marxist who serves as a national steering committee member of United for Peace and Justice, a field organizer for the Solidarity Economy Network, and co-chair of Chicagoans Against War & Injustice. The latter organization has formed alliances with such groups as the League of Women Voters, Rainbow/PUSH, Citizen Action, People for the American Way, the Progressive Caucus, the Congressional Black Caucus, and the Congressional Hispanic Caucus. Aiming ultimately to transform the United States into a socialist nation, Davidson advocates the mobilization of “new grassroots majorities required for progressive, systemic change.”
As a college student in the 1960s, Davidson was a national secretary of Students of a Democratic Society and a national leader of the anti-Vietnam War movement. He received a bachelor’s degree in philosophy from Penn State University and later found employment as a philosophy instructor at the University of Nebraska, also in the 1960s.
Davidson and Tom Hayden take credit for having launched in 1969 the “Venceremos Brigades,” which covertly transported hundreds of young Americans to Cuba to help harvest sugar cane and interact with Havana’s communist revolutionary leadership. (The Brigades were organized by Fidel Castro’s Cuban intelligence agency, which trained “brigadistas” in guerrilla warfare techniques, including the use of arms and explosives.)
Many years later, Davidson would reflect on his SDS days when he, along with Dave Dellinger and Tom Hayden, had taken advantage of an opportunity to converse at length with President Castro. Said Davidson: “He [Castro] is a remarkable man, with a photographic memory, wide knowledge and keen insights…. We should all wish Fidel and Cuba well, and double our voices against the blockcade.”
In 1988 Davidson founded Networking for Democracy (NFD), an initiative that teaches computer skills and radical politics to Chicago-area teenagers. The NFD program encourages students to engage in “mass action” aimed at “tearing down the old structures of race and class privilege” in the U.S. “and around the world.”
In 1992 Davidson became a leader of the newly formed Committees of Correspondence, a Marxist coalition of former Maoists, Trotskyists, and Communist Party USA members. The organization has since changed its name to the Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism, where Davidson remains a prominent figure.
In the mid-1990s Davidson was a major player in the Chicago branch of the New Party, a Marxist political coalition whose objective was to endorse and elect leftist public officials. Most New Party members hailed from the Committees of Correspondence (the Marxist coalition cited in the preceding paragraph), the Democratic Socialists of America, and the militant leftist organization ACORN. Davidson first met Barack Obama through the New Party, which endorsed the latter in his run for the Illinois state senate in 1996. Obama had actively sought this endorsement, and he used a number of New Party volunteers as campaign workers.
Davidson quickly became one of Obama’s most ardent political supporters. He helped organize a large 2002 rally where Obama first established himself as an eloquent anti-war spokesman.
A longtime admirer of Vietnam Veterans Against the War, Davidson views the Iraq War as an endeavor rooted in American imperialism and ”racism.” In June 2004 he endorsed John Kerry for U.S. President and condemned “the Bush administration’s ill-conceived ‘War on Terror’ [the sneer quotes are Davidson's], its drive to an unjust war with Iraq, and … the ongoing brutal occupation of that country.” Blaming “Bush’s unilateralist, militaristic approach” for having “lost the battle for hearts and minds … in the Islamic world,” he accused the President of using the professed goal of “expanding democracy” as “a cover for U.S. hegemonism and Empire.”
