Nanny Obama Knows Best–How Far Can One Man/Woman Go–Read Rightwing Extremism–Nanny Obama Is Watching You!

Posted on April 17, 2009. Filed under: Blogroll, Climate, Comedy, Economics, Employment, Immigration, Law, Links, People, Philosophy, Politics, Quotations, Rants, Raves, Religion, Resources, Security, Talk Radio, Taxes, Video | Tags: abortion, Barack Obama, Bill of Rights, Black Liberation Theology, DoubtFire, Energy Taxes, First Amendment, freedom of speech, gun control, illegal immigration, Immigration, Marxism, Open borders, President Obama, Radical Socialism, Second Amendment, Taxes, United States Constitution, Veterans |

doubtfire_obama

http://mikemoody.wordpress.com/

If you are a conservative, libertarian, veteran, Catholic, pro-life and anti-abortion Christian or Jew, illegal immigration opponent, unemployed, gun and rifle owner and user, and believer and supporter of the United States Constitution, President Obama has warned your local police and sheriff departments that you may be a recruit for rightwing extremists such as white supremacist and violent anti-government groups.

Looks like I am prime candidate on all counts.

There are just three problems, I am not a racist, I support limited government and I oppose the violent overthrow of the government.

Well President Obama knows left-wing extremists and radical socialists–he has been one since his college years at Columbia University and Harvard Law School, if not earlier.

President Obama attended Reverend Jeremiah Wright’s racist black liberation theology church for over twenty years and was friends and worked closely with a revolutionary socialist bomber for over ten years, Bill Ayers and his wife and fellow terrorist bomber, Bernadine Dohrn.

EMERGENCY; Warning to All U.S.A. Citizens – Obama and Ayers

Obama’s terrorist connections – William Ayers

Part 1: Rev. Jeremiah Wright In His Own Words

Part 2: Rev. Jeremiah Wright In His Own Words

Part 3: Rev. Jeremiah Wright In His Own Words

The reason President Obama never left the church for over twenty-years and remains friends with Bill Ayers to this day is simple.

President Obama is a left-wing extremist–a radical socialist.

President Obama has now set the groundwork or predicate for going after his political opponents.

Instead of rescinding the report and demanding the firing of those responsible for its writing and publication, the press was given limited access and very limited questioning about the report to the Secretary of Homeland Security.

The person responsible for the writing and publication of the report–President Barack Obama!

President Obama said he was not aware of the tea parties.

Sound familiar. Candidate Obama was also unaware of the extreme views of Reverend Wright and Bill Ayers.

May be the Secretary of Homeland Security should give him a “heads-up” to improve his situational awareness!

Never mind.

President Obama lies.

The ends justify the means for all radical socialists.

Do not believe a word the President Obama says–he is conning you.

DHS Report on Right Wing Extremism

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/5410658/DHS-Report-on-Right-Wing-Extremism

rightwing_extremist_report

Lou Dobbs Covers The Disturbing DHS Document Regarding “Right Wing Extremists”

Ralph Peters: DHS report on right-wing extremists is ‘racist’ attack on white Christians.

Glenn Beck April 16 2009 part 1

Glenn Beck April 16 2009 part 2

Mad World of Barack Obama

Partial-Birth Abortion Procedure With Real Instruments – Pro-Life Anti-Abortion Video

Homeland Security Report Upsets Veterans

Napolitano Apologizes To Vets For DHS Report But Adds: Timothy McVeigh ‘Was A Vet’

Obama Will Ban Firearms, Ammo, Gun Shows, Gun Stores, Concealed Carry, shooting, 4x4s, etc.

Obama And The Second Amendment

Ammo Scarce: Americans Prep For Gun Bans, Chaos, Terrorism, Civil Unrest, Economic Collapse

Over 200 top economist against the Obama plan

Dan Mitchell Slams Obama Budget Plan

OBAMA PROMISES TO RAISE YOUR ENERGY BILLS wants Government “Price Signals” “Change Your Behavior”

Shock VIDEO Unearthed Obama says he will bankrupt coal industry

Cap and Trade Carbon Dioxide Tax: Gore’s and Obama’s Revenge on The American People–Let Them Freeze and Sweat!

Introducing the Government-Backed DMV Automotive Repair Center!

Mark Levin Hilarious Rant About Barack Obama And Meet The Press

Mark Levin On Barack Obama’s Incompetence and Socialized Medicine

Barack Obama Makes Shocking confession!!