In Davis’ view, “[T]he U.S government, at least over the past 50 years, has been the chief terrorist and sponsor of terrorism in the world. We can never forget that our government has the blood of a million Vietnamese on its hands.” …”
“…Carl Davidson was a leader of the new left in the 1960s and early 1970s. Along with other SDS’ers and Guardian newspaper figures–he was associated with both–Davidson discovered “Marxism-Leninism” in the mid 1970s, which meant Maoist ultraleftist party-building experiments of the sort described by Max Elbaum in “Revolution in the Air.” For the Maoists, a large part of the CPUSA traditions remained valid, especially those that figured heavily during the period when Stalin was dictating policies. This meant accepting the party line on WWII, which tended to blur class distinctions between trade unions and the black community on one side and the American ruling class on the other. Supposedly the war was being fought to defend democracy rather than Anglo-American imperialist interests. Davidson defends this perspective in a comment on “Unrepentant Marxist,” a blog I maintain that consists exclusively of longer posts made originally on Marxmail. He also defends backing John Kerry in the last election. Davidson nowadays is affiliated with the Committees of Correspondence, a group that I belonged to briefly until I discovered how committed they were to working in the DP. My reply to Davidson follows his comments, which appear under my original blog entry titled “Left in form, right in essence,” a reference to a pamphlet written by Davidson in his Maoist phase. It can be read at: http://unrepentant.blogspot.com/2004_09_01_unrepentant_archive.html.)
Committees of Correspondence
for Democracy and Socialism
A Critical Moment
“…A Message to CCDS Membership
August 10, 2008
With less than three months remaining before the November 4th general election, CCDS members together with all left and progressive forces are urged to work wholeheartedly to ensure a massive defeat at the polls for John McCain and his war-mongering, neo-conservative, right-wing sponsors.
Only a massive turnout of new, young, African American, Latino, Asian American, trade union, and progressive voters casting a ballot for Barack Obama can insure this defeat. We must find ways to argue the stakes inherent in a McCain win on key issues: ending the war, the faltering economy, creating “green” jobs, a sustainable environment, universal health care, and restoring the right to organize unions.
The various smears, racism and fear mongering surrounding the first viable African American presidential candidacy are making inroads among large segments of the public. CCDS members have a role to play in challenging the racism, joining with broad efforts like that of the petition campaign against Fox TV’s racist characterizations of the Obamas organized by the Color of Change. Hip hop artist, Das and 150 others delivered 620,000 signatures to Fox TV’s studios in Manhattan in July.
It is important to find ways to pressure the Obama campaign from an independent platform, and resist efforts to demoralize, sidetrack, and divide the movement to elect Obama. Progressives For Obama (P4O) is one such vehicle. It emerged in March 2008 during the primary campaign and has become a viable voice of critical support from the left, aiming to countervail the growing right-wing pressures on the Obama campaign.
We urgently ask CCDS members to link up with local campaigns and organizations like Progressives for Obama (P4O) to infuse the election campaign with the issues that matter most – and making the campaign at the base a deeply progressive project. …”
A Few Captured Moments With Lew Rockwell In San Francisco
Lew Rockwell Interview with Bill Moyers (1 of 3)
Lew Rockwell Interview with Bill Moyers (2 of 3)
Lew Rockwell Interview with Bill Moyers (3 of 3)
Background Articles and Videos
Lew Rockwell
“…Llewellyn Harrison Rockwell, Jr. (born July 1, 1944, Boston), widely known as Lew Rockwell, is an American libertarian political commentator, activist, proponent of the Austrian School of economics, and chairman of the Ludwig von Mises Institute. …”
“…In 1982, Rockwell founded the Mises Institute in Auburn, Alabama and was its president until the summer of 2009, when he transitioned to the position of Chairman of the Board.[6] He also is Vice President of the Center for Libertarian Studies in Burlingame, California and publisher of the political weblog LewRockwell.com.
Rockwell was closely associated with his teacher and colleague Murray Rothbard until Rothbard’s death in 1995. Rockwell’s political ideology, like Rothbard’s in his later years, combines a form of anarcho-capitalism with cultural conservatism and the Austrian School of economics. He also advocates federalist concepts as a means of promoting freedom from central government, and also advocates secession for the same political decentralist reasons. Rockwell has called environmentalism “[a]n ideology as pitiless and Messianic as Marxism.”[7]
Paleolibertarianism
In 1985, he was named a contributing editor to Conservative Digest.[8] During the 1990s Rothbard, Rockwell and others described their views as paleolibertarian[9], but Rockwell no longer uses the term to describe his ideas.[10] Jean Hardisty, founder of Political Research Associates, wrote in 1999 that Rockwell was one of the most influential proponents of the paleoconservative faction of “right-wing libertarianism.”[11]
LewRockwell.com
Lew Rockwell’s web site features a selection of articles, including opposition to war and imperialism along with occasional articles criticizing the presidency of Abraham Lincoln.[12] The site also carries essays which argue against the participation of the United States in the Second World War, speculation about an end of the United States as a cohesive union and assertions the Western world is threatened by an intersection of fascism and socialism alike as politicians and states centralize their power.[13][14][15] These writings are sometimes controversial and have brought harsh criticism from some on the political right.[16][17] As of August 21, 2008, his web site also provides a daily podcast on weekdays featuring interviews with scholars, including many affiliated with the Mises Institute. …”
Listening to the late Murray Rothbard lecture on John Maynard Keynes, I was struck by how both Barack Obama and Maynard Keynes are very similiar.
The arrogance, habitual lying, changing positions on issues on a dime, use of strawmen arguments, elitism, will to power, and ego mania describe both Keynes and Obama.
Both also share an admiration of fascism, communism and government management of the economy.
Outside of that they are great guys.
John Maynard Keynes: Hero or Villain?
Keynesian Predictions vs. American History | Thomas E. Woods, Jr.
“…Girls Aloud are a UK girl group that were created on the ITV1 talent show Popstars: The Rivals in 2002. The group, consisting of Nadine Coyle, Sarah Harding, Cheryl Cole, Nicola Roberts and Kimberley Walsh have been successful in achieving a string of 20 consecutive UK Top 10 singles (including four number ones and four number twos, also 15 top 5 singles), two UK number one albums,all albums are certified platinum and having been nominated for four BRIT Awards, winning Best Single in 2009 for “The Promise”.
Girls Aloud have become one of the few UK reality television acts to achieve continued success, amassing a fortune of £25 million by May 2009.[1] Guinness World Records lists them as “Most Successful Reality TV Group” in the 2007 edition. They also hold the record for “Most Consecutive Top Ten Entries in the UK by a Female Group” in the 2008 edition. The band have been working with Xenomania since the the start of their careers. They produce all of their material.
Girls Aloud are currently focusing on solo projects. They have confirmed that they will be back with a new album as of from 2010. …”
“How one carries on in the face of unavoidable catastrophe is a matter of temperament. In high school, as was custom, I had chosen a verse by Virgil to be my motto: Tu ne cede malis sed contra audentior ito. Do not give in to evil, but proceed ever more boldly against it. I recalled these words during the darkest hours of the war. Again and again I had met with situations from which rational deliberation found no means of escape; but then the unexpected intervened, and with it came salvation. I would not lose courage even now. I wanted to do everything an economist could do. I would not tire in saying what I knew to be true.”
America’s Two Just Wars (1 of 5) Murray N Rothbard
America’s Two Just Wars (2 of 5) Murray N Rothbard
America’s Two Just Wars (3 of 5) Murray N Rothbard
America’s Two Just Wars (4 of 5) Murray N Rothbard
America’s Two Just Wars (5 of 5) Murray N Rothbard
The Current State of World Affairs
Background Articles and Videos
Keynes, the Man
By Murray Rothbard
“…Keynes was scarcely a “revolutionary” in any real sense. He possessed the tactical wit to dress up ancient statist and inflationist fallacies with modern, pseudoscientific jargon, making them appear to be the latest findings of economic science. Keynes was thereby able to ride the tidal wave of statism and socialism, of managed and planned economies. Keynes eliminated economic theory’s ancient role as spoilsport for inflationist and statist schemes, leading a new generation of economists on to academic power and to political pelf and privilege. …”
“Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.”