Join the Second American Revolution

Second American Revolution–Tea Party Celebrations–Washington Fair–July 4, 2009–An Open Invitation To The American People

American People’s Plan = 6 Month Tax Holiday + FairTax = Real Hope + Real Change!–Millions To March On Washington D.C. Saturday, July 4, 2009!

Please Spread The Message of Liberty

Background Articles and Videos

Confirmed: The Obama DHS hit job on conservatives is real

By Michelle Malkin • April 14, 2009 12:01 AM

“…Yesterday, Roger Hedgecock and the Liberty Papers posted an unclassified DHS Office of Intelligence and Analysis report titled:

Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment.

The “report” (PDF file here) was one of the most embarrassingly shoddy pieces of propaganda I’d ever read out of DHS. I couldn’t believe it was real. …”

http://michellemalkin.com/2009/04/14/confirme-the-obama-dhs-hit-job-on-conservatives-is-real/

Nanny State

“…Nanny state is a term that refers to state protectionism, economic interventionism, or regulatory policies (of economic, social or other nature), and the perception that these policies are becoming institutionalized as common practice. Opponents of such policies use the term in their advocacy against what they consider as uninvited and damaging state meddling. It has been referred to as a form of political correctness. …”

“…Its usage varies by political context, but in general it is used in reference to policies where the state is characterized as being excessive in its desire to protect (“nanny”), govern or control particular aspects of society. Which particular aspects are considered to be excessively protected depends on usage. The term can refer to:

public health interventions such as disease surveillance, quarantines, mandatory or government-subsidized vaccination, food labeling regulations, school lunch programs, and water fluoridation^[1]
consumer protectionism that removes or controls otherwise free choices such as helmet laws, anti-smoking laws and other laws regarding personal choices (some of which include a social cost, as in disease in non-smokers cause by second hand smoke)
national economic and social policies (regulation and intervention) that affect large and state-favored businesses
international trade policies that favor native corporate industries (protectionism).

For example, politically conservative or libertarian groups in the United States (especially paleoconservatives that support the free market and capitalism) object to excessive state action to protect people from the consequences of their actions by restricting citizen options.

Liberals on the other hand have used the term to describe the state as being excessive in its protections of businesses and the business class —protections ostensibly made against the public good, and the good of consumers. This usage applies to the international context as well, where the “public good” is used to refer to people in general, and where the state is viewed as being excessive in its protection of native business over foreign (rival) businesses.

The term “Nanny State” was probably coined by the Conservative British MP Iain Macleod who wrote “what I like to call the nanny state . . .” in his column “Quoodle” in the December 3, 1965 edition of The Spectator.^{[citation needed]}

American foreign policy critic Noam Chomsky regularly uses the term “nanny state” to refer to U.S. protectionist policy. …”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanny_state

The Constitution Is A Subversive Manifesto Per DHS

By William A. Jacobson

“…One thing that is not clear from the news reports, to begin with, is that the Report specifically states that there is no current real threat, even from the most extreme White Supremacist groups: “Threats from white supremacist and violent anti-government groups during 2009 have been mostly rhetorical and have not indicated plans to carry out violent acts.” From the news accounts, you would think there was an actual threat, but that is not so.

But the even bigger vice is how a “rightwing extremist” is defined. I don’t disagree that the few remaining White Supremacist groups should be in any definition, but DHS puts a distinctly political spin on the definition (emphasis mine):

Rightwing extremism in the United States can be broadly divided into those groups, movements, and adherents that are primarily hate-oriented (based on hatred of particular religious, racial or ethnic groups), and those that are mainly antigovernment, rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority, or rejecting government authority entirely. It may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration.

This definition is so broad as to include anyone who seeks to preserve the foundation of our federal-state constitutional distinction, under the 10th Amendment (“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people”), because such a person could be deemed to “reject federal authority in favor of state or local authority.” So Texas Governor Rick Perry, who has come out in support of preserving the constitutional integrity of Texas now should be on the DHS‘ extremist and radical watch-list.

Similarly, the reference to “abortion or immigration” is purely political. Why pick those two subjects? If someone is planning violence, that is one thing. But vocalizing one’s view on a subject and seeking to influence the government are protected by the 1st Amendment (“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances …”

http://legalinsurrection.blogspot.com/2009/04/constitution-is-subversive-manifesto.html

Janet Napolitano’s Extremist Makeover tour
By Michelle Malkin

“…Janet Napolitano made the media rounds this morning to face the public firestorm over DHS’s hit job on conservatives.