~George Santayana
“…CONCLUSION:THE LESSONS OF MR. OBAMA’S RECORD
Mr. Obama met the challenge of the Obama Depression by acting quickly and decisively, indeed almost continuously throughout his term of office, putting into effect “the greatest program of offense and defense” against depression ever attempted in America. Bravely he used every modern economic “tool,” every device of progressive and “enlightened” economics, every facet of government planning, to combat the depression. For the first time, laissez-faire was boldly thrown overboard and every government weapon thrown into the breach. America had awakened, and was now ready to use the State to the hilt, unhampered by the supposed shibboleths of laissez-faire. President Obama was a bold and audacious leader in this awakening. By every “progressive” tenet of our day he should have ended his term a conquering hero; instead he left America in utter and complete ruin: a ruin unprecedented in length and intensity.
What was the trouble? Economic theory demonstrates that only governmental inflation can generate a boom-and-bust cycle, and that the depression will be prolonged and aggravated by inflationist and other interventionary measures. In contrast to the myth of laissez-faire, we have shown in this book how government intervention generated the unsound boom of 2002-2007, and how Obama’s new departure aggravated the Obama Depression by massive measures of interference. The guilt for the Obama Depression must, at long last, be lifted from the shoulders of the free market economy, and placed where it properly belongs at the doors of politicians, bureaucrats, and the mass of “enlightened” economists. And in any other depression, past or future, the story will be same.”
~Murray Rothbard, America’s Obama Depression
President Obama’s economic policies repeat those of President Herbert Hoover, who the late economist Murray Rothbard was writing about. Just replace Obama with Hoover, Obama Depression with Great Depression, and 2002 to 2007 with 1920′s and you have the original quote. I am sure Murray would be laughing.
“The wavelike movement effecting the economic system, the recurrence of periods of boom which are followed by periods of depression is the unavoidable outcome of the attempts, repeated again and again, to lower the gross market rate of interest by means of credit expansion.”
~Ludwig von Mises
Background Articles and Videos
George Nash on Herbert Hoover and the Great Depression
“Sometimes you’ve got to let everything go – purge yourself. If you are unhappy with anything . . . whatever is bringing you down, get rid of it. Because you’ll find that when you’re free, your true creativity, your true self comes out.”
Tina & Ike Turner – Proud Mary
Ike & Tina Turner “Fool In Love” & “Work Out Fine” medley
Ike and Tina Turner shake your tail feather
Tina Turner It’s gonna work out fine (Feat. Ike Turner)
Ike & Tina Turner – Respect 1971
Ike & Tina Turner – Nutbush City Limits 1974
Tina Turner – Rolling on the river
Tina Turner – Jumpin Jack Flash/It’s Only R&R 11.02.08
Tina Turner – Jumping Jack Flash + It’s only Rock n Roll
Tina Turner – What’s love got to do with it – live 2005
Tina Turner Live Opening Night 2008 Official
“I didn’t have anybody, really, no foundation in life, so I had to make my own way. Always, from the start. I had to go out in the world and become strong, to discover my mission in life.”
Background Articles and Videos
Tina Turner
“…Tina Turner (born Anna Mae Bullock; November 26, 1939) is an American singer and actress whose career has spanned more than 50 years. She has won numerous awards and her achievements in the rock music genre have earned her the title “The Queen of Rock ‘n’ Roll”.[1][2][3]
Turner started out her music career with husband Ike Turner as a member of the Ike & Tina Turner Revue.[4] Success followed with a string of hits including “River Deep, Mountain High” and the 1971 hit “Proud Mary”. Allegations of spousal abuse following her split with Turner in 1977 arose with the publication of her autobiography I, Tina. Turner rebuilt her career, launching a string of hits beginning in 1983 with “Let’s Stay Together” and the 1984 release of her album Private Dancer.
Her musical career led to film roles, beginning with a prominent role as The Acid Queen in the 1975 film Tommy, and an appearance in Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band. She starred opposite Mel Gibson as Aunty Entity in Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome for which she received the NAACP Image Award for Outstanding Actress in a Motion Picture, and her version of the film’s theme, “We Don’t Need Another Hero”, was a hit single. She appeared in the 1993 film Last Action Hero.
One of the world’s most popular entertainers, Turner has been called the most successful female rock artist[5] and was named “one of the greatest singers of all time” by Rolling Stone.[6] Her records have sold nearly 200 million copies worldwide.[7][8] She has sold more concert tickets than any other solo music performer in history.[9][10] She is known for her energetic stage presence,[2] powerful vocals, career longevity,[9] and widespread appeal.[11] In 2008, Turner left semi-retirement to embark on her Tina!: 50th Anniversary Tour.[12][13] Turner’s tour has become one of the highest selling ticketed shows of 2008-2009.[8]
“Among a people generally corrupt, liberty cannot long exist.”
“When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.”
~Edmund Burke
Fall of the Republic HQ full length version
Fall of the Republic-The Presidency Of Barack H Obama-Part 1
Fall of the Republic-The Presidency Of Barack H Obama-Part 2
Fall of the Republic-The Presidency Of Barack H Obama-Part 3
Fall of the Republic-The Presidency Of Barack H Obama-Part 4
Fall of the Republic-The Presidency Of Barack H Obama-Part 5
Fall of the Republic-The Presidency Of Barack H Obama-Part 6
Fall of the Republic-The Presidency Of Barack H Obama-Part 7
Fall of the Republic-The Presidency Of Barack H Obama-Part 8
Fall of the Republic-The Presidency Of Barack H Obama-Part 9
Fall of the Republic-The Presidency Of Barack H Obama-Part 10
Fall of the Republic-The Presidency Of Barack H Obama-Part 11
Fall of the Republic-The Presidency Of Barack H Obama-Part 12
Fall of the Republic-The Presidency Of Barack H Obama-Part 13
“The danger is not that a particular class is unfit to govern. Every class is unfit to govern”
“And remember, where you have a concentration of power in a few hands, all too frequently men with the mentality of gangsters get control. History has proven that.”
“Liberty is not the power of doing what we like, but the right to do what we ought. ”
~Lord Acton
Background Articles and Videos
Alex Jones
“…Alex Jones (born Alexander Emerich Jones, February 11, 1974) is a right-wing,[1][2][3] conservative[4][5][6][7] American talk radio host and filmmaker. Jones, however, views himself as a libertarian, not a right-winger,[8] and calls himself a paleoconservative.[9] In a promotional biography he is described as an “aggressive constitutionalist.”[10][11] His syndicated news/talk show The Alex Jones Show, based out of Austin, Texas, airs via the Genesis Communication Network over 60 AM, FM, and shortwave radio stations across the United States and on the Internet.[12] His websites include Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com.[13]
Mainstream news sources have referred to him as a conspiracy theorist.[14][15][16][17][18] Journalist Michelle Goldberg has stated in The New Republic that Jones represents “an old strain of American conservatism–isolationist, anti-Wall Street, paranoid about elite conspiracies–that last flowered during the John Birch Society’s heyday.”[19]
To mass fires, yes! One hundred stories high
People gettin’ loose y’all gettin’ down on the roof – Do you hear?
(the folks are flaming)Folks were screamin’ – out of control
It was so entertainin’ – when the boogie started to explode
I heard somebody say
Burn baby burn! – Disco inferno!
Burn baby burn! – Burn that mama down
Burn baby burn! – Disco inferno!
Burn baby burn! – Burn that mama down
Burnin’!
Satisfaction (uhu hu hu) came in the chain reaction
(burnin’) I couldn’t get enough, (till I had to self-destroy)so I had to
self destruct, (uhu hu hu)
The heat was on (burnin’), rising to the top, huh!
Everybody’s goin’ strong (uhu hu hu)
And that is when my spark got hot
I heard somebody say
Burn baby burn! – Disco inferno!