I’m calling it the Extremist Makeover tour.

She offered an apology to veterans, saying it wasn’t her intention to offend. It may not have been the intention of the report authors or Napolitano to offend or overreach, but that was certainly the effect. And it remains a mystery why Napolitano felt it necessary to distribute a shoddy nine-page report that was supposedly in the works under the Bush administration for a year, as Napolitano claims, containing zero data backing up the claim of a “resurgence” of rightwing extremist violence — and was padded with analysis from the left-wing Southern Poverty Law Center to stir fear of “disgruntled military veterans.”

On Fox and Friends this morning, Napolitano admitted that she would have changed the definition included in the report. …”

http://michellemalkin.com/2009/04/16/janet-napolitanos-extremist-makeover-tour/

You might be a radicalized rightwing extremist if…

By Michelle Malkin

“…if you are heading out to a Tea Party today!

Here’s my syndicated column on the DHS hit job. A few may be inclined to give DHS the benefit of the doubt. Andrew McCarthy reminds you of the many reasons why you should not.

***

(Photoshop: Tennyson Hayes)

You might be a “radicalized rightwing extremist” if…
by Michelle Malkin …”

http://michellemalkin.com/2009/04/15/you-might-be-a-radicalized-rightwing-extremist-if/

The vaunted “Left-Wing Extremism” report

By Ed Morrissey

“… is here, courtesy of Jake Tapper. This is the report heralded by counter-critics of the DHS report on “right-wing extremism” that supposedly disproves political bias in the substance-free attack on conservative critics. Except that the report on extremism of the Left is much different than the other DHS report, starting with specifics. While the DHS report focusing on the Right expansively and generally indicted groups opposing abortion, illegal immigration, and federalism, this report instead focuses on actual and specific extremist groups — groups who have a long history of domestic terrorism and violence (page 9):

(U//FOUO) DHS/Office of Intelligence and Analysis defines leftwing extremists as groups or individuals who embrace radical elements of the anarchist, animal rights, or environmental movements and are often willing to violate the law to achieve their objectives. Many leftwing extremist groups are not hierarchically ordered with defined members, leaders, or chain of command structures but operate as loosely-connected underground movements composed of “lone wolves,” small cells, and splinter groups.

— (U//LES) Animal rights and environmental extremists seek to end the perceived abuse and suffering of animals and the degradation of the natural environment perpetrated by humans. They use non-violent and violent tactics that, at times, violate criminal law. Many of these extremists claim they are conducting these activities on behalf of two of the most active groups, the Animal Liberation Front and its sister organization, the Earth Liberation Front. Other prominent groups include Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty; and chapters within the Animal Defense League, and Earth First!.

— (U//FOUO) Anarchist extremists generally embrace a number of radical philosophical components of anticapitalist, antiglobalization, communist, socialist, and other movements. Anarchist groups seek abolition of social, political, and economic hierarchies, including Western-style governments and large business enterprises, and frequently advocate criminal actions of varying scale and scope to accomplish their goals. Anarchist extremist groups include entities within Crimethinc, the Ruckus Society, and Recreate 68.

In other words, it does not treat all animal-rights criticisms as indications of terrorist thought. It fails to paint all opponents of free trade as potential national-security threats. Global warming activism does not get treated in this instance as federalism does in the execrable DHS report on conservatives and libertarians. In other words, in this report, the DHS actually focuses on threats, not becoming the Thought Police. …”

http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/15/the-vaunted-left-wing-extremism-report/

“…The Department of Homeland Security is warning law enforcement officials about a rise in “rightwing extremist activity,” saying the economic recession, the election of America’s first black president and the return of a few disgruntled war veterans could swell the ranks of white-power militias.

Tuesday, April 14, 2009

Federal agency warns of radicals on right

A footnote attached to the report by the Homeland Security Office of Intelligence and Analysis defines “rightwing extremism in the United States” as including not just racist or hate groups, but also groups that reject federal authority in favor of state or local authority.

“It may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single-issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration,” the warning says. …”

The White House has distanced itself from the analysis. When asked for comment on its contents, White House spokesman Nick Shapiro said, “The President is focused not on politics but rather taking the steps necessary to protect all Americans from the threat of violence and terrorism regardless of its origins. He also believes those who serve represent the best of this country, and he will continue to ensure that our veterans receive the respect and benefits they have earned.” …”

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/apr/14/federal-agency-warns-of-radicals-on-right/print/