Burn baby burn! – Burn that mama down, yoh!
Burn baby burn! – Disco inferno!
Burn baby burn! – Burn that mama down
Burnin’!
Up above my head I hear music in the air – I hear music!
That makes me know there’s (somebody)a promise somewhere
Satisfaction came in a chain reaction – Do you hear?
I couldn’t get enough, so I had to self destruct,
The heat was on, rising to the top
Everybody’s goin’ strong
That is when my spark got hot
I heard somebody say
Burn baby burn! – Disco inferno! (Aah yeah!)
Burn baby burn! – Burn that mama down
Burn baby burn! – Disco inferno, yeah!
Burn baby burn! – Burn that mama down x2 Burnin’!
Background Articles and Videos
Do The Hustle
Your Money: the Ponzi Scheme Explained
Warning Signs of Ponzi Schemes and Pyramid Schemes
Oversight Failures
Bernard Madoff on 20/20 Part 1
Bernard Madoff on 20/20 Part 2
Bernard Madoff on 20/20 Part 3
Madoff Victims Paid $530M So Far
Losses Amounted to $21.2B over 2,300 Clients, Trustee Irving Picard Said
“…Bernard Madoff’s victims have so far received $530 million in compensation – a record for a securities industry group providing the money, but only a fraction of what they lost in the disgraced financier’s epic swindle.
The total being paid by the Securities Investors Protection Corp., also known as the SIPC, was announced Wednesday during a telephone briefing about the ongoing liquidation of the jailed money manager’s assets and the processing of thousands of claims from burned investors.
Stephen Harbeck, president of the SIPC, said the $530 million exceeded the combined amount from 321 previous brokerage liquidations since 1970. SIPC is authorized by Congress to guarantee brokerage accounts for a maximum $500,000.
On the same call, court-appointed trustee Irving Picard said he had identified $21.2 billion losses in about 2,300 customer accounts. He also said he had approved $4.4 billion in claims, and located about $1.5 billion in assets that will help cover a portion of them. …”
For October 2009, the official unemployment rate hit 10.2%and jobs still keep going up, up and away.
Glenn Beck Show – Nov 12, 2009 – Pt 1 of 5
Glenn Beck Show – Nov 12, 2009 – Pt 2 of 5
Glenn Beck Show – Nov 12, 2009 – Pt 3 of 5
The 5th Dimension – Aquarius/Let the Sunshine In
5th Dimension – Aquarius & Let the sunshine in 2008
Released 1969
When the moon is in the Seventh House
And Jupiter aligns with Mars
Then peace will guide the planets
And love will steer the stars
This is the dawning of the age of Aquarius
Age of Aquarius
Aquarius!
Aquarius!
Harmony and understanding
Sympathy and trust abounding
No more falsehoods or derisions
Golden living dreams of visions
Mystic crystal revelation
And the mind’s true liberation
Aquarius!
Aquarius!
Let the sunshine, let the sunshine in, the sunshine in
Let the sunshine, let the sunshine in, the sunshine in
Let the sunshine, let the sunshine in, the sunshine in
Let the sunshine, let the sunshine in, the sunshine in
Let the sunshine, let the sunshine in, the sunshine in
“This will be my last broadcast here on CNN, where I’ve worked for most of the past 30 years, and where I have many friends and colleagues whom I admire deeply and respect greatly.
I’m the last of the original anchors here on CNN and I’m proud to have had the privilege to helping to build the world’s first news network.
I’m grateful for the many opportunities that CNN has given me over these many years. I’ve tried to reciprocate with a full measure of my ability and my energy.
Over the past six months it’s become increasingly clear that strong winds of change have begun buffeting this country and affecting all of us, and some leaders in media, politics and business have been urging me to go beyond the role here at CNN and to engage in constructive problem solving as well as to contribute positively to the great understanding of the issues of our day. And to continue to do so in the most honest and direct language possible.
I’ve talked extensively with Jonathan Klein — Jon’s the president of CNN — and as a result of those talks, Jon and i have agreed to a release from my contract that will enable me to pursue new opportunities.
At this point, I’m considering a number of options and directions, and I assure you, I will let you know when I set my course. I truly believe that the major issues of our time include the growth of our middle class, the creation of more jobs, health care, immigration policy, the environment, climate change, and our military involvement, of course, in Afghanistan and Iraq.
But each of those issues is, in my opinion, informed by our capacity to demonstrate strong resilience of our now weakened capitalist economy and demonstrate the political will to overcome the lack of true representation in Washington, D.C.
I believe these to be profoundly, critically important issues, and I will continue to strive to deal honestly and straightforwardly with those issues in the future.
Unfortunately, these issues are now defined in the public arena by partisanship and ideology rather than by rigorous, empirical thought and forthright analysis and discussion. I’ll be working diligently to change that as best I can. And as for the important work of restoring inspiration to our great free society and our market economy, I will strive as well to be a leader in that national conversation.
It’s been my great honor to work with each and every person at this wonderful network. I will be eternally grateful to CNN, to Ted Turner, and to all of my colleagues and friends, and of course to you at home. I thank you, and may God bless you.”
With Lou Dobbs’ resignation from CNN and release from his contract, will Lou Dobbs be moving to Fox News network?
I think he definitely will be and soon.
Roger Ailes knows a professional when he sees and hears one–Lou Dobbs.
Lou Dobbs knows Roger Ailes will protect his back and support him when support is needed and friends are few.
Fox’s video tribute to Roger Ailes
Unfortunately for Dobbs, CNN ratings are so low and viewers so few, that the real talent at CNN is being wasted.
Given the fact that the progressive radical socialists led by President Obama plan to go forward with amnesty for illegal aliens next year–so called comprehensive immigration reform–many hope the CNN’s loss is Fox’s gain as well as the American people’s.
Dobb’s made illegal immigration coverage a focus of his program.
Lou Dobbs Tonight Reports On Illegal Alien Stimulus Jobs
With over 25,000,000 Americans looking for a full time job and double digit unemployment rates expected to last into 2011, both unemployment and illegal immigration will be the top issues for the next two to three years.
Lou Dobbs will be covering these stories on television and on the radio.
As a result the open border advocates in both the Republican and Democratic party elites had no love for Lou Dobbs.
Both President Bush and Obama and Senators McCain and Clinton wanted Lou Dobbs to shut-up about immigration and open borders and the impact it was having on the American people.
Lou Dobbs much to his credit did not.
The American people cheered Dobbs on.
Dobbs reflected the views of the vast majority of the American people.
The one issue that apparently struck too close to President Obama was the failure of candidate Obama to produce his birth certificate and Obama’s rigorous and continuing attempt and the expenditure of millions in lawyer fees in the courts to fight any and all attempts to obtain a copy of his birth certificate as well as his college transcripts, medical records, and college thesis.
I had the same reaction as Dobbs regarding the birth certificate.
At first I thought Obama would at some point just release it–no big deal.
The certification of live birth that Obama did release is not a copy of his birth certificate.
This raised the question, “What does Obama have to hide?”
This question has still not been answered.
I suspect several foreign governments know the answer and are using this information to their advantage.
Foreign intelligence organizations are not limited by the courts in obtaining valuable information that can be used to blackmail and influence politicans.
Unlike Dobbs I thinks President Obama is hiding much that he does not want the American people to know.
While the birth certificate issue has been a topic of much discussion on the blogs, talk radio and YouTube–the new media, the birth certificate issue had not been aired by the three major television networks-ABC, CBS, and NBC.
All three major networks have treated Barack Obama as the anointed and worked for his nomination and election.
The one exception has been the Fox network.
The October Surprise—Suit To Remove Barack Obama From The Ballot. Barack Obama Is A Citizen Of ?
MICHAEL SAVAGE, WHERE IS THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE!
As a result to this day, many Americans are still completely unaware of the issue of the production of a copy of the birth certificate and its significance as to Barack Obama’s qualifications to be President.
Lou Dobbs was the first to fully air the birth certificate issue on television.
For that the Obama media control freaks went ballistic.
Lou Dobbs had rattled their cage.
If Fox News and another network took up the issue, who knows where it would lead and reveal about Barack Obama.
This was getting to0 close to the President and his hidden past of progressive radical socialist associations in New York, Boston, and Chicago and abroad.
Lou Dobbs had to be stopped and taken off television.
Lou Dobbs says Obama has no proof of a valid birth certificate yet. 1 of 2
Lou Dobbs says Obama has no proof of a valid birth certificate yet. 2 of 2
The question could easily become “Who recruited Barack Obama and for what purpose or end?”
Following the document trail and timeline, starting with the birth certificate could lead to many more questions and issues that Obama did not want raised much less answered.
The refusal to produce a copy of Obama’s birth certificate was a firewall that Obama did not want penetrated.
Lou Dobbs will be back on television soon.
You can take it to the bank.
Now if Roger could only convince Rush Limbaugh to join Fox, there would be dancing at the Tea Parties.
Here is an idea for both Roger and Rush.
Have a Rush Weekly Wrapup program on Sunday nights and take on CBS’s 60 Minutes.
Rush needs a challenge.
Rush can you beat CBS 60 Minutes in the ratings?
Prove it.
The joys of capitalistic competition–Only in America–Fox News–We Report, You Decide.
Background Articles and Videos
Why Dobbs Quit CNN: Birthers, Politics
Friday, November 13, 2009
By: Jim Meyers
“…Lou Dobbs walked away from CNN — and $9 million — under pressure to tone down his rhetoric as the network seeks a more centrist position among the cable news channels.
Dobbs announced his resignation from “Lou Dobbs Tonight” on the air Wednesday night following months of friction between the veteran newsman and CNN brass.
The beginning of the end, the New York Post is reporting, came in July when CNN President Jonathan Klein told Dobbs’ staff in a memo to stay away from so-called “birther” stories about doubts that Barack Obama was really born in the United States.
“It seems this story is dead because anyone who still is not convinced doesn’t really have a legitimate beef,” Klein said in the memo.
Dobbs and Klein have been at odds ever since, according to the Post. …”
“… Lou Dobbs, a CNN commentator whose coverage of immigration issues has made him a controversial political figure, said Wednesday he is leaving the network.
“Over the past six months, it has become increasingly clear that strong winds of change have begun buffeting this country and affecting all of us,” Dobbs told viewers Wednesday in a statement read live on his 7 p.m. EST show.
Dobbs said he had arranged with CNN President Jonathan Klein to be released from his contract. He said he had no immediate future plans.
“At this point I’m considering a number of options and directions and I assure you I will let you know when I set my course.” Dobbs said.
Dobbs’ contract was set to run through the end of 2011, The New York Times reported. …”
“…Lou Dobbs, the longtime CNN anchor whose anti-immigration views have made him a TV lightning rod, said Wednesday that he is leaving the cable news channel effective immediately.
Sitting before an image of an American flag on his studio set, he said “some leaders in media, politics and business have been urging me to go beyond the role here at CNN and to engage in constructive problem solving as well as to contribute positively to the great understanding of the issues of our day.”
Jonathan Klein, the president of CNN/U.S. said in a statement that “Lou has now decided to carry the banner of advocacy journalism elsewhere.”
“All of us will miss his appetite for big ideas, the megawatt smile and larger than life presence he brought to our newsroom,” Mr. Klein said.
Wednesday’s program will be Mr. Dobbs’s last on CNN. His contract was not set to expire until the end of 2011. He told viewers that CNN had agreed to release him from his contract early. …